Cargando…

Hosting the Tobacco Industry Supply Chain and Political Interference

INTRODUCTION: We found no comprehensive studies on the location of transnational tobacco and leaf company (TTLC) subsidiaries (business entities they control) or the consequences of their presence on health policy. AIMS AND METHODS: Here we assess (1) the global reach of TTLCs by mapping their tobac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiscock, Rosemary, Alaouie, Hala, Matthes, Britta K, Mehegan, John, Bloomfield, Michael J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37707978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntad178
_version_ 1785138541291896832
author Hiscock, Rosemary
Alaouie, Hala
Matthes, Britta K
Mehegan, John
Bloomfield, Michael J
author_facet Hiscock, Rosemary
Alaouie, Hala
Matthes, Britta K
Mehegan, John
Bloomfield, Michael J
author_sort Hiscock, Rosemary
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We found no comprehensive studies on the location of transnational tobacco and leaf company (TTLC) subsidiaries (business entities they control) or the consequences of their presence on health policy. AIMS AND METHODS: Here we assess (1) the global reach of TTLCs by mapping their tobacco growing and manufacturing subsidiaries and (2) the relationship between in-country presence of the tobacco industry and their power and interference. Data on subsidiaries were collated through systematic searching for countries’ supply chain activities in documents and web pages. Cross-sectional multiple regression analysis was used to assess the association between the number of agricultural and manufacturing TTLCs and the Tobacco Industry Interference score, and the degree to which these were mediated by tobacco control, good governance, and economic importance of tobacco. RESULTS: TTLC supply chain activity had global reach. As the number of TTLCs with tobacco growing and manufacturing activities rose, interference increased significantly. Interference was associated with poorer tobacco control. The association with more TTLCs undertaking final product manufacturing was related to higher-value tobacco exports but was not related to tobacco making a bigger contribution to the economy. CONCLUSIONS: TTLCs continue to control the global tobacco supply chain through their globe-spanning subsidiaries. The presence of TTLCs in a country is associated with political interference. Countries should consider their participation in the tobacco supply chain alongside the understanding that they are likely to cede political power to TTLCs, potentially undermining the health of their populations. IMPLICATIONS: Tobacco control research has traditionally concentrated on the demand side of tobacco. Our results lend support to calls for more research on the supply of tobacco. Governments should require tobacco companies to provide detailed, up-to-date information in an easily accessible format on in-country supply chain activities. Policymakers should take the likelihood of political interference in health and environmental policy into account when making decisions about foreign direct investment offered by the tobacco industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10664082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106640822023-09-14 Hosting the Tobacco Industry Supply Chain and Political Interference Hiscock, Rosemary Alaouie, Hala Matthes, Britta K Mehegan, John Bloomfield, Michael J Nicotine Tob Res Original Investigations INTRODUCTION: We found no comprehensive studies on the location of transnational tobacco and leaf company (TTLC) subsidiaries (business entities they control) or the consequences of their presence on health policy. AIMS AND METHODS: Here we assess (1) the global reach of TTLCs by mapping their tobacco growing and manufacturing subsidiaries and (2) the relationship between in-country presence of the tobacco industry and their power and interference. Data on subsidiaries were collated through systematic searching for countries’ supply chain activities in documents and web pages. Cross-sectional multiple regression analysis was used to assess the association between the number of agricultural and manufacturing TTLCs and the Tobacco Industry Interference score, and the degree to which these were mediated by tobacco control, good governance, and economic importance of tobacco. RESULTS: TTLC supply chain activity had global reach. As the number of TTLCs with tobacco growing and manufacturing activities rose, interference increased significantly. Interference was associated with poorer tobacco control. The association with more TTLCs undertaking final product manufacturing was related to higher-value tobacco exports but was not related to tobacco making a bigger contribution to the economy. CONCLUSIONS: TTLCs continue to control the global tobacco supply chain through their globe-spanning subsidiaries. The presence of TTLCs in a country is associated with political interference. Countries should consider their participation in the tobacco supply chain alongside the understanding that they are likely to cede political power to TTLCs, potentially undermining the health of their populations. IMPLICATIONS: Tobacco control research has traditionally concentrated on the demand side of tobacco. Our results lend support to calls for more research on the supply of tobacco. Governments should require tobacco companies to provide detailed, up-to-date information in an easily accessible format on in-country supply chain activities. Policymakers should take the likelihood of political interference in health and environmental policy into account when making decisions about foreign direct investment offered by the tobacco industry. Oxford University Press 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10664082/ /pubmed/37707978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntad178 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Investigations
Hiscock, Rosemary
Alaouie, Hala
Matthes, Britta K
Mehegan, John
Bloomfield, Michael J
Hosting the Tobacco Industry Supply Chain and Political Interference
title Hosting the Tobacco Industry Supply Chain and Political Interference
title_full Hosting the Tobacco Industry Supply Chain and Political Interference
title_fullStr Hosting the Tobacco Industry Supply Chain and Political Interference
title_full_unstemmed Hosting the Tobacco Industry Supply Chain and Political Interference
title_short Hosting the Tobacco Industry Supply Chain and Political Interference
title_sort hosting the tobacco industry supply chain and political interference
topic Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37707978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntad178
work_keys_str_mv AT hiscockrosemary hostingthetobaccoindustrysupplychainandpoliticalinterference
AT alaouiehala hostingthetobaccoindustrysupplychainandpoliticalinterference
AT matthesbrittak hostingthetobaccoindustrysupplychainandpoliticalinterference
AT meheganjohn hostingthetobaccoindustrysupplychainandpoliticalinterference
AT bloomfieldmichaelj hostingthetobaccoindustrysupplychainandpoliticalinterference