Cargando…
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature
INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological therapy is recommended as a second-line alternative to reverse obesity. Currently, five anti-obesity drugs (AODs) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for chronic weight management. The aim of this paper is to investigate the pharmacoeconomi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38027186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1254398 |
_version_ | 1785137364611366912 |
---|---|
author | Xue, Yan Zou, Huimin Ruan, Zhen Chen, Xianwen Lai, Yunfeng Yao, Dongning Ung, Carolina Oi Lam Hu, Hao |
author_facet | Xue, Yan Zou, Huimin Ruan, Zhen Chen, Xianwen Lai, Yunfeng Yao, Dongning Ung, Carolina Oi Lam Hu, Hao |
author_sort | Xue, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological therapy is recommended as a second-line alternative to reverse obesity. Currently, five anti-obesity drugs (AODs) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for chronic weight management. The aim of this paper is to investigate the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of AODs through a systematic review with a special focus on methodological considerations. METHODS: We searched the general and specific databases to identify the primary pharmacoeconomic evaluation of AODs. RESULTS: A total of 18 full-text articles and three conference abstracts were included in this review. Most of the economic assessments were still about Orlistat. And the observations we could make were consistent with the previous systematic review. A few studies were on the combined therapies (i.e. PHEN/TPM ER and NB ER) compared to different comparators, which could hardly lead to a generalized summary of the cost-effectiveness. Most recently, pharmacoeconomic evidence on the newest GLP 1 RA approved for the indication of obesity or obesity with at least one comorbidity emerged gradually. Modelling-based cost-utility analysis is the major type of assessment method. In the modelling studies, a manageable number of the key health states and the state transitions were structured to capture the disease progression. In particular, the principal structure of the decision model adopted in the three studies on the newly approved drug was nearly the same, which enables more in-depth comparisons and generalizations of the findings. CONCLUSION: This study provided an up-to-date overview of the strengths and areas for improvement in the methodological design of the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the licensed drugs for chronic weight management. Future modelling evaluations would benefit from a better understanding of the long-term weight loss effects of the current therapeutic options and the weight rebound process after the discontinuation of treatment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022302648, identifier CRD42022302648. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10658190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106581902023-01-01 Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature Xue, Yan Zou, Huimin Ruan, Zhen Chen, Xianwen Lai, Yunfeng Yao, Dongning Ung, Carolina Oi Lam Hu, Hao Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological therapy is recommended as a second-line alternative to reverse obesity. Currently, five anti-obesity drugs (AODs) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for chronic weight management. The aim of this paper is to investigate the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of AODs through a systematic review with a special focus on methodological considerations. METHODS: We searched the general and specific databases to identify the primary pharmacoeconomic evaluation of AODs. RESULTS: A total of 18 full-text articles and three conference abstracts were included in this review. Most of the economic assessments were still about Orlistat. And the observations we could make were consistent with the previous systematic review. A few studies were on the combined therapies (i.e. PHEN/TPM ER and NB ER) compared to different comparators, which could hardly lead to a generalized summary of the cost-effectiveness. Most recently, pharmacoeconomic evidence on the newest GLP 1 RA approved for the indication of obesity or obesity with at least one comorbidity emerged gradually. Modelling-based cost-utility analysis is the major type of assessment method. In the modelling studies, a manageable number of the key health states and the state transitions were structured to capture the disease progression. In particular, the principal structure of the decision model adopted in the three studies on the newly approved drug was nearly the same, which enables more in-depth comparisons and generalizations of the findings. CONCLUSION: This study provided an up-to-date overview of the strengths and areas for improvement in the methodological design of the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the licensed drugs for chronic weight management. Future modelling evaluations would benefit from a better understanding of the long-term weight loss effects of the current therapeutic options and the weight rebound process after the discontinuation of treatment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022302648, identifier CRD42022302648. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10658190/ /pubmed/38027186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1254398 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xue, Zou, Ruan, Chen, Lai, Yao, Ung and Hu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Xue, Yan Zou, Huimin Ruan, Zhen Chen, Xianwen Lai, Yunfeng Yao, Dongning Ung, Carolina Oi Lam Hu, Hao Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature |
title | Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature |
title_full | Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature |
title_fullStr | Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature |
title_short | Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature |
title_sort | pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38027186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1254398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xueyan pharmacoeconomicevaluationofantiobesitydrugsforchronicweightmanagementasystematicreviewofliterature AT zouhuimin pharmacoeconomicevaluationofantiobesitydrugsforchronicweightmanagementasystematicreviewofliterature AT ruanzhen pharmacoeconomicevaluationofantiobesitydrugsforchronicweightmanagementasystematicreviewofliterature AT chenxianwen pharmacoeconomicevaluationofantiobesitydrugsforchronicweightmanagementasystematicreviewofliterature AT laiyunfeng pharmacoeconomicevaluationofantiobesitydrugsforchronicweightmanagementasystematicreviewofliterature AT yaodongning pharmacoeconomicevaluationofantiobesitydrugsforchronicweightmanagementasystematicreviewofliterature AT ungcarolinaoilam pharmacoeconomicevaluationofantiobesitydrugsforchronicweightmanagementasystematicreviewofliterature AT huhao pharmacoeconomicevaluationofantiobesitydrugsforchronicweightmanagementasystematicreviewofliterature |