Cargando…

The impact of the Apfel scoring system for prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common, undesirable, and stressful following surgery. By focusing attention and resources on those groups of patients most likely to develop PONV, the quality of care provided to the patients can be improved. The primary objective was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avinash, Shastri H, Krishna, Handattu Mahabaleswara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38025550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_553_21
_version_ 1785138021946884096
author Avinash, Shastri H
Krishna, Handattu Mahabaleswara
author_facet Avinash, Shastri H
Krishna, Handattu Mahabaleswara
author_sort Avinash, Shastri H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common, undesirable, and stressful following surgery. By focusing attention and resources on those groups of patients most likely to develop PONV, the quality of care provided to the patients can be improved. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of PONV after implementation of the Apfel scoring system with the control group receiving prophylaxis for every surgery. The secondary objective was to identify the effect on the patient’s expenditure/savings with respect to management of PONV. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled double-blinded study enrolled 70 patients undergoing surgeries under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized to group A (control group – all received PONV prophylaxis) and group B (Apfel stratification performed for PONV prophylaxis). Based on the Apfel system, the risk of PONV was classified as the grades low, moderate, and high risk. Patients at moderate and high risk received PONV prophylaxis in group B. Patients were monitored for PONV during 24 h after surgery and rescue medication given as required. The effect of implementing Apfel risk stratification on the incidence of PONV (primary outcome measure) and on patient expenditure was compared. RESULTS: Compared to administering prophylaxis for all patients, the incidence of PONV [group A-5 patients (14.3%)] did not increase (P = 0.428) after implementing the Apfel scoring system [group B-2 patients (5.7%)]. The number of patients spending on prophylaxis for PONV in group A [35 (100%)] was higher than that in group B [17 (48%)], without increasing expenditure on PONV treatment. CONCLUSION: Withholding prophylaxis on the basis of the Apfel scoring system did not increase the incidence of PONV compared to providing prophylaxis for all the patients. The overall cost of prevention and treatment of PONV is less when the Apfel scoring system is used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10661641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106616412023-07-01 The impact of the Apfel scoring system for prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting: A randomized controlled trial Avinash, Shastri H Krishna, Handattu Mahabaleswara J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common, undesirable, and stressful following surgery. By focusing attention and resources on those groups of patients most likely to develop PONV, the quality of care provided to the patients can be improved. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of PONV after implementation of the Apfel scoring system with the control group receiving prophylaxis for every surgery. The secondary objective was to identify the effect on the patient’s expenditure/savings with respect to management of PONV. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled double-blinded study enrolled 70 patients undergoing surgeries under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized to group A (control group – all received PONV prophylaxis) and group B (Apfel stratification performed for PONV prophylaxis). Based on the Apfel system, the risk of PONV was classified as the grades low, moderate, and high risk. Patients at moderate and high risk received PONV prophylaxis in group B. Patients were monitored for PONV during 24 h after surgery and rescue medication given as required. The effect of implementing Apfel risk stratification on the incidence of PONV (primary outcome measure) and on patient expenditure was compared. RESULTS: Compared to administering prophylaxis for all patients, the incidence of PONV [group A-5 patients (14.3%)] did not increase (P = 0.428) after implementing the Apfel scoring system [group B-2 patients (5.7%)]. The number of patients spending on prophylaxis for PONV in group A [35 (100%)] was higher than that in group B [17 (48%)], without increasing expenditure on PONV treatment. CONCLUSION: Withholding prophylaxis on the basis of the Apfel scoring system did not increase the incidence of PONV compared to providing prophylaxis for all the patients. The overall cost of prevention and treatment of PONV is less when the Apfel scoring system is used. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10661641/ /pubmed/38025550 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_553_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Avinash, Shastri H
Krishna, Handattu Mahabaleswara
The impact of the Apfel scoring system for prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting: A randomized controlled trial
title The impact of the Apfel scoring system for prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting: A randomized controlled trial
title_full The impact of the Apfel scoring system for prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The impact of the Apfel scoring system for prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the Apfel scoring system for prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting: A randomized controlled trial
title_short The impact of the Apfel scoring system for prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort impact of the apfel scoring system for prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38025550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_553_21
work_keys_str_mv AT avinashshastrih theimpactoftheapfelscoringsystemforprophylaxisofpostoperativenauseaandvomitingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krishnahandattumahabaleswara theimpactoftheapfelscoringsystemforprophylaxisofpostoperativenauseaandvomitingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT avinashshastrih impactoftheapfelscoringsystemforprophylaxisofpostoperativenauseaandvomitingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krishnahandattumahabaleswara impactoftheapfelscoringsystemforprophylaxisofpostoperativenauseaandvomitingarandomizedcontrolledtrial