Cargando…

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of SMAD4 in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and database validation

The relationship between SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4) and the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is unclear. Our aim was to investigate the association between SMAD4 expression and clinicopathological parameters and NSCLC prognosis. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhiqiang, Huang, Yunfei, Zhou, Rongsheng, Li, Zhicheng, Yan, Qitao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37478236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034312
Descripción
Sumario:The relationship between SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4) and the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is unclear. Our aim was to investigate the association between SMAD4 expression and clinicopathological parameters and NSCLC prognosis. METHODS: We searched articles in databases from inception to July 2022 to retrieve literature related to SMAD4 expression and the clinicopathological and/or prognostic significance of NSCLC patients. Odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. We evaluated the expression of SMAD4 and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC using the Kaplan–Meier plotter database. RESULTS: Eight articles with 1461 NSCLC patients were included. SMAD4 expression was related to tumor differentiation (OR = 0.359, 95% CI: 0.238–0.543, P = .000), lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.469, 95% CI: 0.04–0.725, P = .001), tumor node metastasis stage (OR = 0.238, 95% CI: 0.156–0.362, P = .000) and good OS (HR = 0.592, 95% CI: 0.332–0.853, P = .000) in NSCLC. There was no significant association between SMAD4 expression and age (OR = 0.822, 95% CI: 0.515–1.312, P = .411) or sex (OR = 1.056, 95% CI: 0.675–1.653, P = .811). Furthermore, SMAD4 expression was lower in NSCLC, and a good prognosis in NSCLC (HR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.51–0.72, P = 4.2 e-9) was shown to correlate with higher SMAD4 expression using the Kaplan–Meier Plotter database. CONCLUSION: SMAD4 expression is lower in NSCLC and correlated with lymph node metastasis, tumor differentiation, tumor node metastasis stage and good OS for NSCLC patients.