Cargando…

Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites

BACKGROUND: Self-adhering composites are claimed to bond to teeth without prior acid etching and bonding steps. This study aimed to evaluate the cyclic shear fatigue (CSF) of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites (Constic and Vertise(TM) Flow) in compari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abu Haimed, Tariq, Osama Filfilan, Reham, Nazih Hassoubah, Mawadah, Abou Neel, Ensanya A., Bamashmous, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38025604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.07.014
_version_ 1785137405284581376
author Abu Haimed, Tariq
Osama Filfilan, Reham
Nazih Hassoubah, Mawadah
Abou Neel, Ensanya A.
Bamashmous, Mohamed
author_facet Abu Haimed, Tariq
Osama Filfilan, Reham
Nazih Hassoubah, Mawadah
Abou Neel, Ensanya A.
Bamashmous, Mohamed
author_sort Abu Haimed, Tariq
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-adhering composites are claimed to bond to teeth without prior acid etching and bonding steps. This study aimed to evaluate the cyclic shear fatigue (CSF) of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites (Constic and Vertise(TM) Flow) in comparison with that of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five human premolars comprising 100 surfaces were randomly divided into four groups (n = 25): total-etch, self-etch, Constic, and Vertise(TM) Flow. A total of 10 surfaces were used per group for baseline static shear bond strength (SSBS) evaluation and 15 surfaces for CSF evaluation. Each tooth was treated with the four bonding agents. Both SSBS and CSF were evaluated using a universal testing machine. For CSF, the staircase method was used with an initial pulling load equivalent to 60% of the SSBS of each group for 1000 cycles or until failure. The adhesive remaining index (ARI) was evaluated for surviving samples using a stereomicroscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test was used to analyze the CSF data, and a chi-square test was used to analyze the ARI. RESULTS: The total-etch adhesive showed significantly higher CSF values than that of the other groups (p < 0.001). Both total-etch (10.78 ± 0.31 MPa) and self-etch (6.75 ± 0.91 MPa) adhesives showed significantly higher CSF than did Constic (1.94 ± 0.31 MPa) and Vertise(TM) Flow (2.01 ± 0.25 MPa), (p < 0.001). The ARI indicated that more resin remnants were observed with the total-etch and self-etch adhesives than those with the self-adhering flowable composites. However, no significant differences were observed among groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Total-etch and self-etch adhesives showed satisfactory bond strengths for orthodontic treatment. However, Constic and Vertise(TM) Flow self-adhering flowable composites may not be clinically sufficient for bonding metallic orthodontic brackets to enamel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10658384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106583842023-08-07 Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites Abu Haimed, Tariq Osama Filfilan, Reham Nazih Hassoubah, Mawadah Abou Neel, Ensanya A. Bamashmous, Mohamed Saudi Dent J Original Article BACKGROUND: Self-adhering composites are claimed to bond to teeth without prior acid etching and bonding steps. This study aimed to evaluate the cyclic shear fatigue (CSF) of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites (Constic and Vertise(TM) Flow) in comparison with that of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five human premolars comprising 100 surfaces were randomly divided into four groups (n = 25): total-etch, self-etch, Constic, and Vertise(TM) Flow. A total of 10 surfaces were used per group for baseline static shear bond strength (SSBS) evaluation and 15 surfaces for CSF evaluation. Each tooth was treated with the four bonding agents. Both SSBS and CSF were evaluated using a universal testing machine. For CSF, the staircase method was used with an initial pulling load equivalent to 60% of the SSBS of each group for 1000 cycles or until failure. The adhesive remaining index (ARI) was evaluated for surviving samples using a stereomicroscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test was used to analyze the CSF data, and a chi-square test was used to analyze the ARI. RESULTS: The total-etch adhesive showed significantly higher CSF values than that of the other groups (p < 0.001). Both total-etch (10.78 ± 0.31 MPa) and self-etch (6.75 ± 0.91 MPa) adhesives showed significantly higher CSF than did Constic (1.94 ± 0.31 MPa) and Vertise(TM) Flow (2.01 ± 0.25 MPa), (p < 0.001). The ARI indicated that more resin remnants were observed with the total-etch and self-etch adhesives than those with the self-adhering flowable composites. However, no significant differences were observed among groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Total-etch and self-etch adhesives showed satisfactory bond strengths for orthodontic treatment. However, Constic and Vertise(TM) Flow self-adhering flowable composites may not be clinically sufficient for bonding metallic orthodontic brackets to enamel. Elsevier 2023-11 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10658384/ /pubmed/38025604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.07.014 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Abu Haimed, Tariq
Osama Filfilan, Reham
Nazih Hassoubah, Mawadah
Abou Neel, Ensanya A.
Bamashmous, Mohamed
Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites
title Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites
title_full Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites
title_fullStr Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites
title_full_unstemmed Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites
title_short Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites
title_sort cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38025604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.07.014
work_keys_str_mv AT abuhaimedtariq cyclicshearfatigueoforthodonticbracketsbondedtoenamelusingselfadheringflowablecomposites
AT osamafilfilanreham cyclicshearfatigueoforthodonticbracketsbondedtoenamelusingselfadheringflowablecomposites
AT nazihhassoubahmawadah cyclicshearfatigueoforthodonticbracketsbondedtoenamelusingselfadheringflowablecomposites
AT abouneelensanyaa cyclicshearfatigueoforthodonticbracketsbondedtoenamelusingselfadheringflowablecomposites
AT bamashmousmohamed cyclicshearfatigueoforthodonticbracketsbondedtoenamelusingselfadheringflowablecomposites