Cargando…

Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Induction of labour has remained one of the most valuable interventions in obstetric practice. Over the years, the proportion of women undergoing induction of labour (IOL) has been on a steady increase. The significance to obstetrics practice as well as its maternal and perinatal outcome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro, Eleje, George Uchenna, Okafor, Chigozie Geoffrey, Okechukwu, Zebulon Chiawolamoke, Eke, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem, Okoro, Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem, Okafor, Lazarus Ugochukwu, Okafor, Chidinma Charity, Ogabido, Chukwudi Anthony, Njoku, Tobechi Kingsley, Onyejiaka, Chukwudubem Chinagorom, Egwim, Adanna Vivian, Obiagwu, Hillary Ikechukwu, Mamah, JohnBosco Emmanuel, Olisa, Chinedu Lawrence, Onah, Nnanyerugo Livinus, Udigwe, Gerald Okanandu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37987020
http://dx.doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i07/1706
_version_ 1785148342722887680
author Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro
Eleje, George Uchenna
Okafor, Chigozie Geoffrey
Okechukwu, Zebulon Chiawolamoke
Eke, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem
Okoro, Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem
Okafor, Lazarus Ugochukwu
Okafor, Chidinma Charity
Ogabido, Chukwudi Anthony
Njoku, Tobechi Kingsley
Onyejiaka, Chukwudubem Chinagorom
Egwim, Adanna Vivian
Obiagwu, Hillary Ikechukwu
Mamah, JohnBosco Emmanuel
Olisa, Chinedu Lawrence
Onah, Nnanyerugo Livinus
Udigwe, Gerald Okanandu
author_facet Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro
Eleje, George Uchenna
Okafor, Chigozie Geoffrey
Okechukwu, Zebulon Chiawolamoke
Eke, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem
Okoro, Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem
Okafor, Lazarus Ugochukwu
Okafor, Chidinma Charity
Ogabido, Chukwudi Anthony
Njoku, Tobechi Kingsley
Onyejiaka, Chukwudubem Chinagorom
Egwim, Adanna Vivian
Obiagwu, Hillary Ikechukwu
Mamah, JohnBosco Emmanuel
Olisa, Chinedu Lawrence
Onah, Nnanyerugo Livinus
Udigwe, Gerald Okanandu
author_sort Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Induction of labour has remained one of the most valuable interventions in obstetric practice. Over the years, the proportion of women undergoing induction of labour (IOL) has been on a steady increase. The significance to obstetrics practice as well as its maternal and perinatal outcomes are sacrosanct, hence the need for its periodic review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the obstetric outcomes of induction of labour. METHODS: A five-year retrospective study of all cases of induction of labour at the maternity unit of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH), Nnewi, Nigeria between January 1st 2017 and 31st December 2021. The labour ward’s records were assessed to determine the total number of women who had induction of labour during the study period. Women whose case files could be not retrieved were excluded. The folder numbers of the patients were extracted and their case files retrieved from the medical records department of the hospital. The primary outcomes measures were the indications and the methods of induction of labour, while the secondary outcome measures were the mode of delivery, cause of failed induction, and the perinatal outcome. Data were obtained using proformas and analysed using statistical packages for social sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 IBM corporation. RESULT: A total of 3,638 deliveries were taken during the period under review and 168 patients had induction of labour giving an overall prevalence of 4.6% (46/1000 deliveries). Induction of labour was successful in 71.2% of cases. Misoprostol was used in 90.4% of cases as an induction agent. The commonest indication for induction of labour was postdate pregnancy (53.8%). Failed induction was due to fetal distress, poor progress of labour from cephalopelvic disproportion/malposition and failed cervical ripening. In about 72% of deliveries, there was good perinatal outcome, 10.3% of babies had moderate to severe asphyxia while 1.3% had neonatal death. CONCLUSION: Induction of labour is a safe and beneficial procedure in obstetrics. However, it can be associated with adverse obstetric outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10659585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106595852023-11-20 Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro Eleje, George Uchenna Okafor, Chigozie Geoffrey Okechukwu, Zebulon Chiawolamoke Eke, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem Okoro, Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem Okafor, Lazarus Ugochukwu Okafor, Chidinma Charity