Cargando…

Adaptation of the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale: Turkish version validity and reliability study

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to adapt the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale (CED) for use in Turkey and to contribute to the Turkish literature by conducting a validity and reliability study on the scale. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: The study sample consisted of 369 volunteers between 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Güler, Çiğdem Yavuz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10663714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38013695
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.103578
_version_ 1785148680366456832
author Güler, Çiğdem Yavuz
author_facet Güler, Çiğdem Yavuz
author_sort Güler, Çiğdem Yavuz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to adapt the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale (CED) for use in Turkey and to contribute to the Turkish literature by conducting a validity and reliability study on the scale. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: The study sample consisted of 369 volunteers between 18 and 52 years of age: 279 females (75.6%) and 90 males (24.4%), selected by the convenience sampling method. The construct validity of the scale was first tested with exploratory factor analysis and subsequently with confirmatory factor analysis. The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-42) and the Differentiation of Self Inventory-Short Form (DSI-SF) were used to test the convergent validity of the scale. The reliability of the scale was calculated by internal consistency and test-retest methods. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the scale has a single factor structure. In the Turkish version of the scale, the 14th item was removed from the scale due to its low factor loading. The Cronbach’s α internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be .86 while the test-retest reliability coefficient was calculated as .76. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicates that the Turkish version of the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale constitutes a reliable and valid measurement tool for use with a sample in Turkey.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10663714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106637142023-11-27 Adaptation of the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale: Turkish version validity and reliability study Güler, Çiğdem Yavuz Curr Issues Personal Psychol Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to adapt the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale (CED) for use in Turkey and to contribute to the Turkish literature by conducting a validity and reliability study on the scale. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: The study sample consisted of 369 volunteers between 18 and 52 years of age: 279 females (75.6%) and 90 males (24.4%), selected by the convenience sampling method. The construct validity of the scale was first tested with exploratory factor analysis and subsequently with confirmatory factor analysis. The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-42) and the Differentiation of Self Inventory-Short Form (DSI-SF) were used to test the convergent validity of the scale. The reliability of the scale was calculated by internal consistency and test-retest methods. RESULTS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the scale has a single factor structure. In the Turkish version of the scale, the 14th item was removed from the scale due to its low factor loading. The Cronbach’s α internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be .86 while the test-retest reliability coefficient was calculated as .76. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicates that the Turkish version of the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale constitutes a reliable and valid measurement tool for use with a sample in Turkey. Termedia Publishing House 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10663714/ /pubmed/38013695 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.103578 Text en Copyright © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Article
Güler, Çiğdem Yavuz
Adaptation of the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale: Turkish version validity and reliability study
title Adaptation of the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale: Turkish version validity and reliability study
title_full Adaptation of the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale: Turkish version validity and reliability study
title_fullStr Adaptation of the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale: Turkish version validity and reliability study
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation of the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale: Turkish version validity and reliability study
title_short Adaptation of the Chabot Emotional Differentiation Scale: Turkish version validity and reliability study
title_sort adaptation of the chabot emotional differentiation scale: turkish version validity and reliability study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10663714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38013695
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.103578
work_keys_str_mv AT gulercigdemyavuz adaptationofthechabotemotionaldifferentiationscaleturkishversionvalidityandreliabilitystudy