Cargando…
The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the impact of duration of early mobilisation on survivors of critical illness. The hypothesis was that interventions lasting over 40 min, as per the German guideline, positively affect the functional status at ICU discharge. METHODS: Prospective single-centre c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00703-1 |
_version_ | 1785148242733826048 |
---|---|
author | Lorenz, Marco Fuest, Kristina Ulm, Bernhard Grunow, Julius J. Warner, Linus Bald, Annika Arsene, Vanessa Verfuß, Michael Daum, Nils Blobner, Manfred Schaller, Stefan J. |
author_facet | Lorenz, Marco Fuest, Kristina Ulm, Bernhard Grunow, Julius J. Warner, Linus Bald, Annika Arsene, Vanessa Verfuß, Michael Daum, Nils Blobner, Manfred Schaller, Stefan J. |
author_sort | Lorenz, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the impact of duration of early mobilisation on survivors of critical illness. The hypothesis was that interventions lasting over 40 min, as per the German guideline, positively affect the functional status at ICU discharge. METHODS: Prospective single-centre cohort study conducted in two ICUs in Germany. In 684 critically ill patients surviving an ICU stay > 24 h, out-of-bed mobilisation of more than 40 min was evaluated. RESULTS: Daily mobilisation ≥ 40 min was identified as an independent predictor of an improved functional status upon ICU discharge. This effect on the primary outcome measure, change of Mobility-Barthel until ICU discharge, was observed in three different models for baseline patient characteristics (average treatment effect (ATE), all three models p < 0.001). When mobilisation parameters like level of mobilisation, were included in the analysis, the average treatment effect disappeared [ATE 1.0 (95% CI − 0.4 to 2.4), p = 0.16]. CONCLUSIONS: A mobilisation duration of more than 40 min positively impacts functional outcomes at ICU discharge. However, the maximum level achieved during ICU stay was the most crucial factor regarding adequate dosage, as higher duration did not show an additional benefit in patients with already high mobilisation levels. Trial registration: Prospective Registry of Mobilization-, Routine- and Outcome Data of Intensive Care Patients (MOBDB), NCT03666286. Registered 11 September 2018—retrospectively registered, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03666286. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-023-00703-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10658796 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106587962023-11-20 The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study Lorenz, Marco Fuest, Kristina Ulm, Bernhard Grunow, Julius J. Warner, Linus Bald, Annika Arsene, Vanessa Verfuß, Michael Daum, Nils Blobner, Manfred Schaller, Stefan J. J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the impact of duration of early mobilisation on survivors of critical illness. The hypothesis was that interventions lasting over 40 min, as per the German guideline, positively affect the functional status at ICU discharge. METHODS: Prospective single-centre cohort study conducted in two ICUs in Germany. In 684 critically ill patients surviving an ICU stay > 24 h, out-of-bed mobilisation of more than 40 min was evaluated. RESULTS: Daily mobilisation ≥ 40 min was identified as an independent predictor of an improved functional status upon ICU discharge. This effect on the primary outcome measure, change of Mobility-Barthel until ICU discharge, was observed in three different models for baseline patient characteristics (average treatment effect (ATE), all three models p < 0.001). When mobilisation parameters like level of mobilisation, were included in the analysis, the average treatment effect disappeared [ATE 1.0 (95% CI − 0.4 to 2.4), p = 0.16]. CONCLUSIONS: A mobilisation duration of more than 40 min positively impacts functional outcomes at ICU discharge. However, the maximum level achieved during ICU stay was the most crucial factor regarding adequate dosage, as higher duration did not show an additional benefit in patients with already high mobilisation levels. Trial registration: Prospective Registry of Mobilization-, Routine- and Outcome Data of Intensive Care Patients (MOBDB), NCT03666286. Registered 11 September 2018—retrospectively registered, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03666286. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40560-023-00703-1. BioMed Central 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10658796/ /pubmed/37986100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00703-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lorenz, Marco Fuest, Kristina Ulm, Bernhard Grunow, Julius J. Warner, Linus Bald, Annika Arsene, Vanessa Verfuß, Michael Daum, Nils Blobner, Manfred Schaller, Stefan J. The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study |
title | The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the icu: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00703-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorenzmarco theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT fuestkristina theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT ulmbernhard theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT grunowjuliusj theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT warnerlinus theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT baldannika theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT arsenevanessa theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT verfußmichael theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT daumnils theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT blobnermanfred theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT schallerstefanj theoptimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT lorenzmarco optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT fuestkristina optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT ulmbernhard optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT grunowjuliusj optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT warnerlinus optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT baldannika optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT arsenevanessa optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT verfußmichael optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT daumnils optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT blobnermanfred optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy AT schallerstefanj optimaldoseofmobilisationtherapyintheicuaprospectivecohortstudy |