Cargando…
Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis
BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) have been widely used to treat carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) in China. However, systematic evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TCPMs for CAP is still unknown, and the comparative efficacy of different TCPMs is unclear. OBJECTIVES: Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13020-023-00850-5 |
_version_ | 1785148613340430336 |
---|---|
author | Su, Wenquan Xie, Xiaolong Zhao, Jiping Fan, Qinhua Dong, Naijia Li, Qingxiao Du, Yawei Wu, Shengxian |
author_facet | Su, Wenquan Xie, Xiaolong Zhao, Jiping Fan, Qinhua Dong, Naijia Li, Qingxiao Du, Yawei Wu, Shengxian |
author_sort | Su, Wenquan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) have been widely used to treat carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) in China. However, systematic evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TCPMs for CAP is still unknown, and the comparative efficacy of different TCPMs is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare and rank the effectiveness and safety of different TCPMs in treating CAP using a Bayesian network meta− analysis (NMA). METHODS: This NMA was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta− Analyses (PRISMA) Extension Statement. Eight databases were searched from their inception to August 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The articles regarding eligibility and extracted data were screened independently by two authors. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate quality and bias. The change of carotid artery intimal− medial thickness (IMT), carotid maximal plaque area, carotid atherosclerotic plaque Course score, serum lipid levels, CRP, and adverse events rate (AER) were used as outcomes. Data from each RCTs were first pooled using random− effect pairwise meta− analyses and illustrated as odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). NMAs were performed using Stata17.0 software and the GeMTC package of R software to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of TCPMs, and displayed as ORs or SMDs with 95% CI. A Bayesian hierarchical random− effects model was used to conduct NMAs using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm. The GRADE partially contextualised framework was applied for NMA result interpretation. RESULTS: NMA included 27 RCT trials with 4131 patients and nine types of TCPMs. Pairwise meta− analyses indicated that Conventional Western medicine (CWM) + TCPM was superior to CWM in reducing the IMT (SMD: − 1.26; 95% CI − 1.59 to − 0.93), the carotid maximal plaque area (SMD − 1.27; 95% CI − 1.71, − 0.82) and the carotid atherosclerotic plaque Course score (SMD − 0.72; 95% CI 95% CI − 1.20, − 0.25). NMAs demonstrated that CWM + Jiangzhiling pill (JZL) with SUCRA 70.6% exhibited the highest effective intervention for reducing IMT. CWM + SXBX (Shexiang baoxin pill) was superior to other TCPMs in reducing the carotid maximal plaque area (83.0%), the atherosclerotic plaque Course score (92.5%), TC (95.6%) and LDL (92.6%) levels. CWM + NXT (Naoxintong capsule), CWM + XS (Xiaoshuang granules/enteric capsule), and CWM + ZBT (Zhibitai) were superior to other CPMs in improving TG (90.1%), HDL (86.1%), and CRP (92.6%), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: For CAP patients, CWM + XSBX was among the most effective in reducing carotid maximal plaque area, atherosclerotic plaque Course score, TC and LDL levels, and CWM + JZL was the most effective in reducing IMT. Overall, CWM + XSBX may be considered an effective intervention for the treatment of CAP. This study provides reference and evidence for the clinical optimization of TCPM selection in CAP treatment. More adequately powered, well− designed clinical trials to increase the quality of the available evidence are still needed in the future due to several limitations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13020-023-00850-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10662928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106629282023-11-20 Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis Su, Wenquan Xie, Xiaolong Zhao, Jiping Fan, Qinhua Dong, Naijia Li, Qingxiao Du, Yawei Wu, Shengxian Chin Med Review BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) have been widely used to treat carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) in China. However, systematic evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TCPMs for CAP is still unknown, and the comparative efficacy of different TCPMs is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare and rank the effectiveness and safety of different TCPMs in treating CAP using a Bayesian network meta− analysis (NMA). METHODS: This NMA was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta− Analyses (PRISMA) Extension Statement. Eight databases were searched from their inception to August 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The articles regarding eligibility and extracted data were screened independently by two authors. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate quality and bias. The change of carotid artery intimal− medial thickness (IMT), carotid maximal plaque area, carotid atherosclerotic plaque Course score, serum lipid levels, CRP, and adverse events rate (AER) were used as outcomes. Data from each RCTs were first pooled using random− effect pairwise meta− analyses and illustrated as odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). NMAs were performed using Stata17.0 software and the GeMTC package of R software to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of TCPMs, and displayed as ORs or SMDs with 95% CI. A Bayesian hierarchical random− effects model was used to conduct NMAs using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm. The GRADE partially contextualised framework was applied for NMA result interpretation. RESULTS: NMA included 27 RCT trials with 4131 patients and nine types of TCPMs. Pairwise meta− analyses indicated that Conventional Western medicine (CWM) + TCPM was superior to CWM in reducing the IMT (SMD: − 1.26; 95% CI − 1.59 to − 0.93), the carotid maximal plaque area (SMD − 1.27; 95% CI − 1.71, − 0.82) and the carotid atherosclerotic plaque Course score (SMD − 0.72; 95% CI 95% CI − 1.20, − 0.25). NMAs demonstrated that CWM + Jiangzhiling pill (JZL) with SUCRA 70.6% exhibited the highest effective intervention for reducing IMT. CWM + SXBX (Shexiang baoxin pill) was superior to other TCPMs in reducing the carotid maximal plaque area (83.0%), the atherosclerotic plaque Course score (92.5%), TC (95.6%) and LDL (92.6%) levels. CWM + NXT (Naoxintong capsule), CWM + XS (Xiaoshuang granules/enteric capsule), and CWM + ZBT (Zhibitai) were superior to other CPMs in improving TG (90.1%), HDL (86.1%), and CRP (92.6%), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: For CAP patients, CWM + XSBX was among the most effective in reducing carotid maximal plaque area, atherosclerotic plaque Course score, TC and LDL levels, and CWM + JZL was the most effective in reducing IMT. Overall, CWM + XSBX may be considered an effective intervention for the treatment of CAP. This study provides reference and evidence for the clinical optimization of TCPM selection in CAP treatment. More adequately powered, well− designed clinical trials to increase the quality of the available evidence are still needed in the future due to several limitations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13020-023-00850-5. BioMed Central 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10662928/ /pubmed/37986011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13020-023-00850-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Su, Wenquan Xie, Xiaolong Zhao, Jiping Fan, Qinhua Dong, Naijia Li, Qingxiao Du, Yawei Wu, Shengxian Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a bayesian network meta− analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13020-023-00850-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suwenquan comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT xiexiaolong comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT zhaojiping comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT fanqinhua comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT dongnaijia comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT liqingxiao comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT duyawei comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT wushengxian comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis |