Cargando…
Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects
Flowers come in a variety of colours, shapes, sizes and odours. Flowers also differ in the quality and quantity of nutritional reward they provide to entice potential pollinators to visit. Given this diversity, generalist flower‐visiting insects face the considerable challenge of deciding which flow...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10687 |
_version_ | 1785137645377028096 |
---|---|
author | Chapman, Kathryn M. Richardson, Freya J. Forster, Caitlyn Y. Middleton, Eliza J. T. White, Thomas E. Burke, Paul F. Latty, Tanya |
author_facet | Chapman, Kathryn M. Richardson, Freya J. Forster, Caitlyn Y. Middleton, Eliza J. T. White, Thomas E. Burke, Paul F. Latty, Tanya |
author_sort | Chapman, Kathryn M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Flowers come in a variety of colours, shapes, sizes and odours. Flowers also differ in the quality and quantity of nutritional reward they provide to entice potential pollinators to visit. Given this diversity, generalist flower‐visiting insects face the considerable challenge of deciding which flowers to feed on and which to ignore. Working with real flowers poses logistical challenges due to correlations between flower traits, maintenance costs and uncontrolled variables. Here, we overcome this challenge by designing multimodal artificial flowers that varied in visual, olfactory and reward attributes. We used artificial flowers to investigate the impact of seven floral attributes (three visual cues, two olfactory cues and two rewarding attributes) on flower visitation and species richness. We investigated how flower attributes influenced two phases of the decision‐making process: the decision to land on a flower, and the decision to feed on a flower. Artificial flowers attracted 890 individual insects representing 15 morphospecies spanning seven arthropod orders. Honeybees were the most common visitors accounting for 46% of visitors. Higher visitation rates were driven by the presence of nectar, the presence of linalool, flower shape and flower colour and was negatively impacted by the presence of citral. Species richness was driven by the presence of nectar, the presence of linalool and flower colour. For hymenopterans, the probability of landing on the artificial flowers was influenced by the presence of nectar or pollen, shape and the presence of citral and/or linalool. The probability of feeding increased when flowers contained nectar. For dipterans, the probability of landing on artificial flowers increased when the flower was yellow and contained linalool. The probability of feeding increased when flowers contained pollen, nectar and linalool. Our results demonstrate the multi‐attribute nature of flower preferences and highlight the usefulness of artificial flowers as tools for studying flower visitation in wild insects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10659823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106598232023-11-01 Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects Chapman, Kathryn M. Richardson, Freya J. Forster, Caitlyn Y. Middleton, Eliza J. T. White, Thomas E. Burke, Paul F. Latty, Tanya Ecol Evol Research Articles Flowers come in a variety of colours, shapes, sizes and odours. Flowers also differ in the quality and quantity of nutritional reward they provide to entice potential pollinators to visit. Given this diversity, generalist flower‐visiting insects face the considerable challenge of deciding which flowers to feed on and which to ignore. Working with real flowers poses logistical challenges due to correlations between flower traits, maintenance costs and uncontrolled variables. Here, we overcome this challenge by designing multimodal artificial flowers that varied in visual, olfactory and reward attributes. We used artificial flowers to investigate the impact of seven floral attributes (three visual cues, two olfactory cues and two rewarding attributes) on flower visitation and species richness. We investigated how flower attributes influenced two phases of the decision‐making process: the decision to land on a flower, and the decision to feed on a flower. Artificial flowers attracted 890 individual insects representing 15 morphospecies spanning seven arthropod orders. Honeybees were the most common visitors accounting for 46% of visitors. Higher visitation rates were driven by the presence of nectar, the presence of linalool, flower shape and flower colour and was negatively impacted by the presence of citral. Species richness was driven by the presence of nectar, the presence of linalool and flower colour. For hymenopterans, the probability of landing on the artificial flowers was influenced by the presence of nectar or pollen, shape and the presence of citral and/or linalool. The probability of feeding increased when flowers contained nectar. For dipterans, the probability of landing on artificial flowers increased when the flower was yellow and contained linalool. The probability of feeding increased when flowers contained pollen, nectar and linalool. Our results demonstrate the multi‐attribute nature of flower preferences and highlight the usefulness of artificial flowers as tools for studying flower visitation in wild insects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10659823/ /pubmed/38020672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10687 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Chapman, Kathryn M. Richardson, Freya J. Forster, Caitlyn Y. Middleton, Eliza J. T. White, Thomas E. Burke, Paul F. Latty, Tanya Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects |
title | Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects |
title_full | Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects |
title_fullStr | Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects |
title_short | Artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects |
title_sort | artificial flowers as a tool for investigating multimodal flower choice in wild insects |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10687 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chapmankathrynm artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects AT richardsonfreyaj artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects AT forstercaitlyny artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects AT middletonelizajt artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects AT whitethomase artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects AT burkepaulf artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects AT lattytanya artificialflowersasatoolforinvestigatingmultimodalflowerchoiceinwildinsects |