Cargando…

National assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care

OBJECTIVE: To examine family medicine (FM) and obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy (CP) group prenatal care (GPNC) as a correlate to perceived likelihood of implementing CP in future practice, as well as knowledge, level of support, and perceived barrier...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Place, Jean Marie, Van De Griend, Kristin, Zhang, Mengxi, Schreiner, Melanie, Munroe, Tanya, Crockett, Amy, Ji, Wenyan, Hanlon, Alexandra L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06124-0
_version_ 1785148713787719680
author Place, Jean Marie
Van De Griend, Kristin
Zhang, Mengxi
Schreiner, Melanie
Munroe, Tanya
Crockett, Amy
Ji, Wenyan
Hanlon, Alexandra L.
author_facet Place, Jean Marie
Van De Griend, Kristin
Zhang, Mengxi
Schreiner, Melanie
Munroe, Tanya
Crockett, Amy
Ji, Wenyan
Hanlon, Alexandra L.
author_sort Place, Jean Marie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine family medicine (FM) and obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy (CP) group prenatal care (GPNC) as a correlate to perceived likelihood of implementing CP in future practice, as well as knowledge, level of support, and perceived barriers to implementation. METHODS: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study annually from 2017 to 2019 with FM and OB/GYN residents from residency programs in the United States licensed to operate CP. We applied adjusted logistic regression models to identify predictors of intentions to engage with CP in future practice. RESULTS: Of 212 FM and 176 OB/GYN residents included in analysis, 67.01% of respondents intended to participate as a facilitator in CP in future practice and 51.80% of respondents were willing to talk to decision makers about establishing CP. Both FM and OB/GYN residents who spent more than 15 h engaged with CP and who expressed support towards CP were more likely to participate as a facilitator. FM residents who received residency-based training on CP and who were more familiar with CP reported higher intention to participate as a facilitator, while OB/GYN residents who had higher levels of engagement with CP were more likely to report an intention to participate as a facilitator. CONCLUSION: Engagement with and support towards CP during residency are key factors in residents’ intention to practice CP in the future. To encourage future adoption of CP among residents, consider maximizing resident engagement with the model in hours of exposure and level of engagement, including hosting residency-based trainings on CP for FM residents. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-023-06124-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10664296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106642962023-11-21 National assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care Place, Jean Marie Van De Griend, Kristin Zhang, Mengxi Schreiner, Melanie Munroe, Tanya Crockett, Amy Ji, Wenyan Hanlon, Alexandra L. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research OBJECTIVE: To examine family medicine (FM) and obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy (CP) group prenatal care (GPNC) as a correlate to perceived likelihood of implementing CP in future practice, as well as knowledge, level of support, and perceived barriers to implementation. METHODS: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study annually from 2017 to 2019 with FM and OB/GYN residents from residency programs in the United States licensed to operate CP. We applied adjusted logistic regression models to identify predictors of intentions to engage with CP in future practice. RESULTS: Of 212 FM and 176 OB/GYN residents included in analysis, 67.01% of respondents intended to participate as a facilitator in CP in future practice and 51.80% of respondents were willing to talk to decision makers about establishing CP. Both FM and OB/GYN residents who spent more than 15 h engaged with CP and who expressed support towards CP were more likely to participate as a facilitator. FM residents who received residency-based training on CP and who were more familiar with CP reported higher intention to participate as a facilitator, while OB/GYN residents who had higher levels of engagement with CP were more likely to report an intention to participate as a facilitator. CONCLUSION: Engagement with and support towards CP during residency are key factors in residents’ intention to practice CP in the future. To encourage future adoption of CP among residents, consider maximizing resident engagement with the model in hours of exposure and level of engagement, including hosting residency-based trainings on CP for FM residents. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-023-06124-0. BioMed Central 2023-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10664296/ /pubmed/37990297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06124-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Place, Jean Marie
Van De Griend, Kristin
Zhang, Mengxi
Schreiner, Melanie
Munroe, Tanya
Crockett, Amy
Ji, Wenyan
Hanlon, Alexandra L.
National assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care
title National assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care
title_full National assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care
title_fullStr National assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care
title_full_unstemmed National assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care
title_short National assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care
title_sort national assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents’ experiences with centeringpregnancy group prenatal care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06124-0
work_keys_str_mv AT placejeanmarie nationalassessmentofobstetricsandgynecologyandfamilymedicineresidentsexperienceswithcenteringpregnancygroupprenatalcare
AT vandegriendkristin nationalassessmentofobstetricsandgynecologyandfamilymedicineresidentsexperienceswithcenteringpregnancygroupprenatalcare
AT zhangmengxi nationalassessmentofobstetricsandgynecologyandfamilymedicineresidentsexperienceswithcenteringpregnancygroupprenatalcare
AT schreinermelanie nationalassessmentofobstetricsandgynecologyandfamilymedicineresidentsexperienceswithcenteringpregnancygroupprenatalcare
AT munroetanya nationalassessmentofobstetricsandgynecologyandfamilymedicineresidentsexperienceswithcenteringpregnancygroupprenatalcare
AT crockettamy nationalassessmentofobstetricsandgynecologyandfamilymedicineresidentsexperienceswithcenteringpregnancygroupprenatalcare
AT jiwenyan nationalassessmentofobstetricsandgynecologyandfamilymedicineresidentsexperienceswithcenteringpregnancygroupprenatalcare
AT hanlonalexandral nationalassessmentofobstetricsandgynecologyandfamilymedicineresidentsexperienceswithcenteringpregnancygroupprenatalcare