Cargando…

The utility of a genetic progression risk test for Barrett esophagus

This study sought to characterize the utility of a gene methylation-based biomarker test that has been validated to predict progression towards esophageal adenocarcinoma. Barrett esophagus (BE) is a precursor condition for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) with somewhat variable approaches among gastr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gong, Dennis, Lunz, Daniel, Stover, James S., Meltzer, Stephen J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030503
_version_ 1785138283629510656
author Gong, Dennis
Lunz, Daniel
Stover, James S.
Meltzer, Stephen J.
author_facet Gong, Dennis
Lunz, Daniel
Stover, James S.
Meltzer, Stephen J.
author_sort Gong, Dennis
collection PubMed
description This study sought to characterize the utility of a gene methylation-based biomarker test that has been validated to predict progression towards esophageal adenocarcinoma. Barrett esophagus (BE) is a precursor condition for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) with somewhat variable approaches among gastroenterologists toward managing neoplastic progression risk. Capsulomics has developed a validated multigene DNA methylation-based biomarker assay performed on BE biopsies designed to address this variability by classifying BE patients into progression risk groups. In the current study, a survey was administered to practicing gastroenterologists in order to assess the potential impact of this assay on clinical practice. In this context, 89% (95% Cl: 85.4–92.6%) of surveyed physicians felt strongly that the multigene Barrett Esophagus test helped resolve uncertainties and optimize care of patients with BE by impacting their decisions on surveillance intervals and use of active treatments, such as ablation. The assay significantly impacted surveillance intervals for both high-risk (22.0 no assay vs 12.3 months with assay; P = 1.7E-8) and low-risk (7.9 no assay vs 11.4 months with assay, P = 8.8E-4) stratified case results. Finally, the assay also significantly impacted decisions to pursue active ablation treatments in both high-risk (5% recommending ablation without assay vs 42% with assay; P = 3.7E-11) and low-risk (42% recommending ablation without assay vs 29% with assay; P = .049) stratified case results. Results demonstrated a strong effect of the assay on clinical decision making, even in conjunction with established clinical guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10662832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106628322022-09-16 The utility of a genetic progression risk test for Barrett esophagus Gong, Dennis Lunz, Daniel Stover, James S. Meltzer, Stephen J. Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article This study sought to characterize the utility of a gene methylation-based biomarker test that has been validated to predict progression towards esophageal adenocarcinoma. Barrett esophagus (BE) is a precursor condition for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) with somewhat variable approaches among gastroenterologists toward managing neoplastic progression risk. Capsulomics has developed a validated multigene DNA methylation-based biomarker assay performed on BE biopsies designed to address this variability by classifying BE patients into progression risk groups. In the current study, a survey was administered to practicing gastroenterologists in order to assess the potential impact of this assay on clinical practice. In this context, 89% (95% Cl: 85.4–92.6%) of surveyed physicians felt strongly that the multigene Barrett Esophagus test helped resolve uncertainties and optimize care of patients with BE by impacting their decisions on surveillance intervals and use of active treatments, such as ablation. The assay significantly impacted surveillance intervals for both high-risk (22.0 no assay vs 12.3 months with assay; P = 1.7E-8) and low-risk (7.9 no assay vs 11.4 months with assay, P = 8.8E-4) stratified case results. Finally, the assay also significantly impacted decisions to pursue active ablation treatments in both high-risk (5% recommending ablation without assay vs 42% with assay; P = 3.7E-11) and low-risk (42% recommending ablation without assay vs 29% with assay; P = .049) stratified case results. Results demonstrated a strong effect of the assay on clinical decision making, even in conjunction with established clinical guidelines. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10662832/ /pubmed/36123898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030503 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gong, Dennis
Lunz, Daniel
Stover, James S.
Meltzer, Stephen J.
The utility of a genetic progression risk test for Barrett esophagus
title The utility of a genetic progression risk test for Barrett esophagus
title_full The utility of a genetic progression risk test for Barrett esophagus
title_fullStr The utility of a genetic progression risk test for Barrett esophagus
title_full_unstemmed The utility of a genetic progression risk test for Barrett esophagus
title_short The utility of a genetic progression risk test for Barrett esophagus
title_sort utility of a genetic progression risk test for barrett esophagus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36123898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030503
work_keys_str_mv AT gongdennis theutilityofageneticprogressionrisktestforbarrettesophagus
AT lunzdaniel theutilityofageneticprogressionrisktestforbarrettesophagus
AT stoverjamess theutilityofageneticprogressionrisktestforbarrettesophagus
AT meltzerstephenj theutilityofageneticprogressionrisktestforbarrettesophagus
AT gongdennis utilityofageneticprogressionrisktestforbarrettesophagus
AT lunzdaniel utilityofageneticprogressionrisktestforbarrettesophagus
AT stoverjamess utilityofageneticprogressionrisktestforbarrettesophagus
AT meltzerstephenj utilityofageneticprogressionrisktestforbarrettesophagus