Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis

BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) have been widely used to treat carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) in China. However, systematic evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TCPMs for CAP is still unknown, and the comparative efficacy of different TCPMs is unclear. OBJECTIVES: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Wenquan, Xie, Xiaolong, Zhao, Jiping, Fan, Qinhua, Dong, Naijia, Li, Qingxiao, Du, Yawei, Wu, Shengxian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13020-023-00850-5
_version_ 1785148613340430336
author Su, Wenquan
Xie, Xiaolong
Zhao, Jiping
Fan, Qinhua
Dong, Naijia
Li, Qingxiao
Du, Yawei
Wu, Shengxian
author_facet Su, Wenquan
Xie, Xiaolong
Zhao, Jiping
Fan, Qinhua
Dong, Naijia
Li, Qingxiao
Du, Yawei
Wu, Shengxian
author_sort Su, Wenquan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) have been widely used to treat carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) in China. However, systematic evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TCPMs for CAP is still unknown, and the comparative efficacy of different TCPMs is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare and rank the effectiveness and safety of different TCPMs in treating CAP using a Bayesian network meta− analysis (NMA). METHODS: This NMA was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta− Analyses (PRISMA) Extension Statement. Eight databases were searched from their inception to August 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The articles regarding eligibility and extracted data were screened independently by two authors. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate quality and bias. The change of carotid artery intimal− medial thickness (IMT), carotid maximal plaque area, carotid atherosclerotic plaque Course score, serum lipid levels, CRP, and adverse events rate (AER) were used as outcomes. Data from each RCTs were first pooled using random− effect pairwise meta− analyses and illustrated as odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). NMAs were performed using Stata17.0 software and the GeMTC package of R software to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of TCPMs, and displayed as ORs or SMDs with 95% CI. A Bayesian hierarchical random− effects model was used to conduct NMAs using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm. The GRADE partially contextualised framework was applied for NMA result interpretation. RESULTS: NMA included 27 RCT trials with 4131 patients and nine types of TCPMs. Pairwise meta− analyses indicated that Conventional Western medicine (CWM) + TCPM was superior to CWM in reducing the IMT (SMD: − 1.26; 95% CI − 1.59 to − 0.93), the carotid maximal plaque area (SMD − 1.27; 95% CI − 1.71, − 0.82) and the carotid atherosclerotic plaque Course score (SMD − 0.72; 95% CI 95% CI − 1.20, − 0.25). NMAs demonstrated that CWM + Jiangzhiling pill (JZL) with SUCRA 70.6% exhibited the highest effective intervention for reducing IMT. CWM + SXBX (Shexiang baoxin pill) was superior to other TCPMs in reducing the carotid maximal plaque area (83.0%), the atherosclerotic plaque Course score (92.5%), TC (95.6%) and LDL (92.6%) levels. CWM + NXT (Naoxintong capsule), CWM + XS (Xiaoshuang granules/enteric capsule), and CWM + ZBT (Zhibitai) were superior to other CPMs in improving TG (90.1%), HDL (86.1%), and CRP (92.6%), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: For CAP patients, CWM + XSBX was among the most effective in reducing carotid maximal plaque area, atherosclerotic plaque Course score, TC and LDL levels, and CWM + JZL was the most effective in reducing IMT. Overall, CWM + XSBX may be considered an effective intervention for the treatment of CAP. This study provides reference and evidence for the clinical optimization of TCPM selection in CAP treatment. More adequately powered, well− designed clinical trials to increase the quality of the available evidence are still needed in the future due to several limitations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13020-023-00850-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10662928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106629282023-11-20 Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis Su, Wenquan Xie, Xiaolong Zhao, Jiping Fan, Qinhua Dong, Naijia Li, Qingxiao Du, Yawei Wu, Shengxian Chin Med Review BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) have been widely used to treat carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) in China. However, systematic evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TCPMs for CAP is still unknown, and the comparative efficacy of different TCPMs is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare and rank the effectiveness and safety of different TCPMs in treating CAP using a Bayesian network meta− analysis (NMA). METHODS: This NMA was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta− Analyses (PRISMA) Extension Statement. Eight databases were searched from their inception to August 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The articles regarding eligibility and extracted data were screened independently by two authors. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate quality and bias. The change of carotid artery intimal− medial thickness (IMT), carotid maximal plaque area, carotid atherosclerotic plaque Course score, serum lipid levels, CRP, and adverse events rate (AER) were used as outcomes. Data from each RCTs were first pooled using random− effect pairwise meta− analyses and illustrated as odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). NMAs were performed using Stata17.0 software and the GeMTC package of R software to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of TCPMs, and displayed as ORs or SMDs with 95% CI. A Bayesian hierarchical random− effects model was used to conduct NMAs using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm. The GRADE partially contextualised framework was applied for NMA result interpretation. RESULTS: NMA included 27 RCT trials with 4131 patients and nine types of TCPMs. Pairwise meta− analyses indicated that Conventional Western medicine (CWM) + TCPM was superior to CWM in reducing the IMT (SMD: − 1.26; 95% CI − 1.59 to − 0.93), the carotid maximal plaque area (SMD − 1.27; 95% CI − 1.71, − 0.82) and the carotid atherosclerotic plaque Course score (SMD − 0.72; 95% CI 95% CI − 1.20, − 0.25). NMAs demonstrated that CWM + Jiangzhiling pill (JZL) with SUCRA 70.6% exhibited the highest effective intervention for reducing IMT. CWM + SXBX (Shexiang baoxin pill) was superior to other TCPMs in reducing the carotid maximal plaque area (83.0%), the atherosclerotic plaque Course score (92.5%), TC (95.6%) and LDL (92.6%) levels. CWM + NXT (Naoxintong capsule), CWM + XS (Xiaoshuang granules/enteric capsule), and CWM + ZBT (Zhibitai) were superior to other CPMs in improving TG (90.1%), HDL (86.1%), and CRP (92.6%), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: For CAP patients, CWM + XSBX was among the most effective in reducing carotid maximal plaque area, atherosclerotic plaque Course score, TC and LDL levels, and CWM + JZL was the most effective in reducing IMT. Overall, CWM + XSBX may be considered an effective intervention for the treatment of CAP. This study provides reference and evidence for the clinical optimization of TCPM selection in CAP treatment. More adequately powered, well− designed clinical trials to increase the quality of the available evidence are still needed in the future due to several limitations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13020-023-00850-5. BioMed Central 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10662928/ /pubmed/37986011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13020-023-00850-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Su, Wenquan
Xie, Xiaolong
Zhao, Jiping
Fan, Qinhua
Dong, Naijia
Li, Qingxiao
Du, Yawei
Wu, Shengxian
Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis
title Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta− analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a bayesian network meta− analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37986011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13020-023-00850-5
work_keys_str_mv AT suwenquan comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT xiexiaolong comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhaojiping comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT fanqinhua comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT dongnaijia comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT liqingxiao comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT duyawei comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT wushengxian comparativeefficacyofchinesepatentmedicinesinpatientswithcarotidatheroscleroticplaqueabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis