Evaluation of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Stress Fractures to Reduce the Time to Return to Sport or Activity in the Physically Active Population: A Systematic Review

Stress fractures are a common and significant source of pain and burden that can require long periods of rest from physical activity to allow adequate healing. Specifically in athletes or those with physically demanding occupations, the prolonged period of rest and the potential for requiring surgical intervention in the case of poor or delayed healing can have devastating impacts on these individuals’ careers and socioeconomic well-being. In this population, successful healing, in addition to a quicker healing time and a sooner return to activity, are important outcomes when faced with treating stress fractures. The use of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) to accelerate bone healing has been a topic of investigation, though little research has explored the use of LIPUS specifically in the physically active population. The purpose of this study was to review the existing literature on the use of LIPUS for stress fracture healing in the physically active population with the outcome of a quicker return to sport or physical duties. The PubMed and Embase databases were screened for relevant articles using defined Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Two independent researchers screened articles using PICOS criteria for inclusion in the review. Data were independently extracted regarding study and population characteristics as well as outcome measures, including time to healing of fractures and time to return to sport or physical activity. Five studies were ultimately included in the systematic review. One study investigated the use of LIPUS in pediatric athletes with spondylolysis, while four studies investigated lower extremity stress fractures in adult populations. All reported the outcomes of either rate or time to healing and ability to return to sport or activity. One study found a statistically significant improvement in the rate of bone union in the intervention group undergoing LIPUS compared to the control. Two studies found a statistically significant decrease in the time to resolution of symptoms, allowing an earlier return to sport or physical duties. Two studies found no difference in the time to healing or success rate of healing between the LIPUS group and the control group. This review of the literature suggests that the use of LIPUS for the treatment of stress fractures in the athletic or physically active population has the potential to expedite the resolution of symptoms and return to activity. Due to the heterogeneity of the existing studies, more research is needed to definitively determine the most appropriate clinical application of LIPUS and its most effective ultrasound settings. Further research should be directed toward more controlled studies specifically investigating the athletic and physically active population.