Cargando…
Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED
IMPORTANCE: Clinical decision support (CDS) could help emergency department (ED) physicians treat patients with heart failure (HF) by estimating risk, collating relevant history, and assisting with medication prescribing if physicians’ perspectives inform its design and implementation. OBJECTIVE: To...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10663967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37988076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44393 |
_version_ | 1785148689742823424 |
---|---|
author | Casey, Scott D. Reed, Mary E. LeMaster, Chris Mark, Dustin G. Gaskin, Jesse Norris, Robert P. Sax, Dana R. |
author_facet | Casey, Scott D. Reed, Mary E. LeMaster, Chris Mark, Dustin G. Gaskin, Jesse Norris, Robert P. Sax, Dana R. |
author_sort | Casey, Scott D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Clinical decision support (CDS) could help emergency department (ED) physicians treat patients with heart failure (HF) by estimating risk, collating relevant history, and assisting with medication prescribing if physicians’ perspectives inform its design and implementation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate CDS usability and workflow integration in the hands of ED physician end users who use it in clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods qualitative study administered semistructured interviews to ED physicians from 2 community EDs of Kaiser Permanente Northern California in 2023. The interview guide, based on the Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design and the Sociotechnical Environment models, yielded themes used to construct an electronic survey instrument sent to all ED physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes were physicians’ perceptions of using CDS to complement clinical decision-making, usability, and integration into ED clinical workflow. RESULTS: Seven key informant physicians (5 [71.4%] female, median [IQR] 15.0 [9.5-15.0] years in practice) were interviewed and survey responses from 51 physicians (23 [45.1%] female, median [IQR] 14.0 [9.5-17.0] years in practice) were received from EDs piloting the CDS intervention. Response rate was 67.1% (51 of 76). Physicians suggested changes to CDS accessibility, functionality, and workflow integration. Most agreed that CDS would improve patient care and fewer than half of physicians expressed hesitation about their capacity to consistently comply with its recommendations, citing workload concerns. Physicians preferred a passive prompt that encouraged, but did not mandate, interaction with the CDS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this qualitative study of physicians who were using a novel CDS intervention to assist with ED management of patients with acute HF, several opportunities were identified to improve usability as well as several key barriers and facilitators to CDS implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10663967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106639672023-11-21 Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED Casey, Scott D. Reed, Mary E. LeMaster, Chris Mark, Dustin G. Gaskin, Jesse Norris, Robert P. Sax, Dana R. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Clinical decision support (CDS) could help emergency department (ED) physicians treat patients with heart failure (HF) by estimating risk, collating relevant history, and assisting with medication prescribing if physicians’ perspectives inform its design and implementation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate CDS usability and workflow integration in the hands of ED physician end users who use it in clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods qualitative study administered semistructured interviews to ED physicians from 2 community EDs of Kaiser Permanente Northern California in 2023. The interview guide, based on the Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design and the Sociotechnical Environment models, yielded themes used to construct an electronic survey instrument sent to all ED physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes were physicians’ perceptions of using CDS to complement clinical decision-making, usability, and integration into ED clinical workflow. RESULTS: Seven key informant physicians (5 [71.4%] female, median [IQR] 15.0 [9.5-15.0] years in practice) were interviewed and survey responses from 51 physicians (23 [45.1%] female, median [IQR] 14.0 [9.5-17.0] years in practice) were received from EDs piloting the CDS intervention. Response rate was 67.1% (51 of 76). Physicians suggested changes to CDS accessibility, functionality, and workflow integration. Most agreed that CDS would improve patient care and fewer than half of physicians expressed hesitation about their capacity to consistently comply with its recommendations, citing workload concerns. Physicians preferred a passive prompt that encouraged, but did not mandate, interaction with the CDS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this qualitative study of physicians who were using a novel CDS intervention to assist with ED management of patients with acute HF, several opportunities were identified to improve usability as well as several key barriers and facilitators to CDS implementation. American Medical Association 2023-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10663967/ /pubmed/37988076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44393 Text en Copyright 2023 Casey SD et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Casey, Scott D. Reed, Mary E. LeMaster, Chris Mark, Dustin G. Gaskin, Jesse Norris, Robert P. Sax, Dana R. Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED |
title | Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED |
title_full | Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED |
title_fullStr | Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED |
title_full_unstemmed | Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED |
title_short | Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Decision Support to Treat Patients With Heart Failure in the ED |
title_sort | physicians’ perceptions of clinical decision support to treat patients with heart failure in the ed |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10663967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37988076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44393 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caseyscottd physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed AT reedmarye physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed AT lemasterchris physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed AT markdusting physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed AT gaskinjesse physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed AT norrisrobertp physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed AT saxdanar physiciansperceptionsofclinicaldecisionsupporttotreatpatientswithheartfailureintheed |