Cargando…

Comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Northern Alberta

BACKGROUND: Internationally, Indigenous Peoples experience worse surgical outcomes than non-Indigenous patients, but equity of surgical care is less well studied in Canada. This study compares outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients. METHODS: In this population-ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsiao, Ralph, Youngson, Erik, Lafontaine, Alika, Fathimani, Kamran, Williams, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37967970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.011222
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Internationally, Indigenous Peoples experience worse surgical outcomes than non-Indigenous patients, but equity of surgical care is less well studied in Canada. This study compares outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients. METHODS: In this population-based study, we reviewed administrative data of patients who underwent appendectomy between Apr. 1, 2004, and Mar. 31, 2017, in Northern Alberta. Demographic variables and characteristics of surgical care for First Nations and non–First Nations patients were collected. We identified adverse outcomes by the presence of predefined administrative codes. We identified variables related to a complex postoperative course (at least 1 of wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, abscess, bowel obstruction, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, emergency department visit, readmission or death within 30 d after appendectomy) through a logistic regression model, and those related to longer length of stay using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 28 453 patients met the selection criteria, of whom 1737 (6.1%) had First Nations status. Compared to non–First Nations patients, First Nations patients were younger, lived farther away from the hospital of their appendectomy, were in lower socioeconomic quintiles, and had higher rates of obesity and diabetes (all p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, distance to hospital, socioeconomic deprivation and comorbidities, First Nations status remained independently associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes (odds ratio 1.548, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.384–1.733) and longer lengths of stay (hazard ratio 0.877, 95% CI 0.832–0.924). CONCLUSION: Although rurality, comorbidities and socioeconomic status contributed to worse outcomes after appendectomy for First Nations patients, First Nations status remained independently associated with worse surgical outcomes. Surgical care, an integral component of health care delivery, must be improved for First Nations patients in order to achieve equitable health care.