Cargando…
The Status of Data Management Practices Across German Medical Data Integration Centers: Mixed Methods Study
BACKGROUND: In the context of the Medical Informatics Initiative, medical data integration centers (DICs) have implemented complex data flows to transfer routine health care data into research data repositories for secondary use. Data management practices are of importance throughout these processes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938878 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48809 |
_version_ | 1785138952666087424 |
---|---|
author | Gierend, Kerstin Freiesleben, Sherry Kadioglu, Dennis Siegel, Fabian Ganslandt, Thomas Waltemath, Dagmar |
author_facet | Gierend, Kerstin Freiesleben, Sherry Kadioglu, Dennis Siegel, Fabian Ganslandt, Thomas Waltemath, Dagmar |
author_sort | Gierend, Kerstin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the context of the Medical Informatics Initiative, medical data integration centers (DICs) have implemented complex data flows to transfer routine health care data into research data repositories for secondary use. Data management practices are of importance throughout these processes, and special attention should be given to provenance aspects. Insufficient knowledge can lead to validity risks and reduce the confidence and quality of the processed data. The need to implement maintainable data management practices is undisputed, but there is a great lack of clarity on the status. OBJECTIVE: Our study examines the current data management practices throughout the data life cycle within the Medical Informatics in Research and Care in University Medicine (MIRACUM) consortium. We present a framework for the maturity status of data management practices and present recommendations to enable a trustful dissemination and reuse of routine health care data. METHODS: In this mixed methods study, we conducted semistructured interviews with stakeholders from 10 DICs between July and September 2021. We used a self-designed questionnaire that we tailored to the MIRACUM DICs, to collect qualitative and quantitative data. Our study method is compliant with the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) checklist. RESULTS: Our study provides insights into the data management practices at the MIRACUM DICs. We identify several traceability issues that can be partially explained with a lack of contextual information within nonharmonized workflow steps, unclear responsibilities, missing or incomplete data elements, and incomplete information about the computational environment information. Based on the identified shortcomings, we suggest a data management maturity framework to reach more clarity and to help define enhanced data management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The data management maturity framework supports the production and dissemination of accurate and provenance-enriched data for secondary use. Our work serves as a catalyst for the derivation of an overarching data management strategy, abiding data integrity and provenance characteristics as key factors. We envision that this work will lead to the generation of fairer and maintained health research data of high quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10666010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106660102023-11-08 The Status of Data Management Practices Across German Medical Data Integration Centers: Mixed Methods Study Gierend, Kerstin Freiesleben, Sherry Kadioglu, Dennis Siegel, Fabian Ganslandt, Thomas Waltemath, Dagmar J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: In the context of the Medical Informatics Initiative, medical data integration centers (DICs) have implemented complex data flows to transfer routine health care data into research data repositories for secondary use. Data management practices are of importance throughout these processes, and special attention should be given to provenance aspects. Insufficient knowledge can lead to validity risks and reduce the confidence and quality of the processed data. The need to implement maintainable data management practices is undisputed, but there is a great lack of clarity on the status. OBJECTIVE: Our study examines the current data management practices throughout the data life cycle within the Medical Informatics in Research and Care in University Medicine (MIRACUM) consortium. We present a framework for the maturity status of data management practices and present recommendations to enable a trustful dissemination and reuse of routine health care data. METHODS: In this mixed methods study, we conducted semistructured interviews with stakeholders from 10 DICs between July and September 2021. We used a self-designed questionnaire that we tailored to the MIRACUM DICs, to collect qualitative and quantitative data. Our study method is compliant with the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) checklist. RESULTS: Our study provides insights into the data management practices at the MIRACUM DICs. We identify several traceability issues that can be partially explained with a lack of contextual information within nonharmonized workflow steps, unclear responsibilities, missing or incomplete data elements, and incomplete information about the computational environment information. Based on the identified shortcomings, we suggest a data management maturity framework to reach more clarity and to help define enhanced data management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The data management maturity framework supports the production and dissemination of accurate and provenance-enriched data for secondary use. Our work serves as a catalyst for the derivation of an overarching data management strategy, abiding data integrity and provenance characteristics as key factors. We envision that this work will lead to the generation of fairer and maintained health research data of high quality. JMIR Publications 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10666010/ /pubmed/37938878 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48809 Text en ©Kerstin Gierend, Sherry Freiesleben, Dennis Kadioglu, Fabian Siegel, Thomas Ganslandt, Dagmar Waltemath. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 08.11.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Gierend, Kerstin Freiesleben, Sherry Kadioglu, Dennis Siegel, Fabian Ganslandt, Thomas Waltemath, Dagmar The Status of Data Management Practices Across German Medical Data Integration Centers: Mixed Methods Study |
title | The Status of Data Management Practices Across German Medical Data Integration Centers: Mixed Methods Study |
title_full | The Status of Data Management Practices Across German Medical Data Integration Centers: Mixed Methods Study |
title_fullStr | The Status of Data Management Practices Across German Medical Data Integration Centers: Mixed Methods Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Status of Data Management Practices Across German Medical Data Integration Centers: Mixed Methods Study |
title_short | The Status of Data Management Practices Across German Medical Data Integration Centers: Mixed Methods Study |
title_sort | status of data management practices across german medical data integration centers: mixed methods study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938878 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/48809 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gierendkerstin thestatusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT freieslebensherry thestatusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT kadiogludennis thestatusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT siegelfabian thestatusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT ganslandtthomas thestatusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT waltemathdagmar thestatusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT gierendkerstin statusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT freieslebensherry statusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT kadiogludennis statusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT siegelfabian statusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT ganslandtthomas statusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy AT waltemathdagmar statusofdatamanagementpracticesacrossgermanmedicaldataintegrationcentersmixedmethodsstudy |