Cargando…

The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity

Limiting climate change to 1.5°C and achieving net-zero emissions would entail substantial carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere by the mid-century, but how much CDR is needed at country level over time is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed description of when and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Pu, Mi, Zhifu, Wei, Yi-Ming, Hanssen, Steef V, Liu, Lan-Cui, Coffman, D’Maris, Sun, Xinlu, Liao, Hua, Yao, Yun-Fei, Kang, Jia-Ning, Wang, Peng-Tao, Davis, Steven J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad254
_version_ 1785137555129237504
author Yang, Pu
Mi, Zhifu
Wei, Yi-Ming
Hanssen, Steef V
Liu, Lan-Cui
Coffman, D’Maris
Sun, Xinlu
Liao, Hua
Yao, Yun-Fei
Kang, Jia-Ning
Wang, Peng-Tao
Davis, Steven J
author_facet Yang, Pu
Mi, Zhifu
Wei, Yi-Ming
Hanssen, Steef V
Liu, Lan-Cui
Coffman, D’Maris
Sun, Xinlu
Liao, Hua
Yao, Yun-Fei
Kang, Jia-Ning
Wang, Peng-Tao
Davis, Steven J
author_sort Yang, Pu
collection PubMed
description Limiting climate change to 1.5°C and achieving net-zero emissions would entail substantial carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere by the mid-century, but how much CDR is needed at country level over time is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed description of when and how much CDR is required at country level in order to achieve 1.5°C and how much CDR countries can carry out domestically. We allocate global CDR pathways among 170 countries according to 6 equity principles and assess these allocations with respect to countries’ biophysical and geophysical capacity to deploy CDR. Allocating global CDR to countries based on these principles suggests that CDR will, on average, represent ∼4% of nations’ total emissions in 2030, rising to ∼17% in 2040. Moreover, equitable allocations of CDR, in many cases, exceed implied land and carbon storage capacities. We estimate ∼15% of countries (25) would have insufficient land to contribute an equitable share of global CDR, and ∼40% of countries (71) would have insufficient geological storage capacity. Unless more diverse CDR technologies are developed, the mismatch between CDR liabilities and land-based CDR capacities will lead to global demand for six GtCO(2) carbon credits from 2020 to 2050. This demonstrates an imperative demand for international carbon trading of CDR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10659237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106592372023-10-01 The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity Yang, Pu Mi, Zhifu Wei, Yi-Ming Hanssen, Steef V Liu, Lan-Cui Coffman, D’Maris Sun, Xinlu Liao, Hua Yao, Yun-Fei Kang, Jia-Ning Wang, Peng-Tao Davis, Steven J Natl Sci Rev Research Article Limiting climate change to 1.5°C and achieving net-zero emissions would entail substantial carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere by the mid-century, but how much CDR is needed at country level over time is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed description of when and how much CDR is required at country level in order to achieve 1.5°C and how much CDR countries can carry out domestically. We allocate global CDR pathways among 170 countries according to 6 equity principles and assess these allocations with respect to countries’ biophysical and geophysical capacity to deploy CDR. Allocating global CDR to countries based on these principles suggests that CDR will, on average, represent ∼4% of nations’ total emissions in 2030, rising to ∼17% in 2040. Moreover, equitable allocations of CDR, in many cases, exceed implied land and carbon storage capacities. We estimate ∼15% of countries (25) would have insufficient land to contribute an equitable share of global CDR, and ∼40% of countries (71) would have insufficient geological storage capacity. Unless more diverse CDR technologies are developed, the mismatch between CDR liabilities and land-based CDR capacities will lead to global demand for six GtCO(2) carbon credits from 2020 to 2050. This demonstrates an imperative demand for international carbon trading of CDR. Oxford University Press 2023-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10659237/ /pubmed/38021166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad254 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Pu
Mi, Zhifu
Wei, Yi-Ming
Hanssen, Steef V
Liu, Lan-Cui
Coffman, D’Maris
Sun, Xinlu
Liao, Hua
Yao, Yun-Fei
Kang, Jia-Ning
Wang, Peng-Tao
Davis, Steven J
The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity
title The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity
title_full The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity
title_fullStr The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity
title_full_unstemmed The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity
title_short The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity
title_sort global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad254
work_keys_str_mv AT yangpu theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT mizhifu theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT weiyiming theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT hanssensteefv theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT liulancui theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT coffmandmaris theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT sunxinlu theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT liaohua theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT yaoyunfei theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT kangjianing theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT wangpengtao theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT davisstevenj theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT yangpu globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT mizhifu globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT weiyiming globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT hanssensteefv globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT liulancui globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT coffmandmaris globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT sunxinlu globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT liaohua globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT yaoyunfei globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT kangjianing globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT wangpengtao globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity
AT davisstevenj globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity