Cargando…

Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Whether a transthoracic (TT) procedure by a thoracic surgeon or a transabdominal (TA) by a gastrointestinal surgeon is best for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA) remains unknown. Survival and perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups in this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Hongyang, Yin, Xingmei, Pan, Tiewen, Tao, Xiandong, Xu, Xiaolin, Li, Zhenjia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11640-5
_version_ 1785148556747735040
author Zheng, Hongyang
Yin, Xingmei
Pan, Tiewen
Tao, Xiandong
Xu, Xiaolin
Li, Zhenjia
author_facet Zheng, Hongyang
Yin, Xingmei
Pan, Tiewen
Tao, Xiandong
Xu, Xiaolin
Li, Zhenjia
author_sort Zheng, Hongyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether a transthoracic (TT) procedure by a thoracic surgeon or a transabdominal (TA) by a gastrointestinal surgeon is best for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA) remains unknown. Survival and perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups in this meta-analysis to clarify this argument. METHODS: We searched 7 databases for eligible studies comparing TT and TA procedures for Siewert type II EGJA. The final analyzed endpoints included intraoperative and hospitalization outcomes, recurrence, complication, and survival. RESULTS: Seventeen studies involving 10,756 patients met the inclusion criteria. The TA group had higher rates of overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.31 [1.20 ~ 1.44], p < 0.00001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 1.49 [1.24 ~ 1.79], p < 0.0001). The survival advantage of OSR and DFSR increased with time. Subgroup analysis of OS and DFS suggested that TA remained the preferred approach among all subgroups. More total/positive lymph nodes were retrieved, and fewer lymph node recurrences were found in the TA group. The analysis of perioperative outcomes revealed that the TA procedure was longer, had more intraoperative blood loss, and prolonged hospital stay. Similar R0 resection rates, as well as total recurrence, local recurrence, liver recurrence, peritoneal recurrence, lung recurrence, anastomosis recurrence and multiple recurrence rates, were found between the two groups. The safety analysis showed that the TT procedure led to more total complications, anastomotic leakages, cases of pneumonia, and cases of pleural effusion. CONCLUSIONS: The TA procedure appeared to be a suitable choice for patients with Siewert type II EGJA because of its association with longer survival, fewer recurrences, and better safety. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11640-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10662530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106625302023-11-21 Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zheng, Hongyang Yin, Xingmei Pan, Tiewen Tao, Xiandong Xu, Xiaolin Li, Zhenjia BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Whether a transthoracic (TT) procedure by a thoracic surgeon or a transabdominal (TA) by a gastrointestinal surgeon is best for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA) remains unknown. Survival and perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups in this meta-analysis to clarify this argument. METHODS: We searched 7 databases for eligible studies comparing TT and TA procedures for Siewert type II EGJA. The final analyzed endpoints included intraoperative and hospitalization outcomes, recurrence, complication, and survival. RESULTS: Seventeen studies involving 10,756 patients met the inclusion criteria. The TA group had higher rates of overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.31 [1.20 ~ 1.44], p < 0.00001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 1.49 [1.24 ~ 1.79], p < 0.0001). The survival advantage of OSR and DFSR increased with time. Subgroup analysis of OS and DFS suggested that TA remained the preferred approach among all subgroups. More total/positive lymph nodes were retrieved, and fewer lymph node recurrences were found in the TA group. The analysis of perioperative outcomes revealed that the TA procedure was longer, had more intraoperative blood loss, and prolonged hospital stay. Similar R0 resection rates, as well as total recurrence, local recurrence, liver recurrence, peritoneal recurrence, lung recurrence, anastomosis recurrence and multiple recurrence rates, were found between the two groups. The safety analysis showed that the TT procedure led to more total complications, anastomotic leakages, cases of pneumonia, and cases of pleural effusion. CONCLUSIONS: The TA procedure appeared to be a suitable choice for patients with Siewert type II EGJA because of its association with longer survival, fewer recurrences, and better safety. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11640-5. BioMed Central 2023-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10662530/ /pubmed/37990193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11640-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zheng, Hongyang
Yin, Xingmei
Pan, Tiewen
Tao, Xiandong
Xu, Xiaolin
Li, Zhenjia
Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effect of different surgical approaches on the survival and safety of siewert type ii esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11640-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenghongyang effectofdifferentsurgicalapproachesonthesurvivalandsafetyofsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinxingmei effectofdifferentsurgicalapproachesonthesurvivalandsafetyofsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pantiewen effectofdifferentsurgicalapproachesonthesurvivalandsafetyofsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taoxiandong effectofdifferentsurgicalapproachesonthesurvivalandsafetyofsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuxiaolin effectofdifferentsurgicalapproachesonthesurvivalandsafetyofsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lizhenjia effectofdifferentsurgicalapproachesonthesurvivalandsafetyofsiewerttypeiiesophagogastricjunctionadenocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis