Cargando…

Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy and toxic effects of bepotastine besilate 1.5% preservative-free (BB-PF) and olopatadine 0.2% BAK-preserved (OL-BAK) drops on the ocular surface of patients with allergic conjunctivitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with allergic conjunctivitis diagnosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marini, María Cecilia, Berra, Martín Lucas, Girado, Fernada, Albera, Paula Alejandra, del Papa, Melina Sol, Passerini, María Silvia, Aguilar, Alejandro Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026598
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S431889
_version_ 1785148261392187392
author Marini, María Cecilia
Berra, Martín Lucas
Girado, Fernada
Albera, Paula Alejandra
del Papa, Melina Sol
Passerini, María Silvia
Aguilar, Alejandro Javier
author_facet Marini, María Cecilia
Berra, Martín Lucas
Girado, Fernada
Albera, Paula Alejandra
del Papa, Melina Sol
Passerini, María Silvia
Aguilar, Alejandro Javier
author_sort Marini, María Cecilia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To study the efficacy and toxic effects of bepotastine besilate 1.5% preservative-free (BB-PF) and olopatadine 0.2% BAK-preserved (OL-BAK) drops on the ocular surface of patients with allergic conjunctivitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with allergic conjunctivitis diagnosis participated in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Patients received either BB-PF (n=48) or OL-BAK (n=49), both administered once daily in the morning. The patients were followed for 60 days. Ocular itching was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included ocular symptoms, signs, and non-ocular symptoms associated with rhinoconjunctivitis. Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) was performed to evaluate histopathological changes related to the toxic effects of preservatives. RESULTS: BB-PF treatment was associated with a 1.30 more probability of diminished ocular itching than OL-BAK (odds ratio (OR)=1.30; 95% CI=(0.96–1.7); p=0.086). No statistically significant differences were found between treatments in the resolution of other ocular symptoms or signs, except for tearing, which was superior in the BB-PF (OR=1.37; 95% (1.26–1.47); p<0.0001). BB-PF was superior in terms of the resolution of rhinorrhea (p=0.040) and nasal itching (p=0.037). After 60 days of treatment, the BB-PF group exhibited 2.0 times higher probability of having a lower Nelson scale score compared to the OL-BAK group (OR=2.00; 95% CI=(1.19–3.34); p=0.010). CONCLUSION: Both medications presented a similar efficacy in terms of the resolution of ocular signs and symptoms associated with ocular conjunctivitis. BB-PF is superior in the resolution of non-ocular symptoms and safer for the ocular surface than OL-BAK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10658941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106589412023-11-16 Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis Marini, María Cecilia Berra, Martín Lucas Girado, Fernada Albera, Paula Alejandra del Papa, Melina Sol Passerini, María Silvia Aguilar, Alejandro Javier Clin Ophthalmol Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: To study the efficacy and toxic effects of bepotastine besilate 1.5% preservative-free (BB-PF) and olopatadine 0.2% BAK-preserved (OL-BAK) drops on the ocular surface of patients with allergic conjunctivitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with allergic conjunctivitis diagnosis participated in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Patients received either BB-PF (n=48) or OL-BAK (n=49), both administered once daily in the morning. The patients were followed for 60 days. Ocular itching was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included ocular symptoms, signs, and non-ocular symptoms associated with rhinoconjunctivitis. Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) was performed to evaluate histopathological changes related to the toxic effects of preservatives. RESULTS: BB-PF treatment was associated with a 1.30 more probability of diminished ocular itching than OL-BAK (odds ratio (OR)=1.30; 95% CI=(0.96–1.7); p=0.086). No statistically significant differences were found between treatments in the resolution of other ocular symptoms or signs, except for tearing, which was superior in the BB-PF (OR=1.37; 95% (1.26–1.47); p<0.0001). BB-PF was superior in terms of the resolution of rhinorrhea (p=0.040) and nasal itching (p=0.037). After 60 days of treatment, the BB-PF group exhibited 2.0 times higher probability of having a lower Nelson scale score compared to the OL-BAK group (OR=2.00; 95% CI=(1.19–3.34); p=0.010). CONCLUSION: Both medications presented a similar efficacy in terms of the resolution of ocular signs and symptoms associated with ocular conjunctivitis. BB-PF is superior in the resolution of non-ocular symptoms and safer for the ocular surface than OL-BAK. Dove 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10658941/ /pubmed/38026598 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S431889 Text en © 2023 Marini et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Marini, María Cecilia
Berra, Martín Lucas
Girado, Fernada
Albera, Paula Alejandra
del Papa, Melina Sol
Passerini, María Silvia
Aguilar, Alejandro Javier
Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis
title Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis
title_full Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis
title_short Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis
title_sort efficacy and toxicity evaluation of bepotastine besilate 1.5% preservative-free eye drops vs olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% bak-preserved eye drops in patients with allergic conjunctivitis
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026598
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S431889
work_keys_str_mv AT marinimariacecilia efficacyandtoxicityevaluationofbepotastinebesilate15preservativefreeeyedropsvsolopatadinehydrochloride02bakpreservedeyedropsinpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT berramartinlucas efficacyandtoxicityevaluationofbepotastinebesilate15preservativefreeeyedropsvsolopatadinehydrochloride02bakpreservedeyedropsinpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT giradofernada efficacyandtoxicityevaluationofbepotastinebesilate15preservativefreeeyedropsvsolopatadinehydrochloride02bakpreservedeyedropsinpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT alberapaulaalejandra efficacyandtoxicityevaluationofbepotastinebesilate15preservativefreeeyedropsvsolopatadinehydrochloride02bakpreservedeyedropsinpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT delpapamelinasol efficacyandtoxicityevaluationofbepotastinebesilate15preservativefreeeyedropsvsolopatadinehydrochloride02bakpreservedeyedropsinpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT passerinimariasilvia efficacyandtoxicityevaluationofbepotastinebesilate15preservativefreeeyedropsvsolopatadinehydrochloride02bakpreservedeyedropsinpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis
AT aguilaralejandrojavier efficacyandtoxicityevaluationofbepotastinebesilate15preservativefreeeyedropsvsolopatadinehydrochloride02bakpreservedeyedropsinpatientswithallergicconjunctivitis