Cargando…

Attentional Biases Toward Spiders Do Not Modulate Retrieval

Abstract. When responding to stimuli, response and stimulus’ features are thought to be integrated into a short episodic memory trace, an event file. Repeating any of its components causes retrieval of the whole event file leading to benefits for full repetitions and changes but interference for par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schöpper, Lars-Michael, Küpper, Verena, Frings, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hogrefe Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000584
_version_ 1785148233971924992
author Schöpper, Lars-Michael
Küpper, Verena
Frings, Christian
author_facet Schöpper, Lars-Michael
Küpper, Verena
Frings, Christian
author_sort Schöpper, Lars-Michael
collection PubMed
description Abstract. When responding to stimuli, response and stimulus’ features are thought to be integrated into a short episodic memory trace, an event file. Repeating any of its components causes retrieval of the whole event file leading to benefits for full repetitions and changes but interference for partial repetitions. These binding effects are especially pronounced if attention is allocated to certain features. We used attentional biases caused by spider stimuli, aiming to modulate the impact of attention on retrieval. Participants discriminated the orientation of bars repeating or changing their location in prime-probe sequences. Crucially, shortly before probe target onset, an image of a spider and that of a cub appeared at one position each – one of which was spatially congruent with the following probe target. Participants were faster when responding to targets spatially congruent with a preceding spider, suggesting an attentional bias toward aversive information. Yet, neither overall binding effects differed between content of preceding spatially congruent images nor did this effect emerge when taking individual fear of spiders into account. We conclude that attentional biases toward spiders modulate overall behavior, but that this has no impact on retrieval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10658639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hogrefe Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106586392023-11-20 Attentional Biases Toward Spiders Do Not Modulate Retrieval Schöpper, Lars-Michael Küpper, Verena Frings, Christian Exp Psychol Research Article Abstract. When responding to stimuli, response and stimulus’ features are thought to be integrated into a short episodic memory trace, an event file. Repeating any of its components causes retrieval of the whole event file leading to benefits for full repetitions and changes but interference for partial repetitions. These binding effects are especially pronounced if attention is allocated to certain features. We used attentional biases caused by spider stimuli, aiming to modulate the impact of attention on retrieval. Participants discriminated the orientation of bars repeating or changing their location in prime-probe sequences. Crucially, shortly before probe target onset, an image of a spider and that of a cub appeared at one position each – one of which was spatially congruent with the following probe target. Participants were faster when responding to targets spatially congruent with a preceding spider, suggesting an attentional bias toward aversive information. Yet, neither overall binding effects differed between content of preceding spatially congruent images nor did this effect emerge when taking individual fear of spiders into account. We conclude that attentional biases toward spiders modulate overall behavior, but that this has no impact on retrieval. Hogrefe Publishing 2023-08-17 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10658639/ /pubmed/37589232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000584 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Research Article
Schöpper, Lars-Michael
Küpper, Verena
Frings, Christian
Attentional Biases Toward Spiders Do Not Modulate Retrieval
title Attentional Biases Toward Spiders Do Not Modulate Retrieval
title_full Attentional Biases Toward Spiders Do Not Modulate Retrieval
title_fullStr Attentional Biases Toward Spiders Do Not Modulate Retrieval
title_full_unstemmed Attentional Biases Toward Spiders Do Not Modulate Retrieval
title_short Attentional Biases Toward Spiders Do Not Modulate Retrieval
title_sort attentional biases toward spiders do not modulate retrieval
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000584
work_keys_str_mv AT schopperlarsmichael attentionalbiasestowardspidersdonotmodulateretrieval
AT kupperverena attentionalbiasestowardspidersdonotmodulateretrieval
AT fringschristian attentionalbiasestowardspidersdonotmodulateretrieval