Cargando…

“The accuracy of the EOS imaging system to assess hip abnormalities in adolescents and adults:” a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of the EOS imaging system compared to the gold standard computed tomography (CT) scan, for the measurement of native and postoperative/prosthetic hip parameters in adolescents and adults. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Systematic Review, and Web of Science databases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alghamdi, Ahmed, Madan, Sanjeev, Shuweihdi, Farag, Offiah, Amaka C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37338589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04351-2
_version_ 1785138061142654976
author Alghamdi, Ahmed
Madan, Sanjeev
Shuweihdi, Farag
Offiah, Amaka C.
author_facet Alghamdi, Ahmed
Madan, Sanjeev
Shuweihdi, Farag
Offiah, Amaka C.
author_sort Alghamdi, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of the EOS imaging system compared to the gold standard computed tomography (CT) scan, for the measurement of native and postoperative/prosthetic hip parameters in adolescents and adults. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Systematic Review, and Web of Science databases were searched to obtain relevant articles published between January 1964 and February 2021. All articles published in English. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed according to the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) framework. Three reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. A narrative synthesis of the articles and a meta-analysis were conducted. The heterogeneity exhibited by the effect sizes was obtained using a forest plot, the Q statistic and the I2 index. Reliability coefficients were transformed into Fisher’s Z to normalise their distribution and stabilise the variances. For each meta-analysis, an effect size (average reliability coefficient) and a 95% confidence interval were calculated and presented in a forest plot. The amount of radiation dose between modalities was compared. RESULTS: The search retrieved 75 articles, six of which met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The meta-analysis included five of these six studies (sample size from 20 to 90). Comparing EOS and CT, the estimated average correlation (effect size) for combined studies was significantly high (r = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.88, p-value < 0.001). With respect to Pearson’s correlation between EOS and CT, the estimated average correlation for combined studies was significantly high (r = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.90, p-value < 0.001). Average radiation dose for EOS was 0.18 ± 0.05 mGy for the anteroposterior view (AP) and 0.45 ± 0.08 mGy for the lateral view; and for CT was 8.4 to 15.6 mGy. CONCLUSION: The EOS imaging system has a high correlation with CT for preoperative and postoperative/prosthetic hip measurements, with considerably lower irradiation of patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00256-023-04351-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10661804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106618042023-06-20 “The accuracy of the EOS imaging system to assess hip abnormalities in adolescents and adults:” a systematic review and meta-analysis Alghamdi, Ahmed Madan, Sanjeev Shuweihdi, Farag Offiah, Amaka C. Skeletal Radiol Review Article OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of the EOS imaging system compared to the gold standard computed tomography (CT) scan, for the measurement of native and postoperative/prosthetic hip parameters in adolescents and adults. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Systematic Review, and Web of Science databases were searched to obtain relevant articles published between January 1964 and February 2021. All articles published in English. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed according to the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) framework. Three reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. A narrative synthesis of the articles and a meta-analysis were conducted. The heterogeneity exhibited by the effect sizes was obtained using a forest plot, the Q statistic and the I2 index. Reliability coefficients were transformed into Fisher’s Z to normalise their distribution and stabilise the variances. For each meta-analysis, an effect size (average reliability coefficient) and a 95% confidence interval were calculated and presented in a forest plot. The amount of radiation dose between modalities was compared. RESULTS: The search retrieved 75 articles, six of which met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The meta-analysis included five of these six studies (sample size from 20 to 90). Comparing EOS and CT, the estimated average correlation (effect size) for combined studies was significantly high (r = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.88, p-value < 0.001). With respect to Pearson’s correlation between EOS and CT, the estimated average correlation for combined studies was significantly high (r = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.90, p-value < 0.001). Average radiation dose for EOS was 0.18 ± 0.05 mGy for the anteroposterior view (AP) and 0.45 ± 0.08 mGy for the lateral view; and for CT was 8.4 to 15.6 mGy. CONCLUSION: The EOS imaging system has a high correlation with CT for preoperative and postoperative/prosthetic hip measurements, with considerably lower irradiation of patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00256-023-04351-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-20 2024 /pmc/articles/PMC10661804/ /pubmed/37338589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04351-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Alghamdi, Ahmed
Madan, Sanjeev
Shuweihdi, Farag
Offiah, Amaka C.
“The accuracy of the EOS imaging system to assess hip abnormalities in adolescents and adults:” a systematic review and meta-analysis
title “The accuracy of the EOS imaging system to assess hip abnormalities in adolescents and adults:” a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full “The accuracy of the EOS imaging system to assess hip abnormalities in adolescents and adults:” a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr “The accuracy of the EOS imaging system to assess hip abnormalities in adolescents and adults:” a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed “The accuracy of the EOS imaging system to assess hip abnormalities in adolescents and adults:” a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short “The accuracy of the EOS imaging system to assess hip abnormalities in adolescents and adults:” a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort “the accuracy of the eos imaging system to assess hip abnormalities in adolescents and adults:” a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37338589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04351-2
work_keys_str_mv AT alghamdiahmed theaccuracyoftheeosimagingsystemtoassesshipabnormalitiesinadolescentsandadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT madansanjeev theaccuracyoftheeosimagingsystemtoassesshipabnormalitiesinadolescentsandadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shuweihdifarag theaccuracyoftheeosimagingsystemtoassesshipabnormalitiesinadolescentsandadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT offiahamakac theaccuracyoftheeosimagingsystemtoassesshipabnormalitiesinadolescentsandadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis