Cargando…

Feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 95 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection and skin bridge loop ileostomy between August...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiang, Shang, Huang, Shujuan, Ye, Hui, Lu, Wei, Zeng, Xiangsheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023201
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1273499
_version_ 1785138752865173504
author Xiang, Shang
Huang, Shujuan
Ye, Hui
Lu, Wei
Zeng, Xiangsheng
author_facet Xiang, Shang
Huang, Shujuan
Ye, Hui
Lu, Wei
Zeng, Xiangsheng
author_sort Xiang, Shang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 95 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection and skin bridge loop ileostomy between August 2018 and August 2022, including 44 patients with specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy (experimental group) and 51 patients with specimen extraction via an abdominal incision (control group). Following the application of propensity score matching (PSM), 34 pairs of data were successfully matched. Subsequently, a comparative analysis was conducted on the clinical data of the two groups. RESULTS: The experimental group exhibited significantly better outcomes than the control group in various aspects. Specifically, the experimental group had lower values for average operative time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), median length of visible incision after surgery (P < 0.001), median VAS pain score on the first day after surgery (P = 0.015), and average postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.001). There was no statistical significance observed in the incidence of stoma-related complications in both groups (P > 0.05). Within each group, the stoma-QOL scores before stoma closure surgery were significantly higher than those at one month and two months after the surgery, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Specimen extraction via a U-Plus skin bridge loop ileostomy is a safe and feasible method that shortens operation time and postoperative visual incision length, decreases estimated blood loss, and reduces patient postoperative pain compared with specimen extraction via an abdominal incision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10665085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106650852023-01-01 Feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study Xiang, Shang Huang, Shujuan Ye, Hui Lu, Wei Zeng, Xiangsheng Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 95 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection and skin bridge loop ileostomy between August 2018 and August 2022, including 44 patients with specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy (experimental group) and 51 patients with specimen extraction via an abdominal incision (control group). Following the application of propensity score matching (PSM), 34 pairs of data were successfully matched. Subsequently, a comparative analysis was conducted on the clinical data of the two groups. RESULTS: The experimental group exhibited significantly better outcomes than the control group in various aspects. Specifically, the experimental group had lower values for average operative time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), median length of visible incision after surgery (P < 0.001), median VAS pain score on the first day after surgery (P = 0.015), and average postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.001). There was no statistical significance observed in the incidence of stoma-related complications in both groups (P > 0.05). Within each group, the stoma-QOL scores before stoma closure surgery were significantly higher than those at one month and two months after the surgery, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Specimen extraction via a U-Plus skin bridge loop ileostomy is a safe and feasible method that shortens operation time and postoperative visual incision length, decreases estimated blood loss, and reduces patient postoperative pain compared with specimen extraction via an abdominal incision. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10665085/ /pubmed/38023201 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1273499 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xiang, Huang, Ye, Lu and Zeng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xiang, Shang
Huang, Shujuan
Ye, Hui
Lu, Wei
Zeng, Xiangsheng
Feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study
title Feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study
title_full Feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study
title_fullStr Feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study
title_short Feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (U-Plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study
title_sort feasibility and safety of specimen extraction via an enlarged (u-plus) skin bridge loop ileostomy: a single-center retrospective comparative study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023201
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1273499
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangshang feasibilityandsafetyofspecimenextractionviaanenlargeduplusskinbridgeloopileostomyasinglecenterretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT huangshujuan feasibilityandsafetyofspecimenextractionviaanenlargeduplusskinbridgeloopileostomyasinglecenterretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT yehui feasibilityandsafetyofspecimenextractionviaanenlargeduplusskinbridgeloopileostomyasinglecenterretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT luwei feasibilityandsafetyofspecimenextractionviaanenlargeduplusskinbridgeloopileostomyasinglecenterretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT zengxiangsheng feasibilityandsafetyofspecimenextractionviaanenlargeduplusskinbridgeloopileostomyasinglecenterretrospectivecomparativestudy