Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of aflibercept and ranibizumab in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration with retinal pigment epithelial detachment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with retinal pigment epithelial detachment (PED). METHODS: Systematic review identifying studies comparing intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR), intravitreal aflibe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Zuhua, Yang, Yating, Lin, Bing, Huang, Ying, Zhou, Rong, Yang, Chun, Li, Yingzi, Huang, Shenghai, Liu, Xiaoling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37990182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03214-7
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with retinal pigment epithelial detachment (PED). METHODS: Systematic review identifying studies comparing intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR), intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and intravitreal conbercept (IVC) published before Mar 2022. RESULTS: One randomized controlled trial and 6 observational studies were selected for meta-analysis (1,069 patients). The change of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in IVA 2.0 mg group was better than IVR 0.5 mg (average difference 0.07) and IVR 2.0 mg (average difference 0.10), the differences were statistically significant. The change of the height of PED in IVA 2.0 group was better than IVR 0.5 group (average difference 45.30), the difference was statistically significant. The proportion of patients without PED at last visit in IVA 2.0 group were better than those in IVR 2.0 group (hazard ratio 1.91), the difference was statistically significant. There was no significant difference compared with IVR 0.5 group (hazard ratio 1.45). IVA required fewer injections than IVR, with a mean difference of -1.58. CONCLUSIONS: IVA appears to be superior to IVR in improvement of BCVA, height decrease of PED and regression of PED with less injections in nAMD with PED. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-03214-7.