Cargando…

Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility for postmenopausal women of a bone-strengthening jumping intervention, which has been previously successful for premenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine participants (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age = 57.8 ± 4.3 years)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Forsyth, Jacky J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38029036
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_27_23
_version_ 1785138535977713664
author Forsyth, Jacky J.
author_facet Forsyth, Jacky J.
author_sort Forsyth, Jacky J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility for postmenopausal women of a bone-strengthening jumping intervention, which has been previously successful for premenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine participants (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age = 57.8 ± 4.3 years) were randomized into either an exercise intervention or sham-control group in a double-blinded fashion. The intervention consisted of 10 maximal, rest-inserted countermovement jumps, performed three times a week on a hard surface without shoes for 8 months. Sham-control participants performed unilateral balance exercises of equivalent duration. RESULTS: The jumps were well tolerated, with women in the jumping group completing 95% of the prescribed exercise. Of the participants who completed the study (n = 23 intervention, n = 16 control), there were no significant differences in broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the calcaneum within and between groups (mean ± SD BUA = 64.9 ± 7.3 and 66.6 ± 6.5 dB/MHz for intervention pre- and post-trial, respectively, versus mean ± SD BUA = 63.6 ± 4.2 and 64.4 ± 4.5 dB/MHz for sham-controls pre- and post-trial, respectively) or for any QUS parameters, although there was a 3% increase in BUA for intervention participants. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment and participation rates were feasible for this duration of study and the exercise was acceptable. For a future study of this nature, 48 participants would be required to ensure adequate power, especially as lifestyle variations and post-menopausal hypoestrogenism prevent substantial gains in bone strength with high-impact exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10664055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106640552023-04-01 Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Study Forsyth, Jacky J. J Midlife Health Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the feasibility for postmenopausal women of a bone-strengthening jumping intervention, which has been previously successful for premenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine participants (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age = 57.8 ± 4.3 years) were randomized into either an exercise intervention or sham-control group in a double-blinded fashion. The intervention consisted of 10 maximal, rest-inserted countermovement jumps, performed three times a week on a hard surface without shoes for 8 months. Sham-control participants performed unilateral balance exercises of equivalent duration. RESULTS: The jumps were well tolerated, with women in the jumping group completing 95% of the prescribed exercise. Of the participants who completed the study (n = 23 intervention, n = 16 control), there were no significant differences in broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the calcaneum within and between groups (mean ± SD BUA = 64.9 ± 7.3 and 66.6 ± 6.5 dB/MHz for intervention pre- and post-trial, respectively, versus mean ± SD BUA = 63.6 ± 4.2 and 64.4 ± 4.5 dB/MHz for sham-controls pre- and post-trial, respectively) or for any QUS parameters, although there was a 3% increase in BUA for intervention participants. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment and participation rates were feasible for this duration of study and the exercise was acceptable. For a future study of this nature, 48 participants would be required to ensure adequate power, especially as lifestyle variations and post-menopausal hypoestrogenism prevent substantial gains in bone strength with high-impact exercise. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10664055/ /pubmed/38029036 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_27_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Mid-life Health https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Forsyth, Jacky J.
Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Study
title Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_short Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort menopause osteoporosis and bone intervention using lifestyle exercise: a randomized controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38029036
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_27_23
work_keys_str_mv AT forsythjackyj menopauseosteoporosisandboneinterventionusinglifestyleexercisearandomizedcontrolledstudy