Cargando…
Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care
PURPOSE: The diagnostic delay of primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Therefore, a screening algorithm was previously developed for the early detection of patients at risk of PAD in primary care. We aimed to clinically validate...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10875-023-01575-8 |
_version_ | 1785137872510124032 |
---|---|
author | Messelink, Marianne A. Welsing, Paco M. J. Devercelli, Giovanna Marsden, Jan Willem N. Leavis, Helen L. |
author_facet | Messelink, Marianne A. Welsing, Paco M. J. Devercelli, Giovanna Marsden, Jan Willem N. Leavis, Helen L. |
author_sort | Messelink, Marianne A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The diagnostic delay of primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Therefore, a screening algorithm was previously developed for the early detection of patients at risk of PAD in primary care. We aimed to clinically validate and optimize the PAD screening algorithm by applying it to a primary care database in the Netherlands. METHODS: The algorithm was applied to a data set of 61,172 electronic health records (EHRs). Four hundred high-scoring EHRs were screened for exclusion criteria, and remaining patients were invited for serum immunoglobulin analysis and referred if clinically necessary. RESULTS: Of the 104 patients eligible for inclusion, 16 were referred by their general practitioner for suspected PAD, of whom 10 had a PAD diagnosis. In patients selected by the screening algorithm and included for laboratory analysis, prevalence of PAD was ~ 1:10 versus 1:1700–1:25,000 in the general population. To optimize efficiency of the screening process, we refitted the algorithm with the subset of high-risk patients, which improved the area under the curve–receiver operating characteristics curve value to 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.63–0.97). We propose a two-step screening process, first applying the original algorithm to distinguish high-risk from low-risk patients, then applying the optimized algorithm to select high-risk patients for serum immunoglobulin analysis. CONCLUSION: Using the screening algorithm, we were able to identify 10 new PAD patients from a primary care population, thus reducing diagnostic delay. Future studies should address further validation in other populations and full cost-effectiveness analyses. REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov record number NCT05310604, first submitted 25 March 2022 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10660978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106609782023-09-16 Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care Messelink, Marianne A. Welsing, Paco M. J. Devercelli, Giovanna Marsden, Jan Willem N. Leavis, Helen L. J Clin Immunol Original Article PURPOSE: The diagnostic delay of primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Therefore, a screening algorithm was previously developed for the early detection of patients at risk of PAD in primary care. We aimed to clinically validate and optimize the PAD screening algorithm by applying it to a primary care database in the Netherlands. METHODS: The algorithm was applied to a data set of 61,172 electronic health records (EHRs). Four hundred high-scoring EHRs were screened for exclusion criteria, and remaining patients were invited for serum immunoglobulin analysis and referred if clinically necessary. RESULTS: Of the 104 patients eligible for inclusion, 16 were referred by their general practitioner for suspected PAD, of whom 10 had a PAD diagnosis. In patients selected by the screening algorithm and included for laboratory analysis, prevalence of PAD was ~ 1:10 versus 1:1700–1:25,000 in the general population. To optimize efficiency of the screening process, we refitted the algorithm with the subset of high-risk patients, which improved the area under the curve–receiver operating characteristics curve value to 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.63–0.97). We propose a two-step screening process, first applying the original algorithm to distinguish high-risk from low-risk patients, then applying the optimized algorithm to select high-risk patients for serum immunoglobulin analysis. CONCLUSION: Using the screening algorithm, we were able to identify 10 new PAD patients from a primary care population, thus reducing diagnostic delay. Future studies should address further validation in other populations and full cost-effectiveness analyses. REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov record number NCT05310604, first submitted 25 March 2022 Springer US 2023-09-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10660978/ /pubmed/37715890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10875-023-01575-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Messelink, Marianne A. Welsing, Paco M. J. Devercelli, Giovanna Marsden, Jan Willem N. Leavis, Helen L. Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care |
title | Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care |
title_full | Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care |
title_fullStr | Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care |
title_short | Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care |
title_sort | clinical validation of a primary antibody deficiency screening algorithm for primary care |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10660978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37715890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10875-023-01575-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT messelinkmariannea clinicalvalidationofaprimaryantibodydeficiencyscreeningalgorithmforprimarycare AT welsingpacomj clinicalvalidationofaprimaryantibodydeficiencyscreeningalgorithmforprimarycare AT devercelligiovanna clinicalvalidationofaprimaryantibodydeficiencyscreeningalgorithmforprimarycare AT marsdenjanwillemn clinicalvalidationofaprimaryantibodydeficiencyscreeningalgorithmforprimarycare AT leavishelenl clinicalvalidationofaprimaryantibodydeficiencyscreeningalgorithmforprimarycare |