Cargando…

Usability and Overall Perception of a Health Bot for Nutrition-Related Questions for Patients Receiving Bariatric Care: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND: Currently, over 4000 bariatric procedures are performed annually in Switzerland. To improve outcomes, patients need to have good knowledge regarding postoperative nutrition. To potentially provide them with knowledge between dietetic consultations, a health bot (HB) was created. The HB c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beyeler, Marina, Légeret, Corinne, Kiwitz, Fabian, van der Horst, Klazine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938894
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/47913
_version_ 1785138953604562944
author Beyeler, Marina
Légeret, Corinne
Kiwitz, Fabian
van der Horst, Klazine
author_facet Beyeler, Marina
Légeret, Corinne
Kiwitz, Fabian
van der Horst, Klazine
author_sort Beyeler, Marina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, over 4000 bariatric procedures are performed annually in Switzerland. To improve outcomes, patients need to have good knowledge regarding postoperative nutrition. To potentially provide them with knowledge between dietetic consultations, a health bot (HB) was created. The HB can answer bariatric nutrition questions in writing based on artificial intelligence. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the usability and perception of the HB among patients receiving bariatric care. METHODS: Patients before or after bariatric surgery tested the HB. A mixed methods approach was used, which consisted of a questionnaire and qualitative interviews before and after testing the HB. The dimensions usability of, usefulness of, satisfaction with, and ease of use of the HB, among others, were measured. Data were analyzed using R Studio (R Studio Inc) and Excel (Microsoft Corp). The interviews were transcribed and a summary inductive content analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (female: n=8, 67%; male: n=4, 33%) were included. The results showed excellent usability with a mean usability score of 87 (SD 12.5; range 57.5-100) out of 100. Other dimensions of acceptability included usefulness (mean 5.28, SD 2.02 out of 7), satisfaction (mean 5.75, SD 1.68 out of 7), and learnability (mean 6.26, SD 1.5 out of 7). The concept of the HB and availability of reliable nutrition information were perceived as desirable (mean 5.5, SD 1.64 out of 7). Weaknesses were identified in the response accuracy, limited knowledge, and design of the HB. CONCLUSIONS: The HB’s ease of use and usability were evaluated to be positive; response accuracy, topic selection, and design should be optimized in a next step. The perceptions of nutrition professionals and the impact on patient care and the nutrition knowledge of participants need to be examined in further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10666014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106660142023-11-08 Usability and Overall Perception of a Health Bot for Nutrition-Related Questions for Patients Receiving Bariatric Care: Mixed Methods Study Beyeler, Marina Légeret, Corinne Kiwitz, Fabian van der Horst, Klazine JMIR Hum Factors Original Paper BACKGROUND: Currently, over 4000 bariatric procedures are performed annually in Switzerland. To improve outcomes, patients need to have good knowledge regarding postoperative nutrition. To potentially provide them with knowledge between dietetic consultations, a health bot (HB) was created. The HB can answer bariatric nutrition questions in writing based on artificial intelligence. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the usability and perception of the HB among patients receiving bariatric care. METHODS: Patients before or after bariatric surgery tested the HB. A mixed methods approach was used, which consisted of a questionnaire and qualitative interviews before and after testing the HB. The dimensions usability of, usefulness of, satisfaction with, and ease of use of the HB, among others, were measured. Data were analyzed using R Studio (R Studio Inc) and Excel (Microsoft Corp). The interviews were transcribed and a summary inductive content analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (female: n=8, 67%; male: n=4, 33%) were included. The results showed excellent usability with a mean usability score of 87 (SD 12.5; range 57.5-100) out of 100. Other dimensions of acceptability included usefulness (mean 5.28, SD 2.02 out of 7), satisfaction (mean 5.75, SD 1.68 out of 7), and learnability (mean 6.26, SD 1.5 out of 7). The concept of the HB and availability of reliable nutrition information were perceived as desirable (mean 5.5, SD 1.64 out of 7). Weaknesses were identified in the response accuracy, limited knowledge, and design of the HB. CONCLUSIONS: The HB’s ease of use and usability were evaluated to be positive; response accuracy, topic selection, and design should be optimized in a next step. The perceptions of nutrition professionals and the impact on patient care and the nutrition knowledge of participants need to be examined in further studies. JMIR Publications 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10666014/ /pubmed/37938894 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/47913 Text en ©Marina Beyeler, Corinne Légeret, Fabian Kiwitz, Klazine van der Horst. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 08.11.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Beyeler, Marina
Légeret, Corinne
Kiwitz, Fabian
van der Horst, Klazine
Usability and Overall Perception of a Health Bot for Nutrition-Related Questions for Patients Receiving Bariatric Care: Mixed Methods Study
title Usability and Overall Perception of a Health Bot for Nutrition-Related Questions for Patients Receiving Bariatric Care: Mixed Methods Study
title_full Usability and Overall Perception of a Health Bot for Nutrition-Related Questions for Patients Receiving Bariatric Care: Mixed Methods Study
title_fullStr Usability and Overall Perception of a Health Bot for Nutrition-Related Questions for Patients Receiving Bariatric Care: Mixed Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed Usability and Overall Perception of a Health Bot for Nutrition-Related Questions for Patients Receiving Bariatric Care: Mixed Methods Study
title_short Usability and Overall Perception of a Health Bot for Nutrition-Related Questions for Patients Receiving Bariatric Care: Mixed Methods Study
title_sort usability and overall perception of a health bot for nutrition-related questions for patients receiving bariatric care: mixed methods study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938894
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/47913
work_keys_str_mv AT beyelermarina usabilityandoverallperceptionofahealthbotfornutritionrelatedquestionsforpatientsreceivingbariatriccaremixedmethodsstudy
AT legeretcorinne usabilityandoverallperceptionofahealthbotfornutritionrelatedquestionsforpatientsreceivingbariatriccaremixedmethodsstudy
AT kiwitzfabian usabilityandoverallperceptionofahealthbotfornutritionrelatedquestionsforpatientsreceivingbariatriccaremixedmethodsstudy
AT vanderhorstklazine usabilityandoverallperceptionofahealthbotfornutritionrelatedquestionsforpatientsreceivingbariatriccaremixedmethodsstudy