Cargando…
Aortic propagation velocity in predicting coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Coronary artery disease (CAD) and its outcome, myocardial infarction, is yet a significant etiology of mortality and morbidity nowadays. The aortic propagation velocity (APV) can be a simple, straightforward and novel echocardiographic index for the risk stratification in the evaluation of CAD. In t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37478268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034243 |
Sumario: | Coronary artery disease (CAD) and its outcome, myocardial infarction, is yet a significant etiology of mortality and morbidity nowadays. The aortic propagation velocity (APV) can be a simple, straightforward and novel echocardiographic index for the risk stratification in the evaluation of CAD. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the predictive role of APV in CAD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Relevant electronic bibliographies (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, EMbase, the Cochrane library) were explored. Related reports were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-analysis 2.0 software. RESULTS: Eventually, 5 articles met the inclusion criteria and included in the meta-analysis. Five studies with 490 patients reported the APV mean in CAD and non-CAD groups. A random-effect model was used and the pooled findings demonstrated a significant higher APV in non-CAD group compared to CAD group (SMD: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.70–3.07, P < .001, I(2): 84%, Q: 19.03). The diagnostic value of APV in predicting CAD showed 86.3% sensitivity (95% CI: 74–91, P value < .001, I(2): 65%, Q: 8.53, P value: .03) and 83.8% specificity (95% CI: 69–94, P value < .001, I(2): 60%, Q: 9.89, P value: .01). CONCLUSION: There was a predictive role of APV in CAD with suitable specificity and sensitivity. Moreover, aortic distensibility and aortic strain were significantly different in CAD and non-CAD patients. APV could be used as a good noninvasive tool for screening CAD. |
---|