Cargando…
Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background: While vaccines were one of the most effective tools to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, breakthrough infections have been reported. Aim of the work: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines in preventing breakthrough infection, as well as to determine the poss...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021606 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47552 |
_version_ | 1785138897407180800 |
---|---|
author | Mohammed, Rehab A Baqais, Omar Basalib, Samaher G Owaidah, Abdulaziz A Mirza, Abdulrahman Alharizi, Randa M Sultan, Intessar |
author_facet | Mohammed, Rehab A Baqais, Omar Basalib, Samaher G Owaidah, Abdulaziz A Mirza, Abdulrahman Alharizi, Randa M Sultan, Intessar |
author_sort | Mohammed, Rehab A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: While vaccines were one of the most effective tools to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, breakthrough infections have been reported. Aim of the work: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines in preventing breakthrough infection, as well as to determine the possible risk factors and outcomes of post-vaccination infection. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using self-reported data of adult Saudi residents, including Saudi and non-Saudi people who received at least two doses of either Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccines. Based on the presence of COVID-19 symptoms that were confirmed by PCR, the participants were classified into three groups: (1) those with evidence of infection before vaccination, (2) those who had infection after vaccination, and (3) those who had infection before and after vaccination. For further evaluation, we compared the severity and outcomes in the participants who were infected before and after vaccination. Results: The study included 694 participants: 69.1% received three doses of the vaccine, and 71.1% of them were vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine. COVID-19 infection was reported in 48.3% of the total subjects, with a higher infection rate (17.8%) after vaccination compared to 12.5% before vaccination. Additionally, 18.32% of participants experienced infection both before and after vaccination. Out of the total 694 participants, 137 (19.7%) had breakthrough infections. Pfizer vaccine was more prevalent among the non-infected group (74.25% vs. 65.5%), while AstraZeneca vaccine was more prevalent among the infected group (6.4% vs. 5.9% (p<0.039). Diabetes was significantly higher among the infected group (16.9% vs. 8.1%, p=0.001, OR=2.29, 95% CI=1.42-3.68). Among those who were infected before and after vaccination, 71.9% reported less severe symptoms after vaccination. Conclusion: Breakthrough infections may occur after vaccination; however, vaccines are overall effective in preventing severe symptoms. Pfizer vaccine appeared to be more effective in preventing COVID-19 infection. The presence of comorbidities, including diabetes, may increase the risk of infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10665761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106657612023-10-23 Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study Mohammed, Rehab A Baqais, Omar Basalib, Samaher G Owaidah, Abdulaziz A Mirza, Abdulrahman Alharizi, Randa M Sultan, Intessar Cureus Internal Medicine Background: While vaccines were one of the most effective tools to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, breakthrough infections have been reported. Aim of the work: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines in preventing breakthrough infection, as well as to determine the possible risk factors and outcomes of post-vaccination infection. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using self-reported data of adult Saudi residents, including Saudi and non-Saudi people who received at least two doses of either Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccines. Based on the presence of COVID-19 symptoms that were confirmed by PCR, the participants were classified into three groups: (1) those with evidence of infection before vaccination, (2) those who had infection after vaccination, and (3) those who had infection before and after vaccination. For further evaluation, we compared the severity and outcomes in the participants who were infected before and after vaccination. Results: The study included 694 participants: 69.1% received three doses of the vaccine, and 71.1% of them were vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine. COVID-19 infection was reported in 48.3% of the total subjects, with a higher infection rate (17.8%) after vaccination compared to 12.5% before vaccination. Additionally, 18.32% of participants experienced infection both before and after vaccination. Out of the total 694 participants, 137 (19.7%) had breakthrough infections. Pfizer vaccine was more prevalent among the non-infected group (74.25% vs. 65.5%), while AstraZeneca vaccine was more prevalent among the infected group (6.4% vs. 5.9% (p<0.039). Diabetes was significantly higher among the infected group (16.9% vs. 8.1%, p=0.001, OR=2.29, 95% CI=1.42-3.68). Among those who were infected before and after vaccination, 71.9% reported less severe symptoms after vaccination. Conclusion: Breakthrough infections may occur after vaccination; however, vaccines are overall effective in preventing severe symptoms. Pfizer vaccine appeared to be more effective in preventing COVID-19 infection. The presence of comorbidities, including diabetes, may increase the risk of infection. Cureus 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10665761/ /pubmed/38021606 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47552 Text en Copyright © 2023, Mohammed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Internal Medicine Mohammed, Rehab A Baqais, Omar Basalib, Samaher G Owaidah, Abdulaziz A Mirza, Abdulrahman Alharizi, Randa M Sultan, Intessar Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | post-covid-19 vaccination infection among adults in saudi arabia: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Internal Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021606 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47552 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammedrehaba postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT baqaisomar postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT basalibsamaherg postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT owaidahabdulaziza postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT mirzaabdulrahman postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT alharizirandam postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT sultanintessar postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy |