Cargando…

Genetic sexing of subadult skeletal remains

When subadult skeletons need to be identified, biological sex diagnosis is one of the first steps in the identification process. Sex assessment of subadults using morphological features is unreliable, and molecular genetic methods were applied in this study. Eighty-three ancient skeletons were used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zupanič Pajnič, Irena, Mlinšek, Teo, Počivavšek, Tadej, Leskovar, Tamara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37993531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47836-9
_version_ 1785148876872744960
author Zupanič Pajnič, Irena
Mlinšek, Teo
Počivavšek, Tadej
Leskovar, Tamara
author_facet Zupanič Pajnič, Irena
Mlinšek, Teo
Počivavšek, Tadej
Leskovar, Tamara
author_sort Zupanič Pajnič, Irena
collection PubMed
description When subadult skeletons need to be identified, biological sex diagnosis is one of the first steps in the identification process. Sex assessment of subadults using morphological features is unreliable, and molecular genetic methods were applied in this study. Eighty-three ancient skeletons were used as models for poorly preserved DNA. Three sex-informative markers on the Y and X chromosome were used for sex identification: a qPCR test using the PowerQuant Y target included in PowerQuant System (Promega), the amelogenin test included in ESI 17 Fast STR kit (Promega), and a Y-STR amplification test using the PowerPlex Y-23 kit (Promega). Sex was successfully determined in all but five skeletons. Successful PowerQuant Y-target, Y-amelogenin, and Y-chromosomal STR amplifications proved the presence of male DNA in 35 skeletons, and in 43 subadults female sex was established. No match was found between the genetic profiles of subadult skeletons, and the elimination database and negative control samples produced no profiles, indicating no contamination issue. Our study shows that genetic sex identification is a very successful approach for biological sexing of subadult skeletons whose sex cannot be assessed by anthropological methods. The results of this study are applicable for badly preserved subadult skeletons from routine forensic casework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10665466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106654662023-11-22 Genetic sexing of subadult skeletal remains Zupanič Pajnič, Irena Mlinšek, Teo Počivavšek, Tadej Leskovar, Tamara Sci Rep Article When subadult skeletons need to be identified, biological sex diagnosis is one of the first steps in the identification process. Sex assessment of subadults using morphological features is unreliable, and molecular genetic methods were applied in this study. Eighty-three ancient skeletons were used as models for poorly preserved DNA. Three sex-informative markers on the Y and X chromosome were used for sex identification: a qPCR test using the PowerQuant Y target included in PowerQuant System (Promega), the amelogenin test included in ESI 17 Fast STR kit (Promega), and a Y-STR amplification test using the PowerPlex Y-23 kit (Promega). Sex was successfully determined in all but five skeletons. Successful PowerQuant Y-target, Y-amelogenin, and Y-chromosomal STR amplifications proved the presence of male DNA in 35 skeletons, and in 43 subadults female sex was established. No match was found between the genetic profiles of subadult skeletons, and the elimination database and negative control samples produced no profiles, indicating no contamination issue. Our study shows that genetic sex identification is a very successful approach for biological sexing of subadult skeletons whose sex cannot be assessed by anthropological methods. The results of this study are applicable for badly preserved subadult skeletons from routine forensic casework. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10665466/ /pubmed/37993531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47836-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zupanič Pajnič, Irena
Mlinšek, Teo
Počivavšek, Tadej
Leskovar, Tamara
Genetic sexing of subadult skeletal remains
title Genetic sexing of subadult skeletal remains
title_full Genetic sexing of subadult skeletal remains
title_fullStr Genetic sexing of subadult skeletal remains
title_full_unstemmed Genetic sexing of subadult skeletal remains
title_short Genetic sexing of subadult skeletal remains
title_sort genetic sexing of subadult skeletal remains
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37993531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47836-9
work_keys_str_mv AT zupanicpajnicirena geneticsexingofsubadultskeletalremains
AT mlinsekteo geneticsexingofsubadultskeletalremains
AT pocivavsektadej geneticsexingofsubadultskeletalremains
AT leskovartamara geneticsexingofsubadultskeletalremains