Cargando…

Evaluation of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with proximal caries- a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Modern management of dental caries should be more conservative and include early detection of lesions and active surveillance, in order to apply preventive measures and carefully monitor for signs of arrest or progression. Proximal slicing was suggested for nonrestorative caries treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fux-Noy, Avia, Goldberg, Tamar, Shmueli, Aviv, Halperson, Elinor, Ram, Diana, Davidovich, Esti, Moskovitz, Moti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03648-x
_version_ 1785148716663963648
author Fux-Noy, Avia
Goldberg, Tamar
Shmueli, Aviv
Halperson, Elinor
Ram, Diana
Davidovich, Esti
Moskovitz, Moti
author_facet Fux-Noy, Avia
Goldberg, Tamar
Shmueli, Aviv
Halperson, Elinor
Ram, Diana
Davidovich, Esti
Moskovitz, Moti
author_sort Fux-Noy, Avia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modern management of dental caries should be more conservative and include early detection of lesions and active surveillance, in order to apply preventive measures and carefully monitor for signs of arrest or progression. Proximal slicing was suggested for nonrestorative caries treatment for primary incisors. The aim of the study was to examine the success of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors in arresting caries progression. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from medical records of patients who had undergone proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with a follow-up period of at least 6 months. Treatment was considered a success when no further invasive clinical intervention was required within the follow-up period of at least 6 months. Treatment was considered a failure when further invasive clinical intervention was needed during the follow-up period (restoration, crown, or extraction). Additional variables included were the patient’s gender, treated tooth, treated surface, age during their first visit to the clinic, age during slicing treatment, follow-up period, number of follow-up visits, and number of fluoride applications and additional slicing during follow-up. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included in the study. Proximal slicing was successful in 76% of participants with a follow-up of at least 6 months. Success was associated with older age at the first dental visit (3.5yo vs. 2.5yo, p = 0.0011) and age when proximal slicing was performed (4yo vs. 3yo, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Proximal slicing may successfully arrest proximal caries in primary maxillary incisors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10664308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106643082023-11-21 Evaluation of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with proximal caries- a retrospective cohort study Fux-Noy, Avia Goldberg, Tamar Shmueli, Aviv Halperson, Elinor Ram, Diana Davidovich, Esti Moskovitz, Moti BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Modern management of dental caries should be more conservative and include early detection of lesions and active surveillance, in order to apply preventive measures and carefully monitor for signs of arrest or progression. Proximal slicing was suggested for nonrestorative caries treatment for primary incisors. The aim of the study was to examine the success of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors in arresting caries progression. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from medical records of patients who had undergone proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with a follow-up period of at least 6 months. Treatment was considered a success when no further invasive clinical intervention was required within the follow-up period of at least 6 months. Treatment was considered a failure when further invasive clinical intervention was needed during the follow-up period (restoration, crown, or extraction). Additional variables included were the patient’s gender, treated tooth, treated surface, age during their first visit to the clinic, age during slicing treatment, follow-up period, number of follow-up visits, and number of fluoride applications and additional slicing during follow-up. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included in the study. Proximal slicing was successful in 76% of participants with a follow-up of at least 6 months. Success was associated with older age at the first dental visit (3.5yo vs. 2.5yo, p = 0.0011) and age when proximal slicing was performed (4yo vs. 3yo, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Proximal slicing may successfully arrest proximal caries in primary maxillary incisors. BioMed Central 2023-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10664308/ /pubmed/37990222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03648-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fux-Noy, Avia
Goldberg, Tamar
Shmueli, Aviv
Halperson, Elinor
Ram, Diana
Davidovich, Esti
Moskovitz, Moti
Evaluation of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with proximal caries- a retrospective cohort study
title Evaluation of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with proximal caries- a retrospective cohort study
title_full Evaluation of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with proximal caries- a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Evaluation of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with proximal caries- a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with proximal caries- a retrospective cohort study
title_short Evaluation of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with proximal caries- a retrospective cohort study
title_sort evaluation of proximal slicing in primary maxillary incisors with proximal caries- a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03648-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fuxnoyavia evaluationofproximalslicinginprimarymaxillaryincisorswithproximalcariesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT goldbergtamar evaluationofproximalslicinginprimarymaxillaryincisorswithproximalcariesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shmueliaviv evaluationofproximalslicinginprimarymaxillaryincisorswithproximalcariesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT halpersonelinor evaluationofproximalslicinginprimarymaxillaryincisorswithproximalcariesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ramdiana evaluationofproximalslicinginprimarymaxillaryincisorswithproximalcariesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT davidovichesti evaluationofproximalslicinginprimarymaxillaryincisorswithproximalcariesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT moskovitzmoti evaluationofproximalslicinginprimarymaxillaryincisorswithproximalcariesaretrospectivecohortstudy