Cargando…
Impact of In-house Candida auris Polymerase Chain Reaction Screening on Admission on the Incidence Rates of Surveillance and Blood Cultures With C. auris and Associated Cost Savings
BACKGROUND: The impact of strategies for rapid diagnostic screening of Candida auris on hospital operations has not been previously characterized. We describe the implementation of in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on admission for screening of colonization with C. auris, associated p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad567 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The impact of strategies for rapid diagnostic screening of Candida auris on hospital operations has not been previously characterized. We describe the implementation of in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on admission for screening of colonization with C. auris, associated process improvements, and financial impact. METHODS: This study was conducted across an integrated health system. Patients were tested based on risk factors for C. auris carriage. Pre-intervention, the PCR was sent out to a reference laboratory, and postintervention was performed in-house. Changes in the incidence rates (IRs) of C. auris present on admission (CA-POA) and C. auris hospital-onset fungemia (CA-HOF) were assessed using interrupted time series analysis. The economic impact on isolation and testing costs was calculated. RESULTS: Postintervention, the IR of CA-POA doubled (IRR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.16–5.69; P = .02) compared with the pre-intervention period. The baseline rate of CA-HOF was increasing monthly by 14% (95% CI, 1.05–1.24; P = .002) pre-intervention, while during the postintervention period there was a change in slope with a monthly decrease in IR of 13% (95% CI, 0.80–0.99; P = .02). The median turnaround time (TAT) of the results (interquartile range) was reduced from 11 (8–14) days to 2 (1–3) days. Savings were estimated to be between $772 513.10 and $3 730 480.26. CONCLUSIONS: By performing in-house PCR for screening of C. auris colonization on admission, we found a doubling of CA-POA rates, a subsequent decrease in CA-HOF rates, reduced TAT for PCR results, and more efficient use of infection control measures. In-house testing was cost-effective in a setting of relatively high prevalence among individuals with known risk factors. |
---|