Ogabido, Chukwudi Anthony Njoku, Tobechi Kingsley Onyejiaka, Chukwudubem Chinagorom Egwim, Adanna Vivian Obiagwu, Hillary Ikechukwu Mamah, JohnBosco Emmanuel Olisa, Chinedu Lawrence Onah, Nnanyerugo Livinus Udigwe, Gerald Okanandu Int J Innov Res Med Sci Article BACKGROUND: Induction of labour has remained one of the most valuable interventions in obstetric practice. Over the years, the proportion of women undergoing induction of labour (IOL) has been on a steady increase. The significance to obstetrics practice as well as its maternal and perinatal outcomes are sacrosanct, hence the need for its periodic review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the obstetric outcomes of induction of labour. METHODS: A five-year retrospective study of all cases of induction of labour at the maternity unit of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH), Nnewi, Nigeria between January 1st 2017 and 31st December 2021. The labour ward’s records were assessed to determine the total number of women who had induction of labour during the study period. Women whose case files could be not retrieved were excluded. The folder numbers of the patients were extracted and their case files retrieved from the medical records department of the hospital. The primary outcomes measures were the indications and the methods of induction of labour, while the secondary outcome measures were the mode of delivery, cause of failed induction, and the perinatal outcome. Data were obtained using proformas and analysed using statistical packages for social sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 IBM corporation. RESULT: A total of 3,638 deliveries were taken during the period under review and 168 patients had induction of labour giving an overall prevalence of 4.6% (46/1000 deliveries). Induction of labour was successful in 71.2% of cases. Misoprostol was used in 90.4% of cases as an induction agent. The commonest indication for induction of labour was postdate pregnancy (53.8%). Failed induction was due to fetal distress, poor progress of labour from cephalopelvic disproportion/malposition and failed cervical ripening. In about 72% of deliveries, there was good perinatal outcome, 10.3% of babies had moderate to severe asphyxia while 1.3% had neonatal death. CONCLUSION: Induction of labour is a safe and beneficial procedure in obstetrics. However, it can be associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. 2023-07-08 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10659585/ /pubmed/37987020 http://dx.doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i07/1706 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro
Eleje, George Uchenna
Okafor, Chigozie Geoffrey
Okechukwu, Zebulon Chiawolamoke
Eke, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem
Okoro, Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem
Okafor, Lazarus Ugochukwu
Okafor, Chidinma Charity
Ogabido, Chukwudi Anthony
Njoku, Tobechi Kingsley
Onyejiaka, Chukwudubem Chinagorom
Egwim, Adanna Vivian
Obiagwu, Hillary Ikechukwu
Mamah, JohnBosco Emmanuel
Olisa, Chinedu Lawrence
Onah, Nnanyerugo Livinus
Udigwe, Gerald Okanandu
Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort obstetric outcome of induction of labour in a tertiary hospital in nigeria: a five-year retrospective cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37987020
http://dx.doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i07/1706
work_keys_str_mv AT ugwuorokoharrisonchiro obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT elejegeorgeuchenna obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT okaforchigoziegeoffrey obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT okechukwuzebulonchiawolamoke obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT ekeahizechukwuchigoziem obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT okorochukwuemekachukwubuikem obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT okaforlazarusugochukwu obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT okaforchidinmacharity obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT ogabidochukwudianthony obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT njokutobechikingsley obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT onyejiakachukwudubemchinagorom obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT egwimadannavivian obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT obiagwuhillaryikechukwu obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT mamahjohnboscoemmanuel obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT olisachinedulawrence obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT onahnnanyerugolivinus obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT udigwegeraldokanandu obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy