Cargando…

Histological Compatibility in Distal Neurotizations: A Systematic Review

Considering the importance of defining the minimum number of axons between recipient and donor branches, that is, the definition of histological compatibility in distal neurotizations for the success of the procedure and the surgeon's freedom to choose individualized strategies for each patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cavalheiro, Cristina Schmitt, Nakamoto, João Carlos, Wei, Teng Hsiang, Sorrenti, Luiz, Wataya, Erick Yoshio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10663082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774385
_version_ 1785138319651241984
author Cavalheiro, Cristina Schmitt
Nakamoto, João Carlos
Wei, Teng Hsiang
Sorrenti, Luiz
Wataya, Erick Yoshio
author_facet Cavalheiro, Cristina Schmitt
Nakamoto, João Carlos
Wei, Teng Hsiang
Sorrenti, Luiz
Wataya, Erick Yoshio
author_sort Cavalheiro, Cristina Schmitt
collection PubMed
description Considering the importance of defining the minimum number of axons between recipient and donor branches, that is, the definition of histological compatibility in distal neurotizations for the success of the procedure and the surgeon's freedom to choose individualized strategies for each patient, this systematic review was conducted to find out the most recent studies on the subject. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the importance of the number of axons and the relationship between axon counts in the donor and recipient nerves in the success of nerve transfer. A literature review was performed on five international databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Wiley (Cochrane Database), Embase, and PubMed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed (2020 version), a guide designed to guide the elaboration of systematic literature reviews. One hundred and fifty-seven studies were found, and 23 were selected based on the eligibility criteria. The articles presented were conclusive in determining the importance of the number of axons in the success of nerve transfer. Still, the relationship between the number of axons in the donor and recipient nerves seems more relevant in the success of transfers and is not always explored by the authors. The review of the articles has provided compelling evidence that the number of axons is a critical determinant of the success of nerve transfer procedures. However, the relationship between the number of axons in the donor nerve and that in the recipient nerve appears to be even more crucial for successful transfers, a factor that is not always adequately explored by authors in the existing literature. Level of evidence : Level IV, therapeutic study
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10663082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106630822023-09-01 Histological Compatibility in Distal Neurotizations: A Systematic Review Cavalheiro, Cristina Schmitt Nakamoto, João Carlos Wei, Teng Hsiang Sorrenti, Luiz Wataya, Erick Yoshio Indian J Plast Surg Considering the importance of defining the minimum number of axons between recipient and donor branches, that is, the definition of histological compatibility in distal neurotizations for the success of the procedure and the surgeon's freedom to choose individualized strategies for each patient, this systematic review was conducted to find out the most recent studies on the subject. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the importance of the number of axons and the relationship between axon counts in the donor and recipient nerves in the success of nerve transfer. A literature review was performed on five international databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Wiley (Cochrane Database), Embase, and PubMed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed (2020 version), a guide designed to guide the elaboration of systematic literature reviews. One hundred and fifty-seven studies were found, and 23 were selected based on the eligibility criteria. The articles presented were conclusive in determining the importance of the number of axons in the success of nerve transfer. Still, the relationship between the number of axons in the donor and recipient nerves seems more relevant in the success of transfers and is not always explored by the authors. The review of the articles has provided compelling evidence that the number of axons is a critical determinant of the success of nerve transfer procedures. However, the relationship between the number of axons in the donor nerve and that in the recipient nerve appears to be even more crucial for successful transfers, a factor that is not always adequately explored by authors in the existing literature. Level of evidence : Level IV, therapeutic study Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10663082/ /pubmed/38026776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774385 Text en Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cavalheiro, Cristina Schmitt
Nakamoto, João Carlos
Wei, Teng Hsiang
Sorrenti, Luiz
Wataya, Erick Yoshio
Histological Compatibility in Distal Neurotizations: A Systematic Review
title Histological Compatibility in Distal Neurotizations: A Systematic Review
title_full Histological Compatibility in Distal Neurotizations: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Histological Compatibility in Distal Neurotizations: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Histological Compatibility in Distal Neurotizations: A Systematic Review
title_short Histological Compatibility in Distal Neurotizations: A Systematic Review
title_sort histological compatibility in distal neurotizations: a systematic review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10663082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774385
work_keys_str_mv AT cavalheirocristinaschmitt histologicalcompatibilityindistalneurotizationsasystematicreview
AT nakamotojoaocarlos histologicalcompatibilityindistalneurotizationsasystematicreview
AT weitenghsiang histologicalcompatibilityindistalneurotizationsasystematicreview
AT sorrentiluiz histologicalcompatibilityindistalneurotizationsasystematicreview
AT watayaerickyoshio histologicalcompatibilityindistalneurotizationsasystematicreview