Cargando…
Dense neural network outperforms other machine learning models for scaling-up lichen cover maps in Eastern Canada
Lichen mapping is vital for caribou management plans and sustainable land conservation. Previous studies have used random forest, dense neural network, and convolutional neural network models for mapping lichen coverage. However, to date, it is not clear how these models rank in this task. In this s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37983235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292839 |
_version_ | 1785148292459397120 |
---|---|
author | Richardson, Galen Knudby, Anders Chen, Wenjun Sawada, Michael Lovitt, Julie He, Liming Naeni, Leila Yousefizadeh |
author_facet | Richardson, Galen Knudby, Anders Chen, Wenjun Sawada, Michael Lovitt, Julie He, Liming Naeni, Leila Yousefizadeh |
author_sort | Richardson, Galen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lichen mapping is vital for caribou management plans and sustainable land conservation. Previous studies have used random forest, dense neural network, and convolutional neural network models for mapping lichen coverage. However, to date, it is not clear how these models rank in this task. In this study, these machine learning models were evaluated on their ability to predict lichen percent coverage in Sentinel-2 imagery in Québec and Labrador, Canada. The models were trained on 10-m resolution lichen coverage (%) maps created from 20 drone surveys collected in July 2019 and 2022. The dense neural network achieved a higher accuracy than the other two, with a reported mean absolute error of 5.2% and an R(2) of 0.76. By comparison, the random forest model returned a mean absolute error of 5.5% (R(2): 0.74) and the convolutional neural network had a mean absolute error of 5.3% (R(2): 0.74). A regional lichen map was created using the trained dense neural network and a Sentinel-2 imagery mosaic. There was greater uncertainty on land covers that the model was not exposed to in training, such as mines and deep lakes. While the dense neural network requires more computational effort to train than a random forest model, the 5.9% performance gain in the test pixel comparison renders it the most suitable for lichen mapping. This study represents progress toward determining the appropriate methodology for generating accurate lichen maps from satellite imagery for caribou conservation and sustainable land management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10659193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106591932023-11-20 Dense neural network outperforms other machine learning models for scaling-up lichen cover maps in Eastern Canada Richardson, Galen Knudby, Anders Chen, Wenjun Sawada, Michael Lovitt, Julie He, Liming Naeni, Leila Yousefizadeh PLoS One Research Article Lichen mapping is vital for caribou management plans and sustainable land conservation. Previous studies have used random forest, dense neural network, and convolutional neural network models for mapping lichen coverage. However, to date, it is not clear how these models rank in this task. In this study, these machine learning models were evaluated on their ability to predict lichen percent coverage in Sentinel-2 imagery in Québec and Labrador, Canada. The models were trained on 10-m resolution lichen coverage (%) maps created from 20 drone surveys collected in July 2019 and 2022. The dense neural network achieved a higher accuracy than the other two, with a reported mean absolute error of 5.2% and an R(2) of 0.76. By comparison, the random forest model returned a mean absolute error of 5.5% (R(2): 0.74) and the convolutional neural network had a mean absolute error of 5.3% (R(2): 0.74). A regional lichen map was created using the trained dense neural network and a Sentinel-2 imagery mosaic. There was greater uncertainty on land covers that the model was not exposed to in training, such as mines and deep lakes. While the dense neural network requires more computational effort to train than a random forest model, the 5.9% performance gain in the test pixel comparison renders it the most suitable for lichen mapping. This study represents progress toward determining the appropriate methodology for generating accurate lichen maps from satellite imagery for caribou conservation and sustainable land management. Public Library of Science 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10659193/ /pubmed/37983235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292839 Text en © 2023 Richardson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Richardson, Galen Knudby, Anders Chen, Wenjun Sawada, Michael Lovitt, Julie He, Liming Naeni, Leila Yousefizadeh Dense neural network outperforms other machine learning models for scaling-up lichen cover maps in Eastern Canada |
title | Dense neural network outperforms other machine learning models for scaling-up lichen cover maps in Eastern Canada |
title_full | Dense neural network outperforms other machine learning models for scaling-up lichen cover maps in Eastern Canada |
title_fullStr | Dense neural network outperforms other machine learning models for scaling-up lichen cover maps in Eastern Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Dense neural network outperforms other machine learning models for scaling-up lichen cover maps in Eastern Canada |
title_short | Dense neural network outperforms other machine learning models for scaling-up lichen cover maps in Eastern Canada |
title_sort | dense neural network outperforms other machine learning models for scaling-up lichen cover maps in eastern canada |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37983235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292839 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richardsongalen denseneuralnetworkoutperformsothermachinelearningmodelsforscalinguplichencovermapsineasterncanada AT knudbyanders denseneuralnetworkoutperformsothermachinelearningmodelsforscalinguplichencovermapsineasterncanada AT chenwenjun denseneuralnetworkoutperformsothermachinelearningmodelsforscalinguplichencovermapsineasterncanada AT sawadamichael denseneuralnetworkoutperformsothermachinelearningmodelsforscalinguplichencovermapsineasterncanada AT lovittjulie denseneuralnetworkoutperformsothermachinelearningmodelsforscalinguplichencovermapsineasterncanada AT heliming denseneuralnetworkoutperformsothermachinelearningmodelsforscalinguplichencovermapsineasterncanada AT naenileilayousefizadeh denseneuralnetworkoutperformsothermachinelearningmodelsforscalinguplichencovermapsineasterncanada |