Cargando…
A comparison of the prognostic performance of the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 response criteria in patients with NHL from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials
The Lugano 2014 criteria are the standard for response assessment in lymphoma. We compared the prognostic performance of Lugano 2014 and the more recently developed response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017), which relies primarily on computed tomography and uses unidimensional measuremen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.796 |
_version_ | 1785137748523352064 |
---|---|
author | Kostakoglu, Lale Martelli, Maurizio Sehn, Laurie H. Davies, Andrew Trněný, Marek Herold, Michael Vitolo, Umberto Hiddemann, Wolfgang Trotman, Judith Knapp, Andrea Mattiello, Federico Nielsen, Tina G. Sahin, Deniz Sellam, Gila Ward, Carol Younes, Anas |
author_facet | Kostakoglu, Lale Martelli, Maurizio Sehn, Laurie H. Davies, Andrew Trněný, Marek Herold, Michael Vitolo, Umberto Hiddemann, Wolfgang Trotman, Judith Knapp, Andrea Mattiello, Federico Nielsen, Tina G. Sahin, Deniz Sellam, Gila Ward, Carol Younes, Anas |
author_sort | Kostakoglu, Lale |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Lugano 2014 criteria are the standard for response assessment in lymphoma. We compared the prognostic performance of Lugano 2014 and the more recently developed response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017), which relies primarily on computed tomography and uses unidimensional measurements, in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials, respectively. Concordance between responses according to the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 criteria was analyzed. Landmark analyses of progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by end of treatment (EOT) and end of induction (EOI) response status according to RECIL 2017 and Lugano 2014 criteria, and prognostic value of response at EOT/EOI were also compared. Overall, 1333 patients were included from GOYA and 502 from GALLIUM. Complete response (CR) status according to RECIL 2017 criteria showed high concordance with complete metabolic response (CMR) status by Lugano 2014 criteria in both GOYA (92.5%) and GALLIUM (92.4%). EOT and EOI CR/CMR status by both criteria was highly prognostic for PFS in GOYA (RECIL 2017 [CR]: hazard ratio [HR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26–0.46]; Lugano 2014 [CMR]: HR, 0.35 [95% CI 0.26–0.48]; both p < .0001) and GALLIUM (RECIL 2017 [CR]: HR, 0.35 [95% CI 0.23–0.53]; Lugano 2014 [CMR]: HR, 0.21 [95% CI 0.14–0.31]; both p < .0001). In conclusion, response categorization by RECIL 2017 is similar to that by Lugano 2014 criteria, with high concordance observed. Both were prognostic for PFS and OS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10660391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106603912023-10-09 A comparison of the prognostic performance of the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 response criteria in patients with NHL from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials Kostakoglu, Lale Martelli, Maurizio Sehn, Laurie H. Davies, Andrew Trněný, Marek Herold, Michael Vitolo, Umberto Hiddemann, Wolfgang Trotman, Judith Knapp, Andrea Mattiello, Federico Nielsen, Tina G. Sahin, Deniz Sellam, Gila Ward, Carol Younes, Anas EJHaem Haematologic Malignancy ‐ Lymphoid The Lugano 2014 criteria are the standard for response assessment in lymphoma. We compared the prognostic performance of Lugano 2014 and the more recently developed response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017), which relies primarily on computed tomography and uses unidimensional measurements, in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials, respectively. Concordance between responses according to the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 criteria was analyzed. Landmark analyses of progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by end of treatment (EOT) and end of induction (EOI) response status according to RECIL 2017 and Lugano 2014 criteria, and prognostic value of response at EOT/EOI were also compared. Overall, 1333 patients were included from GOYA and 502 from GALLIUM. Complete response (CR) status according to RECIL 2017 criteria showed high concordance with complete metabolic response (CMR) status by Lugano 2014 criteria in both GOYA (92.5%) and GALLIUM (92.4%). EOT and EOI CR/CMR status by both criteria was highly prognostic for PFS in GOYA (RECIL 2017 [CR]: hazard ratio [HR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26–0.46]; Lugano 2014 [CMR]: HR, 0.35 [95% CI 0.26–0.48]; both p < .0001) and GALLIUM (RECIL 2017 [CR]: HR, 0.35 [95% CI 0.23–0.53]; Lugano 2014 [CMR]: HR, 0.21 [95% CI 0.14–0.31]; both p < .0001). In conclusion, response categorization by RECIL 2017 is similar to that by Lugano 2014 criteria, with high concordance observed. Both were prognostic for PFS and OS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10660391/ /pubmed/38024624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.796 Text en © 2023 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Haematologic Malignancy ‐ Lymphoid Kostakoglu, Lale Martelli, Maurizio Sehn, Laurie H. Davies, Andrew Trněný, Marek Herold, Michael Vitolo, Umberto Hiddemann, Wolfgang Trotman, Judith Knapp, Andrea Mattiello, Federico Nielsen, Tina G. Sahin, Deniz Sellam, Gila Ward, Carol Younes, Anas A comparison of the prognostic performance of the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 response criteria in patients with NHL from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials |
title | A comparison of the prognostic performance of the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 response criteria in patients with NHL from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials |
title_full | A comparison of the prognostic performance of the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 response criteria in patients with NHL from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the prognostic performance of the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 response criteria in patients with NHL from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the prognostic performance of the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 response criteria in patients with NHL from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials |
title_short | A comparison of the prognostic performance of the Lugano 2014 and RECIL 2017 response criteria in patients with NHL from the phase III GOYA and GALLIUM trials |
title_sort | comparison of the prognostic performance of the lugano 2014 and recil 2017 response criteria in patients with nhl from the phase iii goya and gallium trials |
topic | Haematologic Malignancy ‐ Lymphoid |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jha2.796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kostakoglulale acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT martellimaurizio acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT sehnlaurieh acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT daviesandrew acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT trnenymarek acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT heroldmichael acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT vitoloumberto acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT hiddemannwolfgang acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT trotmanjudith acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT knappandrea acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT mattiellofederico acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT nielsentinag acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT sahindeniz acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT sellamgila acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT wardcarol acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT younesanas acomparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT kostakoglulale comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT martellimaurizio comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT sehnlaurieh comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT daviesandrew comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT trnenymarek comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT heroldmichael comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT vitoloumberto comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT hiddemannwolfgang comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT trotmanjudith comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT knappandrea comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT mattiellofederico comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT nielsentinag comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT sahindeniz comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT sellamgila comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT wardcarol comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials AT younesanas comparisonoftheprognosticperformanceofthelugano2014andrecil2017responsecriteriainpatientswithnhlfromthephaseiiigoyaandgalliumtrials |