Cargando…
The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity
Limiting climate change to 1.5°C and achieving net-zero emissions would entail substantial carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere by the mid-century, but how much CDR is needed at country level over time is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed description of when and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad254 |
_version_ | 1785137555129237504 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Pu Mi, Zhifu Wei, Yi-Ming Hanssen, Steef V Liu, Lan-Cui Coffman, D’Maris Sun, Xinlu Liao, Hua Yao, Yun-Fei Kang, Jia-Ning Wang, Peng-Tao Davis, Steven J |
author_facet | Yang, Pu Mi, Zhifu Wei, Yi-Ming Hanssen, Steef V Liu, Lan-Cui Coffman, D’Maris Sun, Xinlu Liao, Hua Yao, Yun-Fei Kang, Jia-Ning Wang, Peng-Tao Davis, Steven J |
author_sort | Yang, Pu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Limiting climate change to 1.5°C and achieving net-zero emissions would entail substantial carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere by the mid-century, but how much CDR is needed at country level over time is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed description of when and how much CDR is required at country level in order to achieve 1.5°C and how much CDR countries can carry out domestically. We allocate global CDR pathways among 170 countries according to 6 equity principles and assess these allocations with respect to countries’ biophysical and geophysical capacity to deploy CDR. Allocating global CDR to countries based on these principles suggests that CDR will, on average, represent ∼4% of nations’ total emissions in 2030, rising to ∼17% in 2040. Moreover, equitable allocations of CDR, in many cases, exceed implied land and carbon storage capacities. We estimate ∼15% of countries (25) would have insufficient land to contribute an equitable share of global CDR, and ∼40% of countries (71) would have insufficient geological storage capacity. Unless more diverse CDR technologies are developed, the mismatch between CDR liabilities and land-based CDR capacities will lead to global demand for six GtCO(2) carbon credits from 2020 to 2050. This demonstrates an imperative demand for international carbon trading of CDR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10659237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106592372023-10-01 The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity Yang, Pu Mi, Zhifu Wei, Yi-Ming Hanssen, Steef V Liu, Lan-Cui Coffman, D’Maris Sun, Xinlu Liao, Hua Yao, Yun-Fei Kang, Jia-Ning Wang, Peng-Tao Davis, Steven J Natl Sci Rev Research Article Limiting climate change to 1.5°C and achieving net-zero emissions would entail substantial carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere by the mid-century, but how much CDR is needed at country level over time is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed description of when and how much CDR is required at country level in order to achieve 1.5°C and how much CDR countries can carry out domestically. We allocate global CDR pathways among 170 countries according to 6 equity principles and assess these allocations with respect to countries’ biophysical and geophysical capacity to deploy CDR. Allocating global CDR to countries based on these principles suggests that CDR will, on average, represent ∼4% of nations’ total emissions in 2030, rising to ∼17% in 2040. Moreover, equitable allocations of CDR, in many cases, exceed implied land and carbon storage capacities. We estimate ∼15% of countries (25) would have insufficient land to contribute an equitable share of global CDR, and ∼40% of countries (71) would have insufficient geological storage capacity. Unless more diverse CDR technologies are developed, the mismatch between CDR liabilities and land-based CDR capacities will lead to global demand for six GtCO(2) carbon credits from 2020 to 2050. This demonstrates an imperative demand for international carbon trading of CDR. Oxford University Press 2023-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10659237/ /pubmed/38021166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad254 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Pu Mi, Zhifu Wei, Yi-Ming Hanssen, Steef V Liu, Lan-Cui Coffman, D’Maris Sun, Xinlu Liao, Hua Yao, Yun-Fei Kang, Jia-Ning Wang, Peng-Tao Davis, Steven J The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity |
title | The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity |
title_full | The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity |
title_fullStr | The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity |
title_full_unstemmed | The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity |
title_short | The global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity |
title_sort | global mismatch between equitable carbon dioxide removal liability and capacity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwad254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangpu theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT mizhifu theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT weiyiming theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT hanssensteefv theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT liulancui theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT coffmandmaris theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT sunxinlu theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT liaohua theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT yaoyunfei theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT kangjianing theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT wangpengtao theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT davisstevenj theglobalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT yangpu globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT mizhifu globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT weiyiming globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT hanssensteefv globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT liulancui globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT coffmandmaris globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT sunxinlu globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT liaohua globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT yaoyunfei globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT kangjianing globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT wangpengtao globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity AT davisstevenj globalmismatchbetweenequitablecarbondioxideremovalliabilityandcapacity |