Evaluation of pain levels treated by the distal end of the hook‐wire positioning needle: A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Severe pain can be expected among adult patients undergoing hook‐wire CT‐guided localization of pulmonary nodules. We compared varying pain degrees between two different treatment techniques. METHODS: Data from 100 patients who underwent hook‐wire puncture localization under preoperative CT between May 2022 and October 2022 were prospectively reviewed. Using the random number table method, the patients were assigned to an observation and control group in a 1:1 ratio. In the observation group (n = 50), the external part of the hook‐wire positioning needle was cut off; in the control group (n = 50), the external portion of the needle was bent. Static pain scores were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 30 min, 1, and 2 h post localization for patients. RESULTS: No significant differences were present between the two groups in terms of patient age, sex, nodule size, and nodule location. The observation group had lower VAS scores at 30 min (2.57 ± 1.38 vs. 3.51 ± 1.87 p = 0.005), 1 h (2.43 ± 1.14 vs. 3.33 ± 1.76 p = 0.003), and 2 h (2.41 ± 1.12 vs. 3.17 ± 1.74 p = 0.011) after localization. Moreover, the pain level did not gradually worsen in either group. Both groups had a 100% localization success rate. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.431) in the localized complication incidences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found both approaches for handling the hook‐wire extending outside the chest to be safe and effective. However, cutting off the hook‐wire extending outside the chest is associated with lesser pain. Moreover, pain severity does not worsen with time after localization.