Cargando…
Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
BACKGROUND: Induction of labour has remained one of the most valuable interventions in obstetric practice. Over the years, the proportion of women undergoing induction of labour (IOL) has been on a steady increase. The significance to obstetrics practice as well as its maternal and perinatal outcome...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37987020 http://dx.doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i07/1706 |
_version_ | 1785148342722887680 |
---|---|
author | Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro Eleje, George Uchenna Okafor, Chigozie Geoffrey Okechukwu, Zebulon Chiawolamoke Eke, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem Okoro, Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem Okafor, Lazarus Ugochukwu Okafor, Chidinma Charity Ogabido, Chukwudi Anthony Njoku, Tobechi Kingsley Onyejiaka, Chukwudubem Chinagorom Egwim, Adanna Vivian Obiagwu, Hillary Ikechukwu Mamah, JohnBosco Emmanuel Olisa, Chinedu Lawrence Onah, Nnanyerugo Livinus Udigwe, Gerald Okanandu |
author_facet | Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro Eleje, George Uchenna Okafor, Chigozie Geoffrey Okechukwu, Zebulon Chiawolamoke Eke, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem Okoro, Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem Okafor, Lazarus Ugochukwu Okafor, Chidinma Charity Ogabido, Chukwudi Anthony Njoku, Tobechi Kingsley Onyejiaka, Chukwudubem Chinagorom Egwim, Adanna Vivian Obiagwu, Hillary Ikechukwu Mamah, JohnBosco Emmanuel Olisa, Chinedu Lawrence Onah, Nnanyerugo Livinus Udigwe, Gerald Okanandu |
author_sort | Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Induction of labour has remained one of the most valuable interventions in obstetric practice. Over the years, the proportion of women undergoing induction of labour (IOL) has been on a steady increase. The significance to obstetrics practice as well as its maternal and perinatal outcomes are sacrosanct, hence the need for its periodic review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the obstetric outcomes of induction of labour. METHODS: A five-year retrospective study of all cases of induction of labour at the maternity unit of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH), Nnewi, Nigeria between January 1st 2017 and 31st December 2021. The labour ward’s records were assessed to determine the total number of women who had induction of labour during the study period. Women whose case files could be not retrieved were excluded. The folder numbers of the patients were extracted and their case files retrieved from the medical records department of the hospital. The primary outcomes measures were the indications and the methods of induction of labour, while the secondary outcome measures were the mode of delivery, cause of failed induction, and the perinatal outcome. Data were obtained using proformas and analysed using statistical packages for social sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 IBM corporation. RESULT: A total of 3,638 deliveries were taken during the period under review and 168 patients had induction of labour giving an overall prevalence of 4.6% (46/1000 deliveries). Induction of labour was successful in 71.2% of cases. Misoprostol was used in 90.4% of cases as an induction agent. The commonest indication for induction of labour was postdate pregnancy (53.8%). Failed induction was due to fetal distress, poor progress of labour from cephalopelvic disproportion/malposition and failed cervical ripening. In about 72% of deliveries, there was good perinatal outcome, 10.3% of babies had moderate to severe asphyxia while 1.3% had neonatal death. CONCLUSION: Induction of labour is a safe and beneficial procedure in obstetrics. However, it can be associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10659585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106595852023-11-20 Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro Eleje, George Uchenna Okafor, Chigozie Geoffrey Okechukwu, Zebulon Chiawolamoke Eke, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem Okoro, Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem Okafor, Lazarus Ugochukwu Okafor, Chidinma Charity Ogabido, Chukwudi Anthony Njoku, Tobechi Kingsley Onyejiaka, Chukwudubem Chinagorom Egwim, Adanna Vivian Obiagwu, Hillary Ikechukwu Mamah, JohnBosco Emmanuel Olisa, Chinedu Lawrence Onah, Nnanyerugo Livinus Udigwe, Gerald Okanandu Int J Innov Res Med Sci Article BACKGROUND: Induction of labour has remained one of the most valuable interventions in obstetric practice. Over the years, the proportion of women undergoing induction of labour (IOL) has been on a steady increase. The significance to obstetrics practice as well as its maternal and perinatal outcomes are sacrosanct, hence the need for its periodic review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the obstetric outcomes of induction of labour. METHODS: A five-year retrospective study of all cases of induction of labour at the maternity unit of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH), Nnewi, Nigeria between January 1st 2017 and 31st December 2021. The labour ward’s records were assessed to determine the total number of women who had induction of labour during the study period. Women whose case files could be not retrieved were excluded. The folder numbers of the patients were extracted and their case files retrieved from the medical records department of the hospital. The primary outcomes measures were the indications and the methods of induction of labour, while the secondary outcome measures were the mode of delivery, cause of failed induction, and the perinatal outcome. Data were obtained using proformas and analysed using statistical packages for social sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 IBM corporation. RESULT: A total of 3,638 deliveries were taken during the period under review and 168 patients had induction of labour giving an overall prevalence of 4.6% (46/1000 deliveries). Induction of labour was successful in 71.2% of cases. Misoprostol was used in 90.4% of cases as an induction agent. The commonest indication for induction of labour was postdate pregnancy (53.8%). Failed induction was due to fetal distress, poor progress of labour from cephalopelvic disproportion/malposition and failed cervical ripening. In about 72% of deliveries, there was good perinatal outcome, 10.3% of babies had moderate to severe asphyxia while 1.3% had neonatal death. CONCLUSION: Induction of labour is a safe and beneficial procedure in obstetrics. However, it can be associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. 2023-07-08 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10659585/ /pubmed/37987020 http://dx.doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i07/1706 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Ugwuoroko, Harrison Chiro Eleje, George Uchenna Okafor, Chigozie Geoffrey Okechukwu, Zebulon Chiawolamoke Eke, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem Okoro, Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem Okafor, Lazarus Ugochukwu Okafor, Chidinma Charity Ogabido, Chukwudi Anthony Njoku, Tobechi Kingsley Onyejiaka, Chukwudubem Chinagorom Egwim, Adanna Vivian Obiagwu, Hillary Ikechukwu Mamah, JohnBosco Emmanuel Olisa, Chinedu Lawrence Onah, Nnanyerugo Livinus Udigwe, Gerald Okanandu Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Obstetric Outcome of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: A Five-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | obstetric outcome of induction of labour in a tertiary hospital in nigeria: a five-year retrospective cross-sectional study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37987020 http://dx.doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i07/1706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ugwuorokoharrisonchiro obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT elejegeorgeuchenna obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT okaforchigoziegeoffrey obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT okechukwuzebulonchiawolamoke obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT ekeahizechukwuchigoziem obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT okorochukwuemekachukwubuikem obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT okaforlazarusugochukwu obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT okaforchidinmacharity obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT ogabidochukwudianthony obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT njokutobechikingsley obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT onyejiakachukwudubemchinagorom obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT egwimadannavivian obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT obiagwuhillaryikechukwu obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT mamahjohnboscoemmanuel obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT olisachinedulawrence obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT onahnnanyerugolivinus obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT udigwegeraldokanandu obstetricoutcomeofinductionoflabourinatertiaryhospitalinnigeriaafiveyearretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy |