Cargando…

Impact of the 2019 Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection on Treatment Response Rates: A Reanalysis of a Clinical Trial of Nitrofurantoin vs Fosfomycin

BACKGROUND: Current US Food and Administration (FDA) guidance recommends that the primary efficacy endpoint for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) clinical trials be a composite of clinical and microbiological responses. We applied these criteria to a previous clinical trial to determine t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grant, Rebecca, Büchler, Andrea, Flight, William, Huang, Chun, Ferrinho, Diogo, Janmohamed, Salim, Mulgirigama, Aruni, Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek, Leibovici, Leonard, Huttner, Angela, Harbarth, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad557
_version_ 1785138025439690752
author Grant, Rebecca
Büchler, Andrea
Flight, William
Huang, Chun
Ferrinho, Diogo
Janmohamed, Salim
Mulgirigama, Aruni
Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
Leibovici, Leonard
Huttner, Angela
Harbarth, Stephan
author_facet Grant, Rebecca
Büchler, Andrea
Flight, William
Huang, Chun
Ferrinho, Diogo
Janmohamed, Salim
Mulgirigama, Aruni
Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
Leibovici, Leonard
Huttner, Angela
Harbarth, Stephan
author_sort Grant, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current US Food and Administration (FDA) guidance recommends that the primary efficacy endpoint for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) clinical trials be a composite of clinical and microbiological responses. We applied these criteria to a previous clinical trial to determine the impact on treatment outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a patient-level reanalysis of a randomized clinical trial of nitrofurantoin versus fosfomycin for treatment of uUTI in nonpregnant adult women. Women were included in the reanalysis if they had 2 or more signs/symptoms of uUTI and a single bacterial species isolated from baseline urine culture at ≥10(5 )colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. The applied primary efficacy endpoint—therapeutic response—required both clinical resolution of signs/symptoms and reduction of the infecting bacterial pathogen to <10(3 )CFU/mL at day 14 post–treatment completion. RESULTS: Two hundred eleven of 513 (41%) patients were eligible for inclusion in the reanalysis. Among these patients, 74% (76/103) and 69% (75/108) in the nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin groups, respectively, achieved clinical resolution by day 14. Similarly, 70% (72/103) and 67% (72/108) in each group achieved microbiological success at day 14. As such, 59% (61/103) and 57% (62/108) of women in each group met the primary efficacy endpoint—therapeutic success—at day 14. In comparison, 75% and 66% of patients in each group achieved clinical resolution at day 14 in the initial clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS: Applying current FDA guidance resulted in lower composite efficacy rates than clinical resolution alone as observed in the initial clinical trial. This may limit the ability to compare antibiotic treatment effects between historical and future clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10661658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106616582023-11-04 Impact of the 2019 Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection on Treatment Response Rates: A Reanalysis of a Clinical Trial of Nitrofurantoin vs Fosfomycin Grant, Rebecca Büchler, Andrea Flight, William Huang, Chun Ferrinho, Diogo Janmohamed, Salim Mulgirigama, Aruni Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek Leibovici, Leonard Huttner, Angela Harbarth, Stephan Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Current US Food and Administration (FDA) guidance recommends that the primary efficacy endpoint for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) clinical trials be a composite of clinical and microbiological responses. We applied these criteria to a previous clinical trial to determine the impact on treatment outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a patient-level reanalysis of a randomized clinical trial of nitrofurantoin versus fosfomycin for treatment of uUTI in nonpregnant adult women. Women were included in the reanalysis if they had 2 or more signs/symptoms of uUTI and a single bacterial species isolated from baseline urine culture at ≥10(5 )colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. The applied primary efficacy endpoint—therapeutic response—required both clinical resolution of signs/symptoms and reduction of the infecting bacterial pathogen to <10(3 )CFU/mL at day 14 post–treatment completion. RESULTS: Two hundred eleven of 513 (41%) patients were eligible for inclusion in the reanalysis. Among these patients, 74% (76/103) and 69% (75/108) in the nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin groups, respectively, achieved clinical resolution by day 14. Similarly, 70% (72/103) and 67% (72/108) in each group achieved microbiological success at day 14. As such, 59% (61/103) and 57% (62/108) of women in each group met the primary efficacy endpoint—therapeutic success—at day 14. In comparison, 75% and 66% of patients in each group achieved clinical resolution at day 14 in the initial clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS: Applying current FDA guidance resulted in lower composite efficacy rates than clinical resolution alone as observed in the initial clinical trial. This may limit the ability to compare antibiotic treatment effects between historical and future clinical trials. Oxford University Press 2023-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10661658/ /pubmed/38023546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad557 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Major Article
Grant, Rebecca
Büchler, Andrea
Flight, William
Huang, Chun
Ferrinho, Diogo
Janmohamed, Salim
Mulgirigama, Aruni
Godycki-Cwirko, Maciek
Leibovici, Leonard
Huttner, Angela
Harbarth, Stephan
Impact of the 2019 Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection on Treatment Response Rates: A Reanalysis of a Clinical Trial of Nitrofurantoin vs Fosfomycin
title Impact of the 2019 Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection on Treatment Response Rates: A Reanalysis of a Clinical Trial of Nitrofurantoin vs Fosfomycin
title_full Impact of the 2019 Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection on Treatment Response Rates: A Reanalysis of a Clinical Trial of Nitrofurantoin vs Fosfomycin
title_fullStr Impact of the 2019 Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection on Treatment Response Rates: A Reanalysis of a Clinical Trial of Nitrofurantoin vs Fosfomycin
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the 2019 Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection on Treatment Response Rates: A Reanalysis of a Clinical Trial of Nitrofurantoin vs Fosfomycin
title_short Impact of the 2019 Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection on Treatment Response Rates: A Reanalysis of a Clinical Trial of Nitrofurantoin vs Fosfomycin
title_sort impact of the 2019 food and drug administration guidance for uncomplicated urinary tract infection on treatment response rates: a reanalysis of a clinical trial of nitrofurantoin vs fosfomycin
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad557
work_keys_str_mv AT grantrebecca impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin
AT buchlerandrea impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin
AT flightwilliam impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin
AT huangchun impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin
AT ferrinhodiogo impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin
AT janmohamedsalim impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin
AT mulgirigamaaruni impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin
AT godyckicwirkomaciek impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin
AT leibovicileonard impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin
AT huttnerangela impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin
AT harbarthstephan impactofthe2019foodanddrugadministrationguidanceforuncomplicatedurinarytractinfectionontreatmentresponseratesareanalysisofaclinicaltrialofnitrofurantoinvsfosfomycin