Cargando…

Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects

Flowers come in a variety of colours, shapes, sizes and odours. Flowers also differ in the quality and quantity of nutritional reward they provide to entice potential pollinators to visit. Given this diversity, generalist flower‐visiting insects face the considerable challenge of deciding which flow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, Kathryn M., Richardson, Freya J., Forster, Caitlyn Y., Middleton, Eliza J. T., White, Thomas E., Burke, Paul F., Latty, Tanya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10687
_version_ 1785137645377028096
author Chapman, Kathryn M.
Richardson, Freya J.
Forster, Caitlyn Y.
Middleton, Eliza J. T.
White, Thomas E.
Burke, Paul F.
Latty, Tanya
author_facet Chapman, Kathryn M.
Richardson, Freya J.
Forster, Caitlyn Y.
Middleton, Eliza J. T.
White, Thomas E.
Burke, Paul F.
Latty, Tanya
author_sort Chapman, Kathryn M.
collection PubMed
description Flowers come in a variety of colours, shapes, sizes and odours. Flowers also differ in the quality and quantity of nutritional reward they provide to entice potential pollinators to visit. Given this diversity, generalist flower‐visiting insects face the considerable challenge of deciding which flowers to feed on and which to ignore. Working with real flowers poses logistical challenges due to correlations between flower traits, maintenance costs and uncontrolled variables. Here, we overcome this challenge by designing multimodal artificial flowers that varied in visual, olfactory and reward attributes. We used artificial flowers to investigate the impact of seven floral attributes (three visual cues, two olfactory cues and two rewarding attributes) on flower visitation and species richness. We investigated how flower attributes influenced two phases of the decision‐making process: the decision to land on a flower, and the decision to feed on a flower. Artificial flowers attracted 890 individual insects representing 15 morphospecies spanning seven arthropod orders. Honeybees were the most common visitors accounting for 46% of visitors. Higher visitation rates were driven by the presence of nectar, the presence of linalool, flower shape and flower colour and was negatively impacted by the presence of citral. Species richness was driven by the presence of nectar, the presence of linalool and flower colour. For hymenopterans, the probability of landing on the artificial flowers was influenced by the presence of nectar or pollen, shape and the presence of citral and/or linalool. The probability of feeding increased when flowers contained nectar. For dipterans, the probability of landing on artificial flowers increased when the flower was yellow and contained linalool. The probability of feeding increased when flowers contained pollen, nectar and linalool. Our results demonstrate the multi‐attribute nature of flower preferences and highlight the usefulness of artificial flowers as tools for studying flower visitation in wild insects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10659823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106598232023-11-01 Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects Chapman, Kathryn M. Richardson, Freya J. Forster, Caitlyn Y. Middleton, Eliza J. T. White, Thomas E. Burke, Paul F. Latty, Tanya Ecol Evol Research Articles Flowers come in a variety of colours, shapes, sizes and odours. Flowers also differ in the quality and quantity of nutritional reward they provide to entice potential pollinators to visit. Given this diversity, generalist flower‐visiting insects face the considerable challenge of deciding which flowers to feed on and which to ignore. Working with real flowers poses logistical challenges due to correlations between flower traits, maintenance costs and uncontrolled variables. Here, we overcome this challenge by designing multimodal artificial flowers that varied in visual, olfactory and reward attributes. We used artificial flowers to investigate the impact of seven floral attributes (three visual cues, two olfactory cues and two rewarding attributes) on flower visitation and species richness. We investigated how flower attributes influenced two phases of the decision‐making process: the decision to land on a flower, and the decision to feed on a flower. Artificial flowers attracted 890 individual insects representing 15 morphospecies spanning seven arthropod orders. Honeybees were the most common visitors accounting for 46% of visitors. Higher visitation rates were driven by the presence of nectar, the presence of linalool, flower shape and flower colour and was negatively impacted by the presence of citral. Species richness was driven by the presence of nectar, the presence of linalool and flower colour. For hymenopterans, the probability of landing on the artificial flowers was influenced by the presence of nectar or pollen, shape and the presence of citral and/or linalool. The probability of feeding increased when flowers contained nectar. For dipterans, the probability of landing on artificial flowers increased when the flower was yellow and contained linalool. The probability of feeding increased when flowers contained pollen, nectar and linalool. Our results demonstrate the multi‐attribute nature of flower preferences and highlight the usefulness of artificial flowers as tools for studying flower visitation in wild insects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10659823/ /pubmed/38020672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10687 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Chapman, Kathryn M.
Richardson, Freya J.
Forster, Caitlyn Y.
Middleton, Eliza J. T.
White, Thomas E.
Burke, Paul F.
Latty, Tanya
Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects
title Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects
title_full Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects
title_fullStr Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects
title_full_unstemmed Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects
title_short Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects
title_sort artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10687
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmankathrynm artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects
AT richardsonfreyaj artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects
AT forstercaitlyny artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects
AT middletonelizajt artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects
AT whitethomase artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects
AT burkepaulf artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects
AT lattytanya artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects