Cargando…

Towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: A qualitative study of residents

BACKGROUND: Understanding what promotes or hinders a community’s capacity to serve the priorities of its residents is essential for the alignment of citizen needs and governance. Participatory approaches that engage community residents on the topic of community wellbeing are useful methods for defin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michalski, Camilla, Ragunathan, Apira, Foster, Adrian, Pagalan, Lief, Chu, Casey, Diemert, Lori M., Helliwell, John F., Urajnik, Diana, Speidel, Ruth, Malti, Tina, Fierheller, Dianne, Fusca, Laura, Zenlea, Ian, McKean, Scott, Rosella, Laura C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37988338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294721
_version_ 1785148590247641088
author Michalski, Camilla
Ragunathan, Apira
Foster, Adrian
Pagalan, Lief
Chu, Casey
Diemert, Lori M.
Helliwell, John F.
Urajnik, Diana
Speidel, Ruth
Malti, Tina
Fierheller, Dianne
Fusca, Laura
Zenlea, Ian
McKean, Scott
Rosella, Laura C.
author_facet Michalski, Camilla
Ragunathan, Apira
Foster, Adrian
Pagalan, Lief
Chu, Casey
Diemert, Lori M.
Helliwell, John F.
Urajnik, Diana
Speidel, Ruth
Malti, Tina
Fierheller, Dianne
Fusca, Laura
Zenlea, Ian
McKean, Scott
Rosella, Laura C.
author_sort Michalski, Camilla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding what promotes or hinders a community’s capacity to serve the priorities of its residents is essential for the alignment of citizen needs and governance. Participatory approaches that engage community residents on the topic of community wellbeing are useful methods for defining outcomes that reflect a community’s goals and priorities. Using qualitative focus group methods, the aim of this study was to outline bottom-up definitions of community wellbeing from a diverse pool of community residents in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Semi-structured, two-hour group interviews were conducted with adult (≥18 years) participants (N = 15) residing in four communities across Canada’s largest province of Ontario. Participants were purposively selected from a pool of screening questionnaires to ensure diverse group compositions based on race, gender, age, and educational attainment. Interviews were thematically analysed using descriptive and interpretive methods to characterize resident conceptions of community wellbeing. RESULTS: Focus group participants were between 18 and 75 years of age and most had lived in their local community for 5 or more years. Four major themes emerged: (1) a sense of community belonging is cultivated through shared spaces, routines, support, and identities; (2) a community constitutes the amenities and social contexts that enable residents to thrive; (3) effective regional decision-making must be community-informed; and (4) the wellbeing of a community relies on equal opportunities for engagement and participation. CONCLUSIONS: Residents described their communities and their associated wellbeing as a combination of accessible amenities and opportunities to engage without marginalization. This study underscores the value of participatory approaches in community wellbeing research, where the viewpoint and life experience of residents is used to inform local decision-making and service delivery. Future research will capture more diverse perspectives towards community belonging, particularly from community newcomers, for the development of regionally appropriate indicators of community wellbeing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10662708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106627082023-11-21 Towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: A qualitative study of residents Michalski, Camilla Ragunathan, Apira Foster, Adrian Pagalan, Lief Chu, Casey Diemert, Lori M. Helliwell, John F. Urajnik, Diana Speidel, Ruth Malti, Tina Fierheller, Dianne Fusca, Laura Zenlea, Ian McKean, Scott Rosella, Laura C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding what promotes or hinders a community’s capacity to serve the priorities of its residents is essential for the alignment of citizen needs and governance. Participatory approaches that engage community residents on the topic of community wellbeing are useful methods for defining outcomes that reflect a community’s goals and priorities. Using qualitative focus group methods, the aim of this study was to outline bottom-up definitions of community wellbeing from a diverse pool of community residents in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Semi-structured, two-hour group interviews were conducted with adult (≥18 years) participants (N = 15) residing in four communities across Canada’s largest province of Ontario. Participants were purposively selected from a pool of screening questionnaires to ensure diverse group compositions based on race, gender, age, and educational attainment. Interviews were thematically analysed using descriptive and interpretive methods to characterize resident conceptions of community wellbeing. RESULTS: Focus group participants were between 18 and 75 years of age and most had lived in their local community for 5 or more years. Four major themes emerged: (1) a sense of community belonging is cultivated through shared spaces, routines, support, and identities; (2) a community constitutes the amenities and social contexts that enable residents to thrive; (3) effective regional decision-making must be community-informed; and (4) the wellbeing of a community relies on equal opportunities for engagement and participation. CONCLUSIONS: Residents described their communities and their associated wellbeing as a combination of accessible amenities and opportunities to engage without marginalization. This study underscores the value of participatory approaches in community wellbeing research, where the viewpoint and life experience of residents is used to inform local decision-making and service delivery. Future research will capture more diverse perspectives towards community belonging, particularly from community newcomers, for the development of regionally appropriate indicators of community wellbeing. Public Library of Science 2023-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10662708/ /pubmed/37988338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294721 Text en © 2023 Michalski et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Michalski, Camilla
Ragunathan, Apira
Foster, Adrian
Pagalan, Lief
Chu, Casey
Diemert, Lori M.
Helliwell, John F.
Urajnik, Diana
Speidel, Ruth
Malti, Tina
Fierheller, Dianne
Fusca, Laura
Zenlea, Ian
McKean, Scott
Rosella, Laura C.
Towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: A qualitative study of residents
title Towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: A qualitative study of residents
title_full Towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: A qualitative study of residents
title_fullStr Towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: A qualitative study of residents
title_full_unstemmed Towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: A qualitative study of residents
title_short Towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: A qualitative study of residents
title_sort towards a community-driven definition of community wellbeing: a qualitative study of residents
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37988338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294721
work_keys_str_mv AT michalskicamilla towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT ragunathanapira towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT fosteradrian towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT pagalanlief towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT chucasey towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT diemertlorim towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT helliwelljohnf towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT urajnikdiana towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT speidelruth towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT maltitina towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT fierhellerdianne towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT fuscalaura towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT zenleaian towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT mckeanscott towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents
AT rosellalaurac towardsacommunitydrivendefinitionofcommunitywellbeingaqualitativestudyofresidents