Effectiveness of Flat-Panel Fluoroscopy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison to Image Intensifier Fluoroscopy With Radiopaque Grid

INTRODUCTION: The use of traditional, image intensifier fluoroscopy with a radiopaque grid during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty (DA THA) has demonstrated reduced variability in component positioning and operative time compared to fluoroscopy without a grid. A disadvantage of image intensifier fluoroscopy is spatial distortion, particularly compared to flat-panel fluoroscopy systems. The purpose of this study is to determine whether flat-panel fluoroscopy decreases variability in component positioning during DA THA compared to the use of traditional grid fluoroscopy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 70 consecutive DA THAs between February 2020 and February 2021: 36 using flat-panel fluoroscopy, and 34 using traditional fluoroscopy with a grid. Radiographs were independently reviewed by 2 authors to identify components exceeding goal parameters: cup abduction of 40 ± 10 degrees, as well as offset and limb lengths within 10 mm of the contralateral side. Binary values for goal parameter achievement were assigned for each THA. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the number of hips that met goals for cup abduction (100% vs 97%, P = 1.00), hip offset (88% vs 88%, P = 1.00), limb length (91% vs 94% [ ±10 mm], P = .669, 65% vs 72% [±5 mm], P = .498), or for the number of hips that met all 3 component goals (79% vs 80%, P = 1.00). No significant difference in operative time was noted between the 2 groups (110.2 minutes vs 100.9, P = .76). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated no significant difference in component positioning in DA THAs utilizing flat-panel fluoroscopy as compared to using traditional fluoroscopy with a grid.