Cargando…

How farm practices and antibiotic use drive disease incidence in smallholder livestock farms: Evidence from a survey in Uganda

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat to human and animal health, and the growth in AMR prevalence globally is thought to be partially driven by non-therapeutic antibiotic use in livestock production. However, livestock farms may depend on antibiotics as a prophylactic disea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emes, Eve, Wieland, Barbara, Magnusson, Ulf, Dione, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100627
_version_ 1785138767646949376
author Emes, Eve
Wieland, Barbara
Magnusson, Ulf
Dione, Michel
author_facet Emes, Eve
Wieland, Barbara
Magnusson, Ulf
Dione, Michel
author_sort Emes, Eve
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat to human and animal health, and the growth in AMR prevalence globally is thought to be partially driven by non-therapeutic antibiotic use in livestock production. However, livestock farms may depend on antibiotics as a prophylactic disease management tool, and reducing antibiotic use in isolation may harm farmers' economic security. In order to help farmers safely reduce their antibiotic use, we must first determine how necessary non-therapeutic antibiotic use is for disease management, and how other farm practices can guard against disease and make antibiotic use reduction safe and feasible. METHODS: Using the Antimicrobial Use in Livestock Production Settings (AMUSE) tool, a standardised survey tool for investigating attitudes and practices relating to antibiotic use on farms, we investigated the farming practices and animal disease outcomes of smallholder livestock farms in Uganda. We used logistic regression to investigate the effect of prophylactic antibiotic use; as well as of prophylactic vaccination, non-antimicrobial medicines, and on-farm biosecurity measures; on the likelihood of disease outbreaks. FINDINGS: We found that prophylactic antibiotic use did indeed seem to guard against disease outbreaks, underlining the rationality of non-therapeutic antibiotic use in smallholder livestock farms and the need to pair antibiotic use reduction with other interventions in order to mitigate risk. The most effective intervention pairing varied by species, with expanded access to animal health services and the use of prophylactic vaccination demonstrating the greatest potential overall. IMPLICATIONS: These findings echo earlier results generated using the AMUSE survey tool. They should be followed by participatory research in which farmers are consulted to explore intervention options, and subsequently by farm-level intervention trials of combined antimicrobial stewardship interventions to verify their effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10665161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106651612023-09-14 How farm practices and antibiotic use drive disease incidence in smallholder livestock farms: Evidence from a survey in Uganda Emes, Eve Wieland, Barbara Magnusson, Ulf Dione, Michel One Health Research Paper BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing threat to human and animal health, and the growth in AMR prevalence globally is thought to be partially driven by non-therapeutic antibiotic use in livestock production. However, livestock farms may depend on antibiotics as a prophylactic disease management tool, and reducing antibiotic use in isolation may harm farmers' economic security. In order to help farmers safely reduce their antibiotic use, we must first determine how necessary non-therapeutic antibiotic use is for disease management, and how other farm practices can guard against disease and make antibiotic use reduction safe and feasible. METHODS: Using the Antimicrobial Use in Livestock Production Settings (AMUSE) tool, a standardised survey tool for investigating attitudes and practices relating to antibiotic use on farms, we investigated the farming practices and animal disease outcomes of smallholder livestock farms in Uganda. We used logistic regression to investigate the effect of prophylactic antibiotic use; as well as of prophylactic vaccination, non-antimicrobial medicines, and on-farm biosecurity measures; on the likelihood of disease outbreaks. FINDINGS: We found that prophylactic antibiotic use did indeed seem to guard against disease outbreaks, underlining the rationality of non-therapeutic antibiotic use in smallholder livestock farms and the need to pair antibiotic use reduction with other interventions in order to mitigate risk. The most effective intervention pairing varied by species, with expanded access to animal health services and the use of prophylactic vaccination demonstrating the greatest potential overall. IMPLICATIONS: These findings echo earlier results generated using the AMUSE survey tool. They should be followed by participatory research in which farmers are consulted to explore intervention options, and subsequently by farm-level intervention trials of combined antimicrobial stewardship interventions to verify their effectiveness. Elsevier 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10665161/ /pubmed/38024259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100627 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Emes, Eve
Wieland, Barbara
Magnusson, Ulf
Dione, Michel
How farm practices and antibiotic use drive disease incidence in smallholder livestock farms: Evidence from a survey in Uganda
title How farm practices and antibiotic use drive disease incidence in smallholder livestock farms: Evidence from a survey in Uganda
title_full How farm practices and antibiotic use drive disease incidence in smallholder livestock farms: Evidence from a survey in Uganda
title_fullStr How farm practices and antibiotic use drive disease incidence in smallholder livestock farms: Evidence from a survey in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed How farm practices and antibiotic use drive disease incidence in smallholder livestock farms: Evidence from a survey in Uganda
title_short How farm practices and antibiotic use drive disease incidence in smallholder livestock farms: Evidence from a survey in Uganda
title_sort how farm practices and antibiotic use drive disease incidence in smallholder livestock farms: evidence from a survey in uganda
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100627
work_keys_str_mv AT emeseve howfarmpracticesandantibioticusedrivediseaseincidenceinsmallholderlivestockfarmsevidencefromasurveyinuganda
AT wielandbarbara howfarmpracticesandantibioticusedrivediseaseincidenceinsmallholderlivestockfarmsevidencefromasurveyinuganda
AT magnussonulf howfarmpracticesandantibioticusedrivediseaseincidenceinsmallholderlivestockfarmsevidencefromasurveyinuganda
AT dionemichel howfarmpracticesandantibioticusedrivediseaseincidenceinsmallholderlivestockfarmsevidencefromasurveyinuganda