Cargando…

The Association between Non-Invasive Ventilation and the Rate of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) has significant effects on patient outcomes, including prolonging the duration of both mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to assess the association between non-invasive ventilation/oxygenation (NIVO) prior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saunders, Hollie, Khadka, Subekshya, Shrestha, Rabi, Balavenkataraman, Arvind, Hochwald, Alexander, Ball, Colleen, Helgeson, Scott A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37987262
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases11040151
_version_ 1785137817489244160
author Saunders, Hollie
Khadka, Subekshya
Shrestha, Rabi
Balavenkataraman, Arvind
Hochwald, Alexander
Ball, Colleen
Helgeson, Scott A.
author_facet Saunders, Hollie
Khadka, Subekshya
Shrestha, Rabi
Balavenkataraman, Arvind
Hochwald, Alexander
Ball, Colleen
Helgeson, Scott A.
author_sort Saunders, Hollie
collection PubMed
description Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) has significant effects on patient outcomes, including prolonging the duration of both mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to assess the association between non-invasive ventilation/oxygenation (NIVO) prior to intubation and the rate of subsequent VAP. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult patients who were admitted to the medical ICU from three tertiary care academic centers in three distinct regions. NIVO was defined as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for any duration during the hospitalization prior to intubation. The primary outcome variable was VAP association with NIVO. A total of 17,302 patients were included. VAP developed in 2.6% of the patients (444/17,302), 2.3% (285/12,518) of patients among those who did not have NIVO, 1.6% (30/1879) of patients who had CPAP, 2.5% (17/690) of patients who had HFNC, 8.1% (16/197) of patients who had BiPAP, and 4.8% (96/2018) of patients who had a combination of NIVO types. Compared to those who did not have NIVO, VAP was more likely to develop among those who had BiPAP (adj OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.80–5.37, p < 0.001) or a combination of NIVO types (adj OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.49–2.44, p < 0.001) after adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities. The use of BiPAP or a combination of NIVO types significantly increases the odds of developing VAP once receiving IMV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10660719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106607192023-10-27 The Association between Non-Invasive Ventilation and the Rate of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Saunders, Hollie Khadka, Subekshya Shrestha, Rabi Balavenkataraman, Arvind Hochwald, Alexander Ball, Colleen Helgeson, Scott A. Diseases Article Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) has significant effects on patient outcomes, including prolonging the duration of both mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to assess the association between non-invasive ventilation/oxygenation (NIVO) prior to intubation and the rate of subsequent VAP. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult patients who were admitted to the medical ICU from three tertiary care academic centers in three distinct regions. NIVO was defined as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for any duration during the hospitalization prior to intubation. The primary outcome variable was VAP association with NIVO. A total of 17,302 patients were included. VAP developed in 2.6% of the patients (444/17,302), 2.3% (285/12,518) of patients among those who did not have NIVO, 1.6% (30/1879) of patients who had CPAP, 2.5% (17/690) of patients who had HFNC, 8.1% (16/197) of patients who had BiPAP, and 4.8% (96/2018) of patients who had a combination of NIVO types. Compared to those who did not have NIVO, VAP was more likely to develop among those who had BiPAP (adj OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.80–5.37, p < 0.001) or a combination of NIVO types (adj OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.49–2.44, p < 0.001) after adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities. The use of BiPAP or a combination of NIVO types significantly increases the odds of developing VAP once receiving IMV. MDPI 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10660719/ /pubmed/37987262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases11040151 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Saunders, Hollie
Khadka, Subekshya
Shrestha, Rabi
Balavenkataraman, Arvind
Hochwald, Alexander
Ball, Colleen
Helgeson, Scott A.
The Association between Non-Invasive Ventilation and the Rate of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title The Association between Non-Invasive Ventilation and the Rate of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title_full The Association between Non-Invasive Ventilation and the Rate of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title_fullStr The Association between Non-Invasive Ventilation and the Rate of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed The Association between Non-Invasive Ventilation and the Rate of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title_short The Association between Non-Invasive Ventilation and the Rate of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
title_sort association between non-invasive ventilation and the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37987262
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases11040151
work_keys_str_mv AT saundershollie theassociationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT khadkasubekshya theassociationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT shrestharabi theassociationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT balavenkataramanarvind theassociationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT hochwaldalexander theassociationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT ballcolleen theassociationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT helgesonscotta theassociationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT saundershollie associationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT khadkasubekshya associationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT shrestharabi associationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT balavenkataramanarvind associationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT hochwaldalexander associationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT ballcolleen associationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia
AT helgesonscotta associationbetweennoninvasiveventilationandtherateofventilatorassociatedpneumonia