Cargando…

Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a reading task

The visual word form area in the occipitotemporal sulcus (OTS), here referred to as OTS-words, responds more strongly to text than other visual stimuli and plays a critical role in reading. Here we hypothesized, that this region’s preference for text may be driven by a preference for reading tasks,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalski, Alexia, Kular, Holly, Jorgensen, Julia G., Grill-Spector, Kalanit, Grotheer, Mareike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.07.565794
_version_ 1785148308229980160
author Dalski, Alexia
Kular, Holly
Jorgensen, Julia G.
Grill-Spector, Kalanit
Grotheer, Mareike
author_facet Dalski, Alexia
Kular, Holly
Jorgensen, Julia G.
Grill-Spector, Kalanit
Grotheer, Mareike
author_sort Dalski, Alexia
collection PubMed
description The visual word form area in the occipitotemporal sulcus (OTS), here referred to as OTS-words, responds more strongly to text than other visual stimuli and plays a critical role in reading. Here we hypothesized, that this region’s preference for text may be driven by a preference for reading tasks, as in most prior fMRI studies only the text stimuli were readable. To test this, we performed three fMRI experiments (N=15) and systematically varied the participant’s task and the visual stimulus, investigating mOTS-words and pOTS-words subregions. In experiment 1, we contrasted text stimuli with non-readable visual stimuli (faces, limbs, houses, and objects). In experiment 2, we used an fMRI adaptation paradigm, presenting the same or different compound words in text or emoji formats. In experiment 3, participants performed either a reading or a color task on compound words, presented in text or emoji format. Using experiment 1 data, we identified left mOTS-words and pOTS-words in all participants by contrasting text stimuli with non-readable stimuli. In experiment 2, pOTS-words, but not mOTS-words, showed fMRI adaptation for compound words in both text and emoji formats. In experiment 3, surprisingly, both mOTS-words and pOTS-words showed higher responses to compound words in emoji than text format. Moreover, mOTS-words, but not pOTS-words, also showed higher responses during the reading than the color task as well as an interaction between task and stimulus. Multivariate analyses showed that distributed responses in pOTS-words encode the visual stimulus, whereas distributed responses in mOTS-words encode both the stimulus and the task. Together, our findings suggest that the function of the OTS-words subregions goes beyond the specific visual processing of text and that these regions are flexibly recruited whenever semantic meaning needs to be assigned to visual input.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10659328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106593282023-11-20 Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a reading task Dalski, Alexia Kular, Holly Jorgensen, Julia G. Grill-Spector, Kalanit Grotheer, Mareike bioRxiv Article The visual word form area in the occipitotemporal sulcus (OTS), here referred to as OTS-words, responds more strongly to text than other visual stimuli and plays a critical role in reading. Here we hypothesized, that this region’s preference for text may be driven by a preference for reading tasks, as in most prior fMRI studies only the text stimuli were readable. To test this, we performed three fMRI experiments (N=15) and systematically varied the participant’s task and the visual stimulus, investigating mOTS-words and pOTS-words subregions. In experiment 1, we contrasted text stimuli with non-readable visual stimuli (faces, limbs, houses, and objects). In experiment 2, we used an fMRI adaptation paradigm, presenting the same or different compound words in text or emoji formats. In experiment 3, participants performed either a reading or a color task on compound words, presented in text or emoji format. Using experiment 1 data, we identified left mOTS-words and pOTS-words in all participants by contrasting text stimuli with non-readable stimuli. In experiment 2, pOTS-words, but not mOTS-words, showed fMRI adaptation for compound words in both text and emoji formats. In experiment 3, surprisingly, both mOTS-words and pOTS-words showed higher responses to compound words in emoji than text format. Moreover, mOTS-words, but not pOTS-words, also showed higher responses during the reading than the color task as well as an interaction between task and stimulus. Multivariate analyses showed that distributed responses in pOTS-words encode the visual stimulus, whereas distributed responses in mOTS-words encode both the stimulus and the task. Together, our findings suggest that the function of the OTS-words subregions goes beyond the specific visual processing of text and that these regions are flexibly recruited whenever semantic meaning needs to be assigned to visual input. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10659328/ /pubmed/37986766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.07.565794 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Dalski, Alexia
Kular, Holly
Jorgensen, Julia G.
Grill-Spector, Kalanit
Grotheer, Mareike
Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a reading task
title Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a reading task
title_full Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a reading task
title_fullStr Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a reading task
title_full_unstemmed Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a reading task
title_short Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a reading task
title_sort both mots-words and pots-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a reading task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.07.565794
work_keys_str_mv AT dalskialexia bothmotswordsandpotswordspreferemojistimuliovertextstimuliduringareadingtask
AT kularholly bothmotswordsandpotswordspreferemojistimuliovertextstimuliduringareadingtask
AT jorgensenjuliag bothmotswordsandpotswordspreferemojistimuliovertextstimuliduringareadingtask
AT grillspectorkalanit bothmotswordsandpotswordspreferemojistimuliovertextstimuliduringareadingtask
AT grotheermareike bothmotswordsandpotswordspreferemojistimuliovertextstimuliduringareadingtask