Cargando…

Alpha-lipoic acid does not improve olfactory training results in olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a double-blind randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: Olfactory loss is a recognized long-term dysfunction after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. This investigation aimed to assess the effect of alpha-lipoic acid as an adjuvant treatment of olfactory training on the improvement of smell loss in post-COVID-19 patients. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Figueiredo, Lorena Pinheiro, Paim, Paulo Victor dos Santos Lima, Cerqueira-Silva, Thiago, Barreto, Carolina Cincurá, Lessa, Marcus Miranda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37944311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101356
_version_ 1785138879133646848
author Figueiredo, Lorena Pinheiro
Paim, Paulo Victor dos Santos Lima
Cerqueira-Silva, Thiago
Barreto, Carolina Cincurá
Lessa, Marcus Miranda
author_facet Figueiredo, Lorena Pinheiro
Paim, Paulo Victor dos Santos Lima
Cerqueira-Silva, Thiago
Barreto, Carolina Cincurá
Lessa, Marcus Miranda
author_sort Figueiredo, Lorena Pinheiro
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Olfactory loss is a recognized long-term dysfunction after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. This investigation aimed to assess the effect of alpha-lipoic acid as an adjuvant treatment of olfactory training on the improvement of smell loss in post-COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included 128 adult outpatients who had persistent smell loss for more than 3-months after COVID-19 infection. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the intervention treatment group, which received alpha-lipoic acid associated to olfactory training, and comparison treatment group, which received placebo pills associated to olfactory training. The participants were followed-up for 12-weeks. Olfactory dysfunction was assessed in terms of Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) test for the Brazilian population. RESULTS: A total of 100 participants completed the follow-up period and were analyzed in this study. Both groups have improved CCCRC score (p = 0.000), olfactory threshold (p = 0.000), identification score (p = 0.000) and VAS score (p = 0.000) after 12-weeks follow-up. No significant differences were determined between the intervention and comparison treatment groups in CCCRC score (p = 0.63), olfactory threshold (p = 0.50), identification score (p = 0.96) and VAS score (p = 0.97). In all these criteria, comparison treatment group went slightly worse. At the endpoint of the study, the frequency of anosmia reduced to 2% in the intervention treatment group and to 7.8% in the comparison treatment group. Also, 16.8% of the intervention group’ subjects, and 15.7% of comparison treatment group’s patients reached normosmia. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was a strongly significant difference in olfactory function between baseline and endpoint for both groups. However, based on the lack of significant difference between the intervention treatment and the comparison treatment groups in terms of olfactory changes, our study appoints that the alpha-lipoic acid is not better than olfactory training alone to treat olfactory loss after COVID-19. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10665681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106656812023-10-30 Alpha-lipoic acid does not improve olfactory training results in olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a double-blind randomized trial Figueiredo, Lorena Pinheiro Paim, Paulo Victor dos Santos Lima Cerqueira-Silva, Thiago Barreto, Carolina Cincurá Lessa, Marcus Miranda Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Olfactory loss is a recognized long-term dysfunction after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. This investigation aimed to assess the effect of alpha-lipoic acid as an adjuvant treatment of olfactory training on the improvement of smell loss in post-COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included 128 adult outpatients who had persistent smell loss for more than 3-months after COVID-19 infection. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the intervention treatment group, which received alpha-lipoic acid associated to olfactory training, and comparison treatment group, which received placebo pills associated to olfactory training. The participants were followed-up for 12-weeks. Olfactory dysfunction was assessed in terms of Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) test for the Brazilian population. RESULTS: A total of 100 participants completed the follow-up period and were analyzed in this study. Both groups have improved CCCRC score (p = 0.000), olfactory threshold (p = 0.000), identification score (p = 0.000) and VAS score (p = 0.000) after 12-weeks follow-up. No significant differences were determined between the intervention and comparison treatment groups in CCCRC score (p = 0.63), olfactory threshold (p = 0.50), identification score (p = 0.96) and VAS score (p = 0.97). In all these criteria, comparison treatment group went slightly worse. At the endpoint of the study, the frequency of anosmia reduced to 2% in the intervention treatment group and to 7.8% in the comparison treatment group. Also, 16.8% of the intervention group’ subjects, and 15.7% of comparison treatment group’s patients reached normosmia. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was a strongly significant difference in olfactory function between baseline and endpoint for both groups. However, based on the lack of significant difference between the intervention treatment and the comparison treatment groups in terms of olfactory changes, our study appoints that the alpha-lipoic acid is not better than olfactory training alone to treat olfactory loss after COVID-19. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. Elsevier 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10665681/ /pubmed/37944311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101356 Text en © 2023 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Figueiredo, Lorena Pinheiro
Paim, Paulo Victor dos Santos Lima
Cerqueira-Silva, Thiago
Barreto, Carolina Cincurá
Lessa, Marcus Miranda
Alpha-lipoic acid does not improve olfactory training results in olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a double-blind randomized trial
title Alpha-lipoic acid does not improve olfactory training results in olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a double-blind randomized trial
title_full Alpha-lipoic acid does not improve olfactory training results in olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a double-blind randomized trial
title_fullStr Alpha-lipoic acid does not improve olfactory training results in olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a double-blind randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Alpha-lipoic acid does not improve olfactory training results in olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a double-blind randomized trial
title_short Alpha-lipoic acid does not improve olfactory training results in olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a double-blind randomized trial
title_sort alpha-lipoic acid does not improve olfactory training results in olfactory loss due to covid-19: a double-blind randomized trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37944311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101356
work_keys_str_mv AT figueiredolorenapinheiro alphalipoicaciddoesnotimproveolfactorytrainingresultsinolfactorylossduetocovid19adoubleblindrandomizedtrial
AT paimpaulovictordossantoslima alphalipoicaciddoesnotimproveolfactorytrainingresultsinolfactorylossduetocovid19adoubleblindrandomizedtrial
AT cerqueirasilvathiago alphalipoicaciddoesnotimproveolfactorytrainingresultsinolfactorylossduetocovid19adoubleblindrandomizedtrial
AT barretocarolinacincura alphalipoicaciddoesnotimproveolfactorytrainingresultsinolfactorylossduetocovid19adoubleblindrandomizedtrial
AT lessamarcusmiranda alphalipoicaciddoesnotimproveolfactorytrainingresultsinolfactorylossduetocovid19adoubleblindrandomizedtrial