Cargando…

Evaluating local primary health care actions to address health inequities: analysis of Australia’s Primary Health Networks

BACKGROUND: Meso-level, regional primary health care organisations such as Australia’s Primary Health Networks (PHNs) are well placed to address health inequities through comprehensive primary health care approaches. This study aimed to examine the equity actions of PHNs and identify factors that hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Windle, Alice, Javanparast, Sara, Freeman, Toby, Baum, Fran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-02053-8
_version_ 1785148707577004032
author Windle, Alice
Javanparast, Sara
Freeman, Toby
Baum, Fran
author_facet Windle, Alice
Javanparast, Sara
Freeman, Toby
Baum, Fran
author_sort Windle, Alice
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meso-level, regional primary health care organisations such as Australia’s Primary Health Networks (PHNs) are well placed to address health inequities through comprehensive primary health care approaches. This study aimed to examine the equity actions of PHNs and identify factors that hinder or enable the equity-orientation of PHNs’ activities. METHODS: Analysis of all 31 PHNs’ public planning documents. Case studies with a sample of five PHNs, drawing on 29 original interviews with key stakeholders, secondary analysis of 38 prior interviews, and analysis of 30 internal planning guidance documents. This study employed an existing framework to examine equity actions. RESULTS: PHNs displayed clear intentions and goals for health equity and collected considerable evidence of health inequities. However, their planned activities were largely restricted to individualistic clinical and behavioural approaches, with little to facilitate access to other health and social services, or act on the broader social determinants of health. PHNs’ equity-oriented planning was enabled by organisational values for equity, evidence of local health inequities, and engagement with local stakeholders. Equity-oriented planning was hindered by federal government constraints and lack of equity-oriented prompts in the planning process. CONCLUSIONS: PHNs’ equity actions were limited. To optimise regional planning for health equity, primary health care organisations need autonomy and scope to act on the ‘upstream’ factors that contribute to local health issues. They also need sufficient time and resources for robust, systematic planning processes that incorporate mechanisms such as procedure guides and tools/templates, to capitalise on their local evidence to address health inequities. Organisations should engage meaningfully with local communities and service providers, to ensure approaches are equity sensitive and appropriately targeted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10664268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106642682023-11-21 Evaluating local primary health care actions to address health inequities: analysis of Australia’s Primary Health Networks Windle, Alice Javanparast, Sara Freeman, Toby Baum, Fran Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Meso-level, regional primary health care organisations such as Australia’s Primary Health Networks (PHNs) are well placed to address health inequities through comprehensive primary health care approaches. This study aimed to examine the equity actions of PHNs and identify factors that hinder or enable the equity-orientation of PHNs’ activities. METHODS: Analysis of all 31 PHNs’ public planning documents. Case studies with a sample of five PHNs, drawing on 29 original interviews with key stakeholders, secondary analysis of 38 prior interviews, and analysis of 30 internal planning guidance documents. This study employed an existing framework to examine equity actions. RESULTS: PHNs displayed clear intentions and goals for health equity and collected considerable evidence of health inequities. However, their planned activities were largely restricted to individualistic clinical and behavioural approaches, with little to facilitate access to other health and social services, or act on the broader social determinants of health. PHNs’ equity-oriented planning was enabled by organisational values for equity, evidence of local health inequities, and engagement with local stakeholders. Equity-oriented planning was hindered by federal government constraints and lack of equity-oriented prompts in the planning process. CONCLUSIONS: PHNs’ equity actions were limited. To optimise regional planning for health equity, primary health care organisations need autonomy and scope to act on the ‘upstream’ factors that contribute to local health issues. They also need sufficient time and resources for robust, systematic planning processes that incorporate mechanisms such as procedure guides and tools/templates, to capitalise on their local evidence to address health inequities. Organisations should engage meaningfully with local communities and service providers, to ensure approaches are equity sensitive and appropriately targeted. BioMed Central 2023-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10664268/ /pubmed/37990326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-02053-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Windle, Alice
Javanparast, Sara
Freeman, Toby
Baum, Fran
Evaluating local primary health care actions to address health inequities: analysis of Australia’s Primary Health Networks
title Evaluating local primary health care actions to address health inequities: analysis of Australia’s Primary Health Networks
title_full Evaluating local primary health care actions to address health inequities: analysis of Australia’s Primary Health Networks
title_fullStr Evaluating local primary health care actions to address health inequities: analysis of Australia’s Primary Health Networks
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating local primary health care actions to address health inequities: analysis of Australia’s Primary Health Networks
title_short Evaluating local primary health care actions to address health inequities: analysis of Australia’s Primary Health Networks
title_sort evaluating local primary health care actions to address health inequities: analysis of australia’s primary health networks
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-02053-8
work_keys_str_mv AT windlealice evaluatinglocalprimaryhealthcareactionstoaddresshealthinequitiesanalysisofaustraliasprimaryhealthnetworks
AT javanparastsara evaluatinglocalprimaryhealthcareactionstoaddresshealthinequitiesanalysisofaustraliasprimaryhealthnetworks
AT freemantoby evaluatinglocalprimaryhealthcareactionstoaddresshealthinequitiesanalysisofaustraliasprimaryhealthnetworks
AT baumfran evaluatinglocalprimaryhealthcareactionstoaddresshealthinequitiesanalysisofaustraliasprimaryhealthnetworks