Cargando…

Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough?

INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis is a common cardiac condition, with significant mortality. Blood culture-negative endocarditis is an important subgroup of endocarditis that holds significant morbidity and mortality. METHOD: We performed an updated review of the literature. We searched the datab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirk, Frazer, Vaselli, Natasha Marcella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37792178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02097-6
_version_ 1785138780849569792
author Kirk, Frazer
Vaselli, Natasha Marcella
author_facet Kirk, Frazer
Vaselli, Natasha Marcella
author_sort Kirk, Frazer
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis is a common cardiac condition, with significant mortality. Blood culture-negative endocarditis is an important subgroup of endocarditis that holds significant morbidity and mortality. METHOD: We performed an updated review of the literature. We searched the databases of Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBAS and Scopus for the latest clinical guidelines and literature on blood culture negative endocarditis to provide a narrative synthesis of the literature. RESULTS: There is significant heterogeneity in causes and complications of culture-negative infective endocarditis, due to an insensitivity in available clinical diagnostic pathways. Despite significant advances in diagnostic tools, the diagnostic criterion for infective endocarditis (the modified Duke’s criterion) remains insensitive to the detection of culture-negative infective endocarditis. CONCLUSION: The natural history of BCNE and our diagnostic resources are changing. It is time our criterion did too. Remembering, BCNE holds significant morbidity and mortality—the absence of organism of culture should not reassure, rather concern clinicians. Every effort should be made to accurately identify organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10665218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106652182023-10-04 Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough? Kirk, Frazer Vaselli, Natasha Marcella Infection Review INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis is a common cardiac condition, with significant mortality. Blood culture-negative endocarditis is an important subgroup of endocarditis that holds significant morbidity and mortality. METHOD: We performed an updated review of the literature. We searched the databases of Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBAS and Scopus for the latest clinical guidelines and literature on blood culture negative endocarditis to provide a narrative synthesis of the literature. RESULTS: There is significant heterogeneity in causes and complications of culture-negative infective endocarditis, due to an insensitivity in available clinical diagnostic pathways. Despite significant advances in diagnostic tools, the diagnostic criterion for infective endocarditis (the modified Duke’s criterion) remains insensitive to the detection of culture-negative infective endocarditis. CONCLUSION: The natural history of BCNE and our diagnostic resources are changing. It is time our criterion did too. Remembering, BCNE holds significant morbidity and mortality—the absence of organism of culture should not reassure, rather concern clinicians. Every effort should be made to accurately identify organisms. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-10-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10665218/ /pubmed/37792178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02097-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Kirk, Frazer
Vaselli, Natasha Marcella
Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough?
title Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough?
title_full Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough?
title_fullStr Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough?
title_full_unstemmed Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough?
title_short Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough?
title_sort blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37792178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02097-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kirkfrazer bloodculturenegativeinfectiveendocarditisarewelookinghardenough
AT vasellinatashamarcella bloodculturenegativeinfectiveendocarditisarewelookinghardenough