Cargando…

Obesity Pillars Roundtable: Body mass index and body composition in Black and Female individuals. Race-relevant or racist? Sex-relevant or sexist?

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI or weight in kilograms/height in meters(2)) is the most common metric to diagnose overweight and obesity. However, a body composition analysis more thoroughly assesses adiposity, percent body fat, lean body mass (i.e., including skeletal muscle), and sometimes bone m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bays, Harold Edward, Gonsahn-Bollie, Sylvia, Younglove, Courtney, Wharton, Sean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100044
_version_ 1785148504445812736
author Bays, Harold Edward
Gonsahn-Bollie, Sylvia
Younglove, Courtney
Wharton, Sean
author_facet Bays, Harold Edward
Gonsahn-Bollie, Sylvia
Younglove, Courtney
Wharton, Sean
author_sort Bays, Harold Edward
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI or weight in kilograms/height in meters(2)) is the most common metric to diagnose overweight and obesity. However, a body composition analysis more thoroughly assesses adiposity, percent body fat, lean body mass (i.e., including skeletal muscle), and sometimes bone mineral density. BMI is not an accurate assessment of body fat in individuals with increased or decreased muscle mass; the diagnostic utility of BMI in individuals is also influenced by race and sex. METHODS: Previous Obesity Pillars Roundtables addressed the diagnostic limitations of BMI, the importance of android and visceral fat (especially among those with South and East Asian ancestry), and considerations of obesity among individuals who identify as Hispanic, diverse in sexual-orientation, Black, Native American, and having ancestry from the Mediterranean and Middle East regions. This roundtable examines considerations of BMI in Black and female individuals. RESULTS: The panelists agreed that body composition assessment was a more accurate measure of adiposity and muscle mass than BMI. When it came to matters of race and sex, one panelist felt: “race is a social construct and not a defining biology.” Another felt that: “BMI should be a screening tool to prompt further evaluation of adiposity that utilizes better diagnostic tools for body composition.” Regarding bias and misperceptions of resistance training in female individuals, another panelist stated: “I have spent my entire medical career taking care of women and have never seen a woman unintentionally gain ‘too much’ muscle mass and bulk up from moderate strength training.” CONCLUSIONS: Conveying the importance of race and sex regarding body composition has proven challenging, with the discussion sometimes devolving into misunderstandings or misinformation that may be perceived as racist or sexist. Body composition analysis is the ultimate diagnostic equalizer in addressing the inaccuracies and biases inherent in the exclusive use of BMI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10662008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106620082023-11-21 Obesity Pillars Roundtable: Body mass index and body composition in Black and Female individuals. Race-relevant or racist? Sex-relevant or sexist? Bays, Harold Edward Gonsahn-Bollie, Sylvia Younglove, Courtney Wharton, Sean Obes Pillars Review BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI or weight in kilograms/height in meters(2)) is the most common metric to diagnose overweight and obesity. However, a body composition analysis more thoroughly assesses adiposity, percent body fat, lean body mass (i.e., including skeletal muscle), and sometimes bone mineral density. BMI is not an accurate assessment of body fat in individuals with increased or decreased muscle mass; the diagnostic utility of BMI in individuals is also influenced by race and sex. METHODS: Previous Obesity Pillars Roundtables addressed the diagnostic limitations of BMI, the importance of android and visceral fat (especially among those with South and East Asian ancestry), and considerations of obesity among individuals who identify as Hispanic, diverse in sexual-orientation, Black, Native American, and having ancestry from the Mediterranean and Middle East regions. This roundtable examines considerations of BMI in Black and female individuals. RESULTS: The panelists agreed that body composition assessment was a more accurate measure of adiposity and muscle mass than BMI. When it came to matters of race and sex, one panelist felt: “race is a social construct and not a defining biology.” Another felt that: “BMI should be a screening tool to prompt further evaluation of adiposity that utilizes better diagnostic tools for body composition.” Regarding bias and misperceptions of resistance training in female individuals, another panelist stated: “I have spent my entire medical career taking care of women and have never seen a woman unintentionally gain ‘too much’ muscle mass and bulk up from moderate strength training.” CONCLUSIONS: Conveying the importance of race and sex regarding body composition has proven challenging, with the discussion sometimes devolving into misunderstandings or misinformation that may be perceived as racist or sexist. Body composition analysis is the ultimate diagnostic equalizer in addressing the inaccuracies and biases inherent in the exclusive use of BMI. Elsevier 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10662008/ /pubmed/37990673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100044 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bays, Harold Edward
Gonsahn-Bollie, Sylvia
Younglove, Courtney
Wharton, Sean
Obesity Pillars Roundtable: Body mass index and body composition in Black and Female individuals. Race-relevant or racist? Sex-relevant or sexist?
title Obesity Pillars Roundtable: Body mass index and body composition in Black and Female individuals. Race-relevant or racist? Sex-relevant or sexist?
title_full Obesity Pillars Roundtable: Body mass index and body composition in Black and Female individuals. Race-relevant or racist? Sex-relevant or sexist?
title_fullStr Obesity Pillars Roundtable: Body mass index and body composition in Black and Female individuals. Race-relevant or racist? Sex-relevant or sexist?
title_full_unstemmed Obesity Pillars Roundtable: Body mass index and body composition in Black and Female individuals. Race-relevant or racist? Sex-relevant or sexist?
title_short Obesity Pillars Roundtable: Body mass index and body composition in Black and Female individuals. Race-relevant or racist? Sex-relevant or sexist?
title_sort obesity pillars roundtable: body mass index and body composition in black and female individuals. race-relevant or racist? sex-relevant or sexist?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100044
work_keys_str_mv AT baysharoldedward obesitypillarsroundtablebodymassindexandbodycompositioninblackandfemaleindividualsracerelevantorracistsexrelevantorsexist
AT gonsahnbolliesylvia obesitypillarsroundtablebodymassindexandbodycompositioninblackandfemaleindividualsracerelevantorracistsexrelevantorsexist
AT younglovecourtney obesitypillarsroundtablebodymassindexandbodycompositioninblackandfemaleindividualsracerelevantorracistsexrelevantorsexist
AT whartonsean obesitypillarsroundtablebodymassindexandbodycompositioninblackandfemaleindividualsracerelevantorracistsexrelevantorsexist