Cargando…

Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED

IMPORTANCE: Clinical decision support (CDS) could help emergency department (ED) physicians treat patients with heart failure (HF) by estimating risk, collating relevant history, and assisting with medication prescribing if physicians’ perspectives inform its design and implementation. OBJECTIVE: To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casey, Scott D., Reed, Mary E., LeMaster, Chris, Mark, Dustin G., Gaskin, Jesse, Norris, Robert P., Sax, Dana R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10663967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37988076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44393
_version_ 1785148689742823424
author Casey, Scott D.
Reed, Mary E.
LeMaster, Chris
Mark, Dustin G.
Gaskin, Jesse
Norris, Robert P.
Sax, Dana R.
author_facet Casey, Scott D.
Reed, Mary E.
LeMaster, Chris
Mark, Dustin G.
Gaskin, Jesse
Norris, Robert P.
Sax, Dana R.
author_sort Casey, Scott D.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Clinical decision support (CDS) could help emergency department (ED) physicians treat patients with heart failure (HF) by estimating risk, collating relevant history, and assisting with medication prescribing if physicians’ perspectives inform its design and implementation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate CDS usability and workflow integration in the hands of ED physician end users who use it in clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods qualitative study administered semistructured interviews to ED physicians from 2 community EDs of Kaiser Permanente Northern California in 2023. The interview guide, based on the Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design and the Sociotechnical Environment models, yielded themes used to construct an electronic survey instrument sent to all ED physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes were physicians’ perceptions of using CDS to complement clinical decision-making, usability, and integration into ED clinical workflow. RESULTS: Seven key informant physicians (5 [71.4%] female, median [IQR] 15.0 [9.5-15.0] years in practice) were interviewed and survey responses from 51 physicians (23 [45.1%] female, median [IQR] 14.0 [9.5-17.0] years in practice) were received from EDs piloting the CDS intervention. Response rate was 67.1% (51 of 76). Physicians suggested changes to CDS accessibility, functionality, and workflow integration. Most agreed that CDS would improve patient care and fewer than half of physicians expressed hesitation about their capacity to consistently comply with its recommendations, citing workload concerns. Physicians preferred a passive prompt that encouraged, but did not mandate, interaction with the CDS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this qualitative study of physicians who were using a novel CDS intervention to assist with ED management of patients with acute HF, several opportunities were identified to improve usability as well as several key barriers and facilitators to CDS implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10663967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106639672023-11-21 Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED Casey, Scott D. Reed, Mary E. LeMaster, Chris Mark, Dustin G. Gaskin, Jesse Norris, Robert P. Sax, Dana R. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Clinical decision support (CDS) could help emergency department (ED) physicians treat patients with heart failure (HF) by estimating risk, collating relevant history, and assisting with medication prescribing if physicians’ perspectives inform its design and implementation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate CDS usability and workflow integration in the hands of ED physician end users who use it in clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods qualitative study administered semistructured interviews to ED physicians from 2 community EDs of Kaiser Permanente Northern California in 2023. The interview guide, based on the Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design and the Sociotechnical Environment models, yielded themes used to construct an electronic survey instrument sent to all ED physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes were physicians’ perceptions of using CDS to complement clinical decision-making, usability, and integration into ED clinical workflow. RESULTS: Seven key informant physicians (5 [71.4%] female, median [IQR] 15.0 [9.5-15.0] years in practice) were interviewed and survey responses from 51 physicians (23 [45.1%] female, median [IQR] 14.0 [9.5-17.0] years in practice) were received from EDs piloting the CDS intervention. Response rate was 67.1% (51 of 76). Physicians suggested changes to CDS accessibility, functionality, and workflow integration. Most agreed that CDS would improve patient care and fewer than half of physicians expressed hesitation about their capacity to consistently comply with its recommendations, citing workload concerns. Physicians preferred a passive prompt that encouraged, but did not mandate, interaction with the CDS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this qualitative study of physicians who were using a novel CDS intervention to assist with ED management of patients with acute HF, several opportunities were identified to improve usability as well as several key barriers and facilitators to CDS implementation. American Medical Association 2023-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10663967/ /pubmed/37988076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44393 Text en Copyright 2023 Casey SD et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Casey, Scott D.
Reed, Mary E.
LeMaster, Chris
Mark, Dustin G.
Gaskin, Jesse
Norris, Robert P.
Sax, Dana R.
Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED
title Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED
title_full Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED
title_fullStr Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED
title_full_unstemmed Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED
title_short Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED
title_sort physicians’ perceptions of clinical decision support to treat patients with heart failure in the ed
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10663967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37988076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44393
work_keys_str_mv AT caseyscottd physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed
AT reedmarye physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed
AT lemasterchris physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed
AT markdusting physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed
AT gaskinjesse physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed
AT norrisrobertp physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed
AT saxdanar physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed