Cargando…
Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-II block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: A randomised control study
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Regional anesthesia techniques have attributed a multimodal dimension to pain management after breast surgery. The intercostal approach to paravertebral block has been gaining interest, becoming an alternative to conventional paravertebral block, devoid of complexities in its ap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38025564 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_411_21 |
_version_ | 1785138023597342720 |
---|---|
author | Ameta, Nihar Ramkiran, Seshadri Vivekanand, Desiraju Honwad, Manish Jaiswal, Alok Gupta, Manoj Kumar |
author_facet | Ameta, Nihar Ramkiran, Seshadri Vivekanand, Desiraju Honwad, Manish Jaiswal, Alok Gupta, Manoj Kumar |
author_sort | Ameta, Nihar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Regional anesthesia techniques have attributed a multimodal dimension to pain management after breast surgery. The intercostal approach to paravertebral block has been gaining interest, becoming an alternative to conventional paravertebral block, devoid of complexities in its approach, being recognized as the proximal intercostal block. Parallel to the widespread acceptance of fascial plane blocks in breast surgery, pectoralis II block has emerged as being non-inferior to paravertebral block. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two independent fascial plane blocks, proximal intercostal block and pectoralis II block, in breast conservation surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized control, pilot study included 40 patients, randomly allocated among two groups: proximal intercostal block and pectoralis II block. RESULTS: The pectoralis II block group had significantly lower pain scores at rest in the immediate postoperative period but became comparable with the proximal intercostal block group in the late postoperative period. Pain scores on movement though were lower at 0 h postoperatively and became comparable with the proximal intercostal block group subsequently. Although the pectoralis II group had earlier recovery in the post-anesthesia care unit, the overall time to discharge from the hospital was comparable and not influential. Both groups had high patient satisfaction scores and similar perioperative opioid consumption. Sedation, time to first rescue analgesia, and postoperative nausea vomiting scores were comparable. CONCLUSION: Fascial plane blocks in the form of pectoralis II and proximal intercostal block facilitate pain alleviation, early return to shoulder arm exercise, and enhanced recovery, which should render them to be incorporated into multimodal interdisciplinary pain management in breast conservation surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10661648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106616482023-07-01 Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-II block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: A randomised control study Ameta, Nihar Ramkiran, Seshadri Vivekanand, Desiraju Honwad, Manish Jaiswal, Alok Gupta, Manoj Kumar J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Regional anesthesia techniques have attributed a multimodal dimension to pain management after breast surgery. The intercostal approach to paravertebral block has been gaining interest, becoming an alternative to conventional paravertebral block, devoid of complexities in its approach, being recognized as the proximal intercostal block. Parallel to the widespread acceptance of fascial plane blocks in breast surgery, pectoralis II block has emerged as being non-inferior to paravertebral block. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two independent fascial plane blocks, proximal intercostal block and pectoralis II block, in breast conservation surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized control, pilot study included 40 patients, randomly allocated among two groups: proximal intercostal block and pectoralis II block. RESULTS: The pectoralis II block group had significantly lower pain scores at rest in the immediate postoperative period but became comparable with the proximal intercostal block group in the late postoperative period. Pain scores on movement though were lower at 0 h postoperatively and became comparable with the proximal intercostal block group subsequently. Although the pectoralis II group had earlier recovery in the post-anesthesia care unit, the overall time to discharge from the hospital was comparable and not influential. Both groups had high patient satisfaction scores and similar perioperative opioid consumption. Sedation, time to first rescue analgesia, and postoperative nausea vomiting scores were comparable. CONCLUSION: Fascial plane blocks in the form of pectoralis II and proximal intercostal block facilitate pain alleviation, early return to shoulder arm exercise, and enhanced recovery, which should render them to be incorporated into multimodal interdisciplinary pain management in breast conservation surgery. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10661648/ /pubmed/38025564 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_411_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ameta, Nihar Ramkiran, Seshadri Vivekanand, Desiraju Honwad, Manish Jaiswal, Alok Gupta, Manoj Kumar Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-II block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: A randomised control study |
title | Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-II block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: A randomised control study |
title_full | Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-II block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: A randomised control study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-II block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: A randomised control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-II block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: A randomised control study |
title_short | Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-II block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: A randomised control study |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-ii block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: a randomised control study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38025564 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_411_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ametanihar comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralisiiblockandintercostalapproachtoparavertebralblockproximalintercostalblockamongpatientsundergoingconservativebreastsurgeryarandomisedcontrolstudy AT ramkiranseshadri comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralisiiblockandintercostalapproachtoparavertebralblockproximalintercostalblockamongpatientsundergoingconservativebreastsurgeryarandomisedcontrolstudy AT vivekananddesiraju comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralisiiblockandintercostalapproachtoparavertebralblockproximalintercostalblockamongpatientsundergoingconservativebreastsurgeryarandomisedcontrolstudy AT honwadmanish comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralisiiblockandintercostalapproachtoparavertebralblockproximalintercostalblockamongpatientsundergoingconservativebreastsurgeryarandomisedcontrolstudy AT jaiswalalok comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralisiiblockandintercostalapproachtoparavertebralblockproximalintercostalblockamongpatientsundergoingconservativebreastsurgeryarandomisedcontrolstudy AT guptamanojkumar comparisonoftheefficacyofultrasoundguidedpectoralisiiblockandintercostalapproachtoparavertebralblockproximalintercostalblockamongpatientsundergoingconservativebreastsurgeryarandomisedcontrolstudy |