Cargando…

Uncertainty in the association between socio-demographic characteristics and mental health

Questionnaires are among the most basic and widespread tools to assess the mental health of a population in epidemiological and public health studies. Their most obvious advantage (firsthand self-report) is also the source of their main problems: the raw data requires interpretation, and are a snaps...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rybnikova, Nataliya, Broitman, Dani, Mary-Krause, Murielle, Melchior, Maria, Ben-Haim, Yakov
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37992122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294664
_version_ 1785148809085452288
author Rybnikova, Nataliya
Broitman, Dani
Mary-Krause, Murielle
Melchior, Maria
Ben-Haim, Yakov
author_facet Rybnikova, Nataliya
Broitman, Dani
Mary-Krause, Murielle
Melchior, Maria
Ben-Haim, Yakov
author_sort Rybnikova, Nataliya
collection PubMed
description Questionnaires are among the most basic and widespread tools to assess the mental health of a population in epidemiological and public health studies. Their most obvious advantage (firsthand self-report) is also the source of their main problems: the raw data requires interpretation, and are a snapshot of the specific sample’s status at a given time. Efforts to deal with both issues created a bi-dimensional space defined by two orthogonal axes, in which most of the quantitative mental health research can be located. Methods aimed to assure that mental health diagnoses are solidly grounded on existing raw data are part of the individual validity axis. Tools allowing the generalization of the results across the entire population compose the collective validity axis. This paper raises a different question. Since one goal of mental health assessments is to obtain results that can be generalized to some extent, an important question is how robust is a questionnaire result when applied to a different population or to the same population at a different time. In this case, there is deep uncertainty, without any a priori probabilistic information. The main claim of this paper is that this task requires the development of a new robustness to deep uncertainty axis, defining a three-dimensional research space. We demonstrate the analysis of deep uncertainty using the concept of robustness in info-gap decision theory. Based on data from questionnaires collected before and during the Covid-19 pandemic, we first locate a mental health assessment in the space defined by the individual validity axis and the collective validity axis. Then we develop a model of info-gap robustness to uncertainty in mental health assessment, showing how the robustness to deep uncertainty axis interacts with the other two axes, highlighting the contributions and the limitations of this approach. The ability to measure robustness to deep uncertainty in the mental health realm is important particularly in troubled and changing times. In this paper, we provide the basic methodological building blocks of the suggested approach using the outbreak of Covid-19 as a recent example.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10664908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106649082023-11-22 Uncertainty in the association between socio-demographic characteristics and mental health Rybnikova, Nataliya Broitman, Dani Mary-Krause, Murielle Melchior, Maria Ben-Haim, Yakov PLoS One Research Article Questionnaires are among the most basic and widespread tools to assess the mental health of a population in epidemiological and public health studies. Their most obvious advantage (firsthand self-report) is also the source of their main problems: the raw data requires interpretation, and are a snapshot of the specific sample’s status at a given time. Efforts to deal with both issues created a bi-dimensional space defined by two orthogonal axes, in which most of the quantitative mental health research can be located. Methods aimed to assure that mental health diagnoses are solidly grounded on existing raw data are part of the individual validity axis. Tools allowing the generalization of the results across the entire population compose the collective validity axis. This paper raises a different question. Since one goal of mental health assessments is to obtain results that can be generalized to some extent, an important question is how robust is a questionnaire result when applied to a different population or to the same population at a different time. In this case, there is deep uncertainty, without any a priori probabilistic information. The main claim of this paper is that this task requires the development of a new robustness to deep uncertainty axis, defining a three-dimensional research space. We demonstrate the analysis of deep uncertainty using the concept of robustness in info-gap decision theory. Based on data from questionnaires collected before and during the Covid-19 pandemic, we first locate a mental health assessment in the space defined by the individual validity axis and the collective validity axis. Then we develop a model of info-gap robustness to uncertainty in mental health assessment, showing how the robustness to deep uncertainty axis interacts with the other two axes, highlighting the contributions and the limitations of this approach. The ability to measure robustness to deep uncertainty in the mental health realm is important particularly in troubled and changing times. In this paper, we provide the basic methodological building blocks of the suggested approach using the outbreak of Covid-19 as a recent example. Public Library of Science 2023-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10664908/ /pubmed/37992122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294664 Text en © 2023 Rybnikova et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rybnikova, Nataliya
Broitman, Dani
Mary-Krause, Murielle
Melchior, Maria
Ben-Haim, Yakov
Uncertainty in the association between socio-demographic characteristics and mental health
title Uncertainty in the association between socio-demographic characteristics and mental health
title_full Uncertainty in the association between socio-demographic characteristics and mental health
title_fullStr Uncertainty in the association between socio-demographic characteristics and mental health
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty in the association between socio-demographic characteristics and mental health
title_short Uncertainty in the association between socio-demographic characteristics and mental health
title_sort uncertainty in the association between socio-demographic characteristics and mental health
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37992122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294664
work_keys_str_mv AT rybnikovanataliya uncertaintyintheassociationbetweensociodemographiccharacteristicsandmentalhealth
AT broitmandani uncertaintyintheassociationbetweensociodemographiccharacteristicsandmentalhealth
AT marykrausemurielle uncertaintyintheassociationbetweensociodemographiccharacteristicsandmentalhealth
AT melchiormaria uncertaintyintheassociationbetweensociodemographiccharacteristicsandmentalhealth
AT benhaimyakov uncertaintyintheassociationbetweensociodemographiccharacteristicsandmentalhealth