Cargando…

Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: While vaccines were one of the most effective tools to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, breakthrough infections have been reported. Aim of the work: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines in preventing breakthrough infection, as well as to determine the poss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammed, Rehab A, Baqais, Omar, Basalib, Samaher G, Owaidah, Abdulaziz A, Mirza, Abdulrahman, Alharizi, Randa M, Sultan, Intessar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021606
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47552
_version_ 1785138897407180800
author Mohammed, Rehab A
Baqais, Omar
Basalib, Samaher G
Owaidah, Abdulaziz A
Mirza, Abdulrahman
Alharizi, Randa M
Sultan, Intessar
author_facet Mohammed, Rehab A
Baqais, Omar
Basalib, Samaher G
Owaidah, Abdulaziz A
Mirza, Abdulrahman
Alharizi, Randa M
Sultan, Intessar
author_sort Mohammed, Rehab A
collection PubMed
description Background: While vaccines were one of the most effective tools to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, breakthrough infections have been reported. Aim of the work: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines in preventing breakthrough infection, as well as to determine the possible risk factors and outcomes of post-vaccination infection. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using self-reported data of adult Saudi residents, including Saudi and non-Saudi people who received at least two doses of either Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccines. Based on the presence of COVID-19 symptoms that were confirmed by PCR, the participants were classified into three groups: (1) those with evidence of infection before vaccination, (2) those who had infection after vaccination, and (3) those who had infection before and after vaccination. For further evaluation, we compared the severity and outcomes in the participants who were infected before and after vaccination. Results: The study included 694 participants: 69.1% received three doses of the vaccine, and 71.1% of them were vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine. COVID-19 infection was reported in 48.3% of the total subjects, with a higher infection rate (17.8%) after vaccination compared to 12.5% before vaccination. Additionally, 18.32% of participants experienced infection both before and after vaccination. Out of the total 694 participants, 137 (19.7%) had breakthrough infections. Pfizer vaccine was more prevalent among the non-infected group (74.25% vs. 65.5%), while AstraZeneca vaccine was more prevalent among the infected group (6.4% vs. 5.9% (p<0.039). Diabetes was significantly higher among the infected group (16.9% vs. 8.1%, p=0.001, OR=2.29, 95% CI=1.42-3.68). Among those who were infected before and after vaccination, 71.9% reported less severe symptoms after vaccination. Conclusion: Breakthrough infections may occur after vaccination; however, vaccines are overall effective in preventing severe symptoms. Pfizer vaccine appeared to be more effective in preventing COVID-19 infection. The presence of comorbidities, including diabetes, may increase the risk of infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10665761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106657612023-10-23 Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study Mohammed, Rehab A Baqais, Omar Basalib, Samaher G Owaidah, Abdulaziz A Mirza, Abdulrahman Alharizi, Randa M Sultan, Intessar Cureus Internal Medicine Background: While vaccines were one of the most effective tools to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, breakthrough infections have been reported. Aim of the work: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines in preventing breakthrough infection, as well as to determine the possible risk factors and outcomes of post-vaccination infection. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using self-reported data of adult Saudi residents, including Saudi and non-Saudi people who received at least two doses of either Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccines. Based on the presence of COVID-19 symptoms that were confirmed by PCR, the participants were classified into three groups: (1) those with evidence of infection before vaccination, (2) those who had infection after vaccination, and (3) those who had infection before and after vaccination. For further evaluation, we compared the severity and outcomes in the participants who were infected before and after vaccination. Results: The study included 694 participants: 69.1% received three doses of the vaccine, and 71.1% of them were vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine. COVID-19 infection was reported in 48.3% of the total subjects, with a higher infection rate (17.8%) after vaccination compared to 12.5% before vaccination. Additionally, 18.32% of participants experienced infection both before and after vaccination. Out of the total 694 participants, 137 (19.7%) had breakthrough infections. Pfizer vaccine was more prevalent among the non-infected group (74.25% vs. 65.5%), while AstraZeneca vaccine was more prevalent among the infected group (6.4% vs. 5.9% (p<0.039). Diabetes was significantly higher among the infected group (16.9% vs. 8.1%, p=0.001, OR=2.29, 95% CI=1.42-3.68). Among those who were infected before and after vaccination, 71.9% reported less severe symptoms after vaccination. Conclusion: Breakthrough infections may occur after vaccination; however, vaccines are overall effective in preventing severe symptoms. Pfizer vaccine appeared to be more effective in preventing COVID-19 infection. The presence of comorbidities, including diabetes, may increase the risk of infection. Cureus 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10665761/ /pubmed/38021606 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47552 Text en Copyright © 2023, Mohammed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
Mohammed, Rehab A
Baqais, Omar
Basalib, Samaher G
Owaidah, Abdulaziz A
Mirza, Abdulrahman
Alharizi, Randa M
Sultan, Intessar
Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Post-COVID-19 Vaccination Infection Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort post-covid-19 vaccination infection among adults in saudi arabia: a cross-sectional study
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38021606
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47552
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedrehaba postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT baqaisomar postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT basalibsamaherg postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT owaidahabdulaziza postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT mirzaabdulrahman postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT alharizirandam postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT sultanintessar postcovid19vaccinationinfectionamongadultsinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy