Cargando…

Comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Northern Alberta

BACKGROUND: Internationally, Indigenous Peoples experience worse surgical outcomes than non-Indigenous patients, but equity of surgical care is less well studied in Canada. This study compares outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients. METHODS: In this population-ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsiao, Ralph, Youngson, Erik, Lafontaine, Alika, Fathimani, Kamran, Williams, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37967970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.011222
_version_ 1785148794705281024
author Hsiao, Ralph
Youngson, Erik
Lafontaine, Alika
Fathimani, Kamran
Williams, David C.
author_facet Hsiao, Ralph
Youngson, Erik
Lafontaine, Alika
Fathimani, Kamran
Williams, David C.
author_sort Hsiao, Ralph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Internationally, Indigenous Peoples experience worse surgical outcomes than non-Indigenous patients, but equity of surgical care is less well studied in Canada. This study compares outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients. METHODS: In this population-based study, we reviewed administrative data of patients who underwent appendectomy between Apr. 1, 2004, and Mar. 31, 2017, in Northern Alberta. Demographic variables and characteristics of surgical care for First Nations and non–First Nations patients were collected. We identified adverse outcomes by the presence of predefined administrative codes. We identified variables related to a complex postoperative course (at least 1 of wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, abscess, bowel obstruction, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, emergency department visit, readmission or death within 30 d after appendectomy) through a logistic regression model, and those related to longer length of stay using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 28 453 patients met the selection criteria, of whom 1737 (6.1%) had First Nations status. Compared to non–First Nations patients, First Nations patients were younger, lived farther away from the hospital of their appendectomy, were in lower socioeconomic quintiles, and had higher rates of obesity and diabetes (all p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, distance to hospital, socioeconomic deprivation and comorbidities, First Nations status remained independently associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes (odds ratio 1.548, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.384–1.733) and longer lengths of stay (hazard ratio 0.877, 95% CI 0.832–0.924). CONCLUSION: Although rurality, comorbidities and socioeconomic status contributed to worse outcomes after appendectomy for First Nations patients, First Nations status remained independently associated with worse surgical outcomes. Surgical care, an integral component of health care delivery, must be improved for First Nations patients in order to achieve equitable health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10664803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106648032023-11-15 Comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Northern Alberta Hsiao, Ralph Youngson, Erik Lafontaine, Alika Fathimani, Kamran Williams, David C. Can J Surg Research BACKGROUND: Internationally, Indigenous Peoples experience worse surgical outcomes than non-Indigenous patients, but equity of surgical care is less well studied in Canada. This study compares outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients. METHODS: In this population-based study, we reviewed administrative data of patients who underwent appendectomy between Apr. 1, 2004, and Mar. 31, 2017, in Northern Alberta. Demographic variables and characteristics of surgical care for First Nations and non–First Nations patients were collected. We identified adverse outcomes by the presence of predefined administrative codes. We identified variables related to a complex postoperative course (at least 1 of wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, abscess, bowel obstruction, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, emergency department visit, readmission or death within 30 d after appendectomy) through a logistic regression model, and those related to longer length of stay using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 28 453 patients met the selection criteria, of whom 1737 (6.1%) had First Nations status. Compared to non–First Nations patients, First Nations patients were younger, lived farther away from the hospital of their appendectomy, were in lower socioeconomic quintiles, and had higher rates of obesity and diabetes (all p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, distance to hospital, socioeconomic deprivation and comorbidities, First Nations status remained independently associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes (odds ratio 1.548, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.384–1.733) and longer lengths of stay (hazard ratio 0.877, 95% CI 0.832–0.924). CONCLUSION: Although rurality, comorbidities and socioeconomic status contributed to worse outcomes after appendectomy for First Nations patients, First Nations status remained independently associated with worse surgical outcomes. Surgical care, an integral component of health care delivery, must be improved for First Nations patients in order to achieve equitable health care. CMA Impact Inc. 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10664803/ /pubmed/37967970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.011222 Text en © 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Hsiao, Ralph
Youngson, Erik
Lafontaine, Alika
Fathimani, Kamran
Williams, David C.
Comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Northern Alberta
title Comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Northern Alberta
title_full Comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Northern Alberta
title_fullStr Comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Northern Alberta
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Northern Alberta
title_short Comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in First Nations and non–First Nations patients in Northern Alberta
title_sort comparison of outcomes after appendectomy in first nations and non–first nations patients in northern alberta
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37967970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.011222
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiaoralph comparisonofoutcomesafterappendectomyinfirstnationsandnonfirstnationspatientsinnorthernalberta
AT youngsonerik comparisonofoutcomesafterappendectomyinfirstnationsandnonfirstnationspatientsinnorthernalberta
AT lafontainealika comparisonofoutcomesafterappendectomyinfirstnationsandnonfirstnationspatientsinnorthernalberta
AT fathimanikamran comparisonofoutcomesafterappendectomyinfirstnationsandnonfirstnationspatientsinnorthernalberta
AT williamsdavidc comparisonofoutcomesafterappendectomyinfirstnationsandnonfirstnationspatientsinnorthernalberta