Cargando…

The community voices program to facilitate community–academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program’s usefulness

INTRODUCTION: The Institute of Translational Health Sciences (Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program hub) developed a program coined Community Voices to invite communities to submit project ideas and be matched with academic researchers. We describe formative research to understand commun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramirez, Magaly, Wool, Jenny, Bishop, Sonia, Hara-Hubbard, KeliAnne K., Jang, Sou Hyun, Leong, Judy, Hassell, Laurie, Ko, Linda K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10663767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38028353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.657
_version_ 1785138471405355008
author Ramirez, Magaly
Wool, Jenny
Bishop, Sonia
Hara-Hubbard, KeliAnne K.
Jang, Sou Hyun
Leong, Judy
Hassell, Laurie
Ko, Linda K.
author_facet Ramirez, Magaly
Wool, Jenny
Bishop, Sonia
Hara-Hubbard, KeliAnne K.
Jang, Sou Hyun
Leong, Judy
Hassell, Laurie
Ko, Linda K.
author_sort Ramirez, Magaly
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Institute of Translational Health Sciences (Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program hub) developed a program coined Community Voices to invite communities to submit project ideas and be matched with academic researchers. We describe formative research to understand community and academic researcher perspectives on how the program could facilitate collaborations addressing community priorities. METHODS: We conducted four focus groups with 31 community-based organization (CBO) representatives and 11 semi-structured interviews with academic researchers in the Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho regions. Questions included the appeal of Community Voices to engage community and academic partners, potential program usefulness, and Community Voices’ potential role in building community–academic partnerships. We used an inductive, constant comparison approach to code transcripts and thematic analysis to generate themes. RESULTS: Most CBO representatives were female (87.1%) and Hispanic/Latino (61.3%). Most academic researchers had a PhD (63.6%) and worked at a university (81.8%). The themes were: (1) community–academic partnerships built on trust will offer mutual benefit, (2) community-initiated project ideas should prioritize community needs, (3) matchmaking will accelerate connections but should not replace time to foster partnership, (4) Community Voices should go beyond matchmaking and provide ongoing support/training, and (5) fostering effective communication is key to partnership success. CONCLUSIONS: Community Voices is a novel, bidirectional community engagement program model that advances current practices of prioritizing researchers’ project ideas. This community-driven program may shift the future direction of community engagement practices where prioritizing community’s ideas becomes the norm of community–academic partnerships in clinical and translational science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10663767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106637672023-10-20 The community voices program to facilitate community–academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program’s usefulness Ramirez, Magaly Wool, Jenny Bishop, Sonia Hara-Hubbard, KeliAnne K. Jang, Sou Hyun Leong, Judy Hassell, Laurie Ko, Linda K. J Clin Transl Sci Research Article INTRODUCTION: The Institute of Translational Health Sciences (Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program hub) developed a program coined Community Voices to invite communities to submit project ideas and be matched with academic researchers. We describe formative research to understand community and academic researcher perspectives on how the program could facilitate collaborations addressing community priorities. METHODS: We conducted four focus groups with 31 community-based organization (CBO) representatives and 11 semi-structured interviews with academic researchers in the Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho regions. Questions included the appeal of Community Voices to engage community and academic partners, potential program usefulness, and Community Voices’ potential role in building community–academic partnerships. We used an inductive, constant comparison approach to code transcripts and thematic analysis to generate themes. RESULTS: Most CBO representatives were female (87.1%) and Hispanic/Latino (61.3%). Most academic researchers had a PhD (63.6%) and worked at a university (81.8%). The themes were: (1) community–academic partnerships built on trust will offer mutual benefit, (2) community-initiated project ideas should prioritize community needs, (3) matchmaking will accelerate connections but should not replace time to foster partnership, (4) Community Voices should go beyond matchmaking and provide ongoing support/training, and (5) fostering effective communication is key to partnership success. CONCLUSIONS: Community Voices is a novel, bidirectional community engagement program model that advances current practices of prioritizing researchers’ project ideas. This community-driven program may shift the future direction of community engagement practices where prioritizing community’s ideas becomes the norm of community–academic partnerships in clinical and translational science. Cambridge University Press 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10663767/ /pubmed/38028353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.657 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ramirez, Magaly
Wool, Jenny
Bishop, Sonia
Hara-Hubbard, KeliAnne K.
Jang, Sou Hyun
Leong, Judy
Hassell, Laurie
Ko, Linda K.
The community voices program to facilitate community–academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program’s usefulness
title The community voices program to facilitate community–academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program’s usefulness
title_full The community voices program to facilitate community–academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program’s usefulness
title_fullStr The community voices program to facilitate community–academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program’s usefulness
title_full_unstemmed The community voices program to facilitate community–academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program’s usefulness
title_short The community voices program to facilitate community–academic researcher partnerships: Stakeholder perspectives on the program’s usefulness
title_sort community voices program to facilitate community–academic researcher partnerships: stakeholder perspectives on the program’s usefulness
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10663767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38028353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.657
work_keys_str_mv AT ramirezmagaly thecommunityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT wooljenny thecommunityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT bishopsonia thecommunityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT harahubbardkeliannek thecommunityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT jangsouhyun thecommunityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT leongjudy thecommunityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT hasselllaurie thecommunityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT kolindak thecommunityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT ramirezmagaly communityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT wooljenny communityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT bishopsonia communityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT harahubbardkeliannek communityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT jangsouhyun communityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT leongjudy communityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT hasselllaurie communityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness
AT kolindak communityvoicesprogramtofacilitatecommunityacademicresearcherpartnershipsstakeholderperspectivesontheprogramsusefulness