Cargando…
Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to prospectively compare quantitative and subjective image quality, scanning time, and diagnostic confidence between a new deep learning-based reconstruction(DLR) algorithm and standard MRI protocol of lumbar spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty healthy volu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37369725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04390-9 |
_version_ | 1785138057963372544 |
---|---|
author | Zerunian, Marta Pucciarelli, Francesco Caruso, Damiano De Santis, Domenico Polici, Michela Masci, Benedetta Nacci, Ilaria Del Gaudio, Antonella Argento, Giuseppe Redler, Andrea Laghi, Andrea |
author_facet | Zerunian, Marta Pucciarelli, Francesco Caruso, Damiano De Santis, Domenico Polici, Michela Masci, Benedetta Nacci, Ilaria Del Gaudio, Antonella Argento, Giuseppe Redler, Andrea Laghi, Andrea |
author_sort | Zerunian, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to prospectively compare quantitative and subjective image quality, scanning time, and diagnostic confidence between a new deep learning-based reconstruction(DLR) algorithm and standard MRI protocol of lumbar spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty healthy volunteers underwent 1.5T MRI examination of lumbar spine from September 2021 to May 2023. Protocol acquisition comprised sagittal T1- and T2-weighted fast spin echo and short-tau inversion recovery images and axial multislices T2-weighted fast spin echo images. All sequences were acquired with both DLR algorithm and standard protocols. Two radiologists, blinded to the reconstruction technique, performed quantitative and qualitative image quality analysis in consensus reading; diagnostic confidence was also assessed. Quantitative image quality analysis was assessed by calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative image quality analysis and diagnostic confidence were assessed with a five-point Likert scale. Scanning times were also compared. RESULTS: DLR SNR was higher in all sequences (all p<0.001). CNR of the DLR was superior to conventional dataset only for axial and sagittal T2-weighted fast spin echo images (p<0.001). Qualitative analysis showed DLR had higher overall quality in all sequences (all p<0.001), with an inter-rater agreement of 0.83 (0.78–0.86). DLR total protocol scanning time was lower compared to standard protocol (6:26 vs 12:59 min, p<0.001). Diagnostic confidence for DLR algorithm was not inferior to standard protocol. CONCLUSION: DLR applied to 1.5T MRI is a feasible method for lumbar spine imaging providing morphologic sequences with higher image quality and similar diagnostic confidence compared with standard protocol, enabling a remarkable time saving (up to 50%). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10661795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106617952023-06-28 Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol Zerunian, Marta Pucciarelli, Francesco Caruso, Damiano De Santis, Domenico Polici, Michela Masci, Benedetta Nacci, Ilaria Del Gaudio, Antonella Argento, Giuseppe Redler, Andrea Laghi, Andrea Skeletal Radiol Scientific Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to prospectively compare quantitative and subjective image quality, scanning time, and diagnostic confidence between a new deep learning-based reconstruction(DLR) algorithm and standard MRI protocol of lumbar spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty healthy volunteers underwent 1.5T MRI examination of lumbar spine from September 2021 to May 2023. Protocol acquisition comprised sagittal T1- and T2-weighted fast spin echo and short-tau inversion recovery images and axial multislices T2-weighted fast spin echo images. All sequences were acquired with both DLR algorithm and standard protocols. Two radiologists, blinded to the reconstruction technique, performed quantitative and qualitative image quality analysis in consensus reading; diagnostic confidence was also assessed. Quantitative image quality analysis was assessed by calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative image quality analysis and diagnostic confidence were assessed with a five-point Likert scale. Scanning times were also compared. RESULTS: DLR SNR was higher in all sequences (all p<0.001). CNR of the DLR was superior to conventional dataset only for axial and sagittal T2-weighted fast spin echo images (p<0.001). Qualitative analysis showed DLR had higher overall quality in all sequences (all p<0.001), with an inter-rater agreement of 0.83 (0.78–0.86). DLR total protocol scanning time was lower compared to standard protocol (6:26 vs 12:59 min, p<0.001). Diagnostic confidence for DLR algorithm was not inferior to standard protocol. CONCLUSION: DLR applied to 1.5T MRI is a feasible method for lumbar spine imaging providing morphologic sequences with higher image quality and similar diagnostic confidence compared with standard protocol, enabling a remarkable time saving (up to 50%). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-28 2024 /pmc/articles/PMC10661795/ /pubmed/37369725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04390-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Zerunian, Marta Pucciarelli, Francesco Caruso, Damiano De Santis, Domenico Polici, Michela Masci, Benedetta Nacci, Ilaria Del Gaudio, Antonella Argento, Giuseppe Redler, Andrea Laghi, Andrea Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol |
title | Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol |
title_full | Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol |
title_fullStr | Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol |
title_short | Fast high-quality MRI protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol |
title_sort | fast high-quality mri protocol of the lumbar spine with deep learning-based algorithm: an image quality and scanning time comparison with standard protocol |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37369725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04390-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zerunianmarta fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol AT pucciarellifrancesco fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol AT carusodamiano fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol AT desantisdomenico fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol AT policimichela fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol AT mascibenedetta fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol AT nacciilaria fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol AT delgaudioantonella fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol AT argentogiuseppe fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol AT redlerandrea fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol AT laghiandrea fasthighqualitymriprotocolofthelumbarspinewithdeeplearningbasedalgorithmanimagequalityandscanningtimecomparisonwithstandardprotocol |