Cargando…
Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough?
INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis is a common cardiac condition, with significant mortality. Blood culture-negative endocarditis is an important subgroup of endocarditis that holds significant morbidity and mortality. METHOD: We performed an updated review of the literature. We searched the datab...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37792178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02097-6 |
_version_ | 1785138780849569792 |
---|---|
author | Kirk, Frazer Vaselli, Natasha Marcella |
author_facet | Kirk, Frazer Vaselli, Natasha Marcella |
author_sort | Kirk, Frazer |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis is a common cardiac condition, with significant mortality. Blood culture-negative endocarditis is an important subgroup of endocarditis that holds significant morbidity and mortality. METHOD: We performed an updated review of the literature. We searched the databases of Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBAS and Scopus for the latest clinical guidelines and literature on blood culture negative endocarditis to provide a narrative synthesis of the literature. RESULTS: There is significant heterogeneity in causes and complications of culture-negative infective endocarditis, due to an insensitivity in available clinical diagnostic pathways. Despite significant advances in diagnostic tools, the diagnostic criterion for infective endocarditis (the modified Duke’s criterion) remains insensitive to the detection of culture-negative infective endocarditis. CONCLUSION: The natural history of BCNE and our diagnostic resources are changing. It is time our criterion did too. Remembering, BCNE holds significant morbidity and mortality—the absence of organism of culture should not reassure, rather concern clinicians. Every effort should be made to accurately identify organisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10665218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106652182023-10-04 Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough? Kirk, Frazer Vaselli, Natasha Marcella Infection Review INTRODUCTION: Infective endocarditis is a common cardiac condition, with significant mortality. Blood culture-negative endocarditis is an important subgroup of endocarditis that holds significant morbidity and mortality. METHOD: We performed an updated review of the literature. We searched the databases of Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBAS and Scopus for the latest clinical guidelines and literature on blood culture negative endocarditis to provide a narrative synthesis of the literature. RESULTS: There is significant heterogeneity in causes and complications of culture-negative infective endocarditis, due to an insensitivity in available clinical diagnostic pathways. Despite significant advances in diagnostic tools, the diagnostic criterion for infective endocarditis (the modified Duke’s criterion) remains insensitive to the detection of culture-negative infective endocarditis. CONCLUSION: The natural history of BCNE and our diagnostic resources are changing. It is time our criterion did too. Remembering, BCNE holds significant morbidity and mortality—the absence of organism of culture should not reassure, rather concern clinicians. Every effort should be made to accurately identify organisms. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-10-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10665218/ /pubmed/37792178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02097-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Kirk, Frazer Vaselli, Natasha Marcella Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough? |
title | Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough? |
title_full | Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough? |
title_fullStr | Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough? |
title_full_unstemmed | Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough? |
title_short | Blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough? |
title_sort | blood culture-negative infective endocarditis: are we looking hard enough? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37792178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-023-02097-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirkfrazer bloodculturenegativeinfectiveendocarditisarewelookinghardenough AT vasellinatashamarcella bloodculturenegativeinfectiveendocarditisarewelookinghardenough